The Geometry of Learning Under AI Delegation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02950v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 13:01:22 GMT
• Title: The Geometry of Learning Under AI Delegation
• Abstract summary: As AI systems shift from tools to collaborators, a central question is how the skills of humans relying on them change over time.<n>We study this question mathematically by modeling the joint evolution of human skill and AI delegation as a coupled dynamical system.<n>Our results identify stability, not incentives or misalignment, as the central mechanism by which AI assistance can undermine long-run human performance and skill.
• Score: 24.790811527847527
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI systems shift from tools to collaborators, a central question is how the skills of humans relying on them change over time. We study this question mathematically by modeling the joint evolution of human skill and AI delegation as a coupled dynamical system. In our model, delegation adapts to relative performance, while skill improves through use and decays under non-use; crucially, both updates arise from optimizing a single performance metric measuring expected task error. Despite this local alignment, adaptive AI use fundamentally alters the global stability structure of human skill acquisition. Beyond the high-skill equilibrium of human-only learning, the system admits a *stable* low-skill equilibrium corresponding to persistent reliance, separated by a sharp basin boundary that makes early decisions effectively irreversible under the induced dynamics. We further show that AI assistance can strictly improve short-run performance while inducing persistent long-run performance loss relative to the no-AI baseline, driven by a negative feedback between delegation and practice. We characterize how AI quality deforms the basin boundary and show that these effects are robust to noise and asymmetric trust updates. Our results identify stability, not incentives or misalignment, as the central mechanism by which AI assistance can undermine long-run human performance and skill.

Related papers

• Human-AI Productivity Paradoxes: Modeling the Interplay of Skill, Effort, and AI Assistance [1.9326159189892944]
  We propose a model of human-AI interaction to better understand and analyze several mechanisms by which AI affects productivity.<n>In our setup, human agents with varying skill levels exert utility-maximizing effort to produce certain task outcomes with AI assistance.<n>We find that incorporating either endogeneity in skill development or in AI unreliability can induce a productivity paradox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T00:12:27Z)
• Cognitive Amplification vs Cognitive Delegation in Human-AI Systems: A Metric Framework [0.0]
  This paper introduces a conceptual and mathematical framework for distinguishing cognitive amplification.<n>It shows that AI improves hybrid human-AI performance while preserving human expertise.<n>We argue that human-AI systems should be designed under a cognitive sustainability constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T09:39:24Z)
• Align When They Want, Complement When They Need! Human-Centered Ensembles for Adaptive Human-AI Collaboration [13.041288521972563]
  In human-AI decision making, designing AI that complements human expertise has been a natural strategy to enhance human-AI collaboration.<n>An aligned AI fosters trust yet risks reinforcing suboptimal human behavior and lowering human-AI team performance.<n>We introduce a novel human-centered adaptive AI ensemble that strategically toggles between two specialist AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T18:22:58Z)
• EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
  Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
• StablePDENet: Enhancing Stability of Operator Learning for Solving Differential Equations [15.953048749834716]
  We formulate operator learning as a min-max optimization problem, where the model is trained against worst-case input perturbations to achieve consistent performance under both normal and adversarial conditions.<n>Results highlight the importance of stability-aware training in operator learning and provide a foundation for developing reliable neural PDE solvers in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T07:38:21Z)
• Generative AI for Social Impact [37.37093679341245]
  AI for Social Impact (AI4SI) has achieved compelling results in public health, conservation, and security.<n>We characterize this bottleneck through three gaps: observational scarcity resulting from limited or unreliable data; policy challenges involving decisions and nonstationarity; and the friction of human-AI alignment.<n>We argue that Generative AI offers a unified pathway to bridge these gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T02:44:39Z)
• AI Autonomy Coefficient ($α$): Defining Boundaries for Responsible AI Systems [0.15293427903448018]
  Integrity of contemporary AI systems is compromised by misuse of Human-in-the-Loop models.<n>We introduce the AI-First, Human-Empowered (AFHE) paradigm, which requires AI systems to demonstrate a quantifiable level of functional independence.<n>We conclude that AFHE provides a metric-driven approach for ensuring verifiable autonomy, transparency, and sustainable operational integrity in modern AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T05:41:20Z)
• Guided Self-Evolving LLMs with Minimal Human Supervision [53.111086364268566]
  Unguided self-evolving systems often plateau quickly or degrade as training.<n>R-Few is a guided Self-Play Challenger acquirer framework that incorporates lightweight human oversight through in-context grounding and mixed training.<n>R-Few achieves consistent and iterative improvements across math and general reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T07:06:11Z)
• Human-in-the-loop Online Rejection Sampling for Robotic Manipulation [55.99788088622936]
  Hi-ORS stabilizes value estimation by filtering out negatively rewarded samples during online fine-tuning.<n>Hi-ORS fine-tunes a pi-base policy to master contact-rich manipulation in just 1.5 hours of real-world training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T11:53:08Z)
• The Missing Reward: Active Inference in the Era of Experience [1.9761774213809036]
  Active Inference (AIF) provides a crucial foundation for developing autonomous AI agents.<n>AIF can replace external reward signals with an intrinsic drive to minimize free energy.<n>This synthesis offers a compelling path toward AI systems that can develop autonomously while adhering to both computational and physical constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:57:12Z)
• To Err Is AI! Debugging as an Intervention to Facilitate Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems [11.690126756498223]
  Vision for optimal human-AI collaboration requires 'appropriate reliance' of humans on AI systems. In practice, the performance disparity of machine learning models on out-of-distribution data makes dataset-specific performance feedback unreliable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T09:43:27Z)
• DeltaPhi: Physical States Residual Learning for Neural Operators in Data-Limited PDE Solving [54.605760146540234]
  DeltaPhi is a novel learning framework that transforms the PDE solving task from learning direct input-output mappings to learning the residuals between similar physical states.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate consistent and significant improvements across diverse physical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T07:45:07Z)
• AttNS: Attention-Inspired Numerical Solving For Limited Data Scenarios [51.94807626839365]
  We propose the attention-inspired numerical solver (AttNS) to solve differential equations due to limited data.<n>AttNS is inspired by the effectiveness of attention modules in Residual Neural Networks (ResNet) in enhancing model generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T01:39:21Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.