IMR-LLM: Industrial Multi-Robot Task Planning and Program Generation using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02669v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 06:55:27 GMT
• Title: IMR-LLM: Industrial Multi-Robot Task Planning and Program Generation using Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in coordinating robots for simple household and manipulation tasks.<n>We propose IMR-LLM, a novel LLM-driven Industrial Multi-Robot task planning and program generation framework.
• Score: 20.3492719490871
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In modern industrial production, multiple robots often collaborate to complete complex manufacturing tasks. Large language models (LLMs), with their strong reasoning capabilities, have shown potential in coordinating robots for simple household and manipulation tasks. However, in industrial scenarios, stricter sequential constraints and more complex dependencies within tasks present new challenges for LLMs. To address this, we propose IMR-LLM, a novel LLM-driven Industrial Multi-Robot task planning and program generation framework. Specifically, we utilize LLMs to assist in constructing disjunctive graphs and employ deterministic solving methods to obtain a feasible and efficient high-level task plan. Based on this, we use a process tree to guide LLMs to generate executable low-level programs. Additionally, we create IMR-Bench, a challenging benchmark that encompasses multi-robot industrial tasks across three levels of complexity. Experimental results indicate that our method significantly surpasses existing methods across all evaluation metrics.

Related papers

• Hybrid LLM-based Intelligent Framework for Robot Task Scheduling [6.227803171257308]
  This study introduces intelligent frameworks that use Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve task scheduling for construction robots.<n>A well-balanced allocation strategy is developed, optimizing both time efficiency and resource utilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T00:04:38Z)
• EIFBENCH: Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models [64.70546873396624]
  We present the Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark (EIFBENCH) for evaluating large language models (LLMs)<n>EIFBENCH includes multi-task scenarios that enable comprehensive assessment across diverse task types concurrently.<n>We also propose the Segment Policy Optimization (SegPO) algorithm to enhance the LLM's ability to accurately fulfill multi-task workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T02:39:55Z)
• LLM+MAP: Bimanual Robot Task Planning using Large Language Models and Planning Domain Definition Language [17.914580097058106]
  Bimanual robotic manipulation presents an inherent challenge due to the complexity involved in the spatial and temporal coordination between two hands.<n>Existing works predominantly focus on attaining human-level manipulation skills for robotic hands, yet little attention has been paid to task planning on long-horizon timescales.<n>This paper introduces LLM+MAP, a bimanual planning framework that integrates LLM reasoning and multi-agent planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:04:01Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• MALMM: Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Robotics Manipulation [62.854649499866774]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable planning abilities across various domains, including robotics manipulation and navigation.<n>We propose a novel multi-agent LLM framework that distributes high-level planning and low-level control code generation across specialized LLM agents.<n>We evaluate our approach on nine RLBench tasks, including long-horizon tasks, and demonstrate its ability to solve robotics manipulation in a zero-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T17:53:44Z)
• Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance. We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z)
• COHERENT: Collaboration of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot System with Large Language Models [49.24666980374751]
  COHERENT is a novel LLM-based task planning framework for collaboration of heterogeneous multi-robot systems.<n>A Proposal-Execution-Feedback-Adjustment mechanism is designed to decompose and assign actions for individual robots.<n>The experimental results show that our work surpasses the previous methods by a large margin in terms of success rate and execution efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T15:53:41Z)
• Robo-Instruct: Simulator-Augmented Instruction Alignment For Finetuning Code LLMs [34.16234805577773]
  We introduce ROBO-INSTRUCT, which synthesizes task-specific simulation environments on the fly during program execution.<n>ROBO-INSTRUCT integrates an LLM-aided post-processing procedure to refine instructions for better alignment with robot programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T15:47:54Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.