A Natural Language Agentic Approach to Study Affective Polarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02711v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:02:58 GMT
• Title: A Natural Language Agentic Approach to Study Affective Polarization
• Authors: Stephanie Anneris Malvicini, Ewelina Gajewska, Arda Derbent, Katarzyna Budzynska, Jarosław A. Chudziak, Maria Vanina Martinez,
• Abstract summary: Affective polarization has been central to political and social studies, with growing focus on social media.<n>We present a multi-agent model providing a comprehensive approach to studying affective polarization in social media.<n>We develop a platform leveraging large language models (LLMs) to construct virtual communities where agents engage in discussions.
• Score: 2.6363860776602333
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Affective polarization has been central to political and social studies, with growing focus on social media, where partisan divisions are often exacerbated. Real-world studies tend to have limited scope, while simulated studies suffer from insufficient high-quality training data, as manually labeling posts is labor-intensive and prone to subjective biases. The lack of adequate tools to formalize different definitions of affective polarization across studies complicates result comparison and hinders interoperable frameworks. We present a multi-agent model providing a comprehensive approach to studying affective polarization in social media. To operationalize our framework, we develop a platform leveraging large language models (LLMs) to construct virtual communities where agents engage in discussions. We showcase the potential of our platform by (1) analyzing questions related to affective polarization, as explored in social science literature, providing a fresh perspective on this phenomenon, and (2) introducing scenarios that allow observation and measurement of polarization at different levels of granularity and abstraction. Experiments show that our platform is a flexible tool for computational studies of complex social dynamics such as affective polarization. It leverages advanced agent models to simulate rich, context-sensitive interactions and systematically explore research questions traditionally addressed through human-subject studies.

Related papers

• Measuring Social Media Polarization Using Large Language Models and Heuristic Rules [0.0]
  This study systematically analyze and quantify affective polarization in discussions on divisive topics such as climate change and gun control.<n>By combining AI-driven content annotation with domain-informed scoring, our framework offers a scalable and interpretable approach to measuring affective polarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T01:11:58Z)
• Quantifying Polarization: A Comparative Study of Measures and Methods [2.0249250133493195]
  Political polarization, a key driver of social fragmentation, has drawn increasing attention for its role in shaping online and offline discourse.<n>This study evaluates five widely used polarization measures, testing their strengths and weaknesses with synthetic datasets.<n>We present a novel adaptation of Kleinberg's burst detection algorithm to improve mode detection in polarized distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T16:43:23Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [79.96817421756668]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate polarization and its consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• In-Group Love, Out-Group Hate: A Framework to Measure Affective Polarization via Contentious Online Discussions [2.8963943201523796]
  We introduce a discrete choice model that captures decision-making within affectively polarized social networks.<n>We propose a statistical inference method estimate key parameters -- in-group love and out-group hate -- from social media data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T23:58:13Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Ethos and Pathos in Online Group Discussions: Corpora for Polarisation Issues in Social Media [6.530320465510631]
  Growing polarisation in society caught the attention of the scientific community as well as news media. We propose to approach the problem by investigating rhetorical strategies employed by individuals in polarising discussions online. We develop multi-topic and multi-platform corpora with manual annotation of appeals to ethos and pathos, two modes of persuasion in Aristotelian rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T09:10:47Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• The drivers of online polarization: fitting models to data [0.0]
  echo chamber effect and opinion polarization may be driven by several factors including human biases in information consumption and personalized recommendations produced by feed algorithms. Until now, studies have mainly used opinion dynamic models to explore the mechanisms behind the emergence of polarization and echo chambers. We provide a method to numerically compare the opinion distributions obtained from simulations with those measured on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T17:00:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.