Draft-Conditioned Constrained Decoding for Structured Generation in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03305v1
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2026 03:52:24 GMT
- Title: Draft-Conditioned Constrained Decoding for Structured Generation in LLMs
- Abstract summary: Constrained decoding can distort generation when the model assigns low probability mass to valid continuations.<n>We propose emphDraft-Conditioned Constrained Decoding (DCCD), a training-free inference procedure that decouples semantic planning from structural enforcement.<n>We analyze DCCD through a KL-projection view, showing that draft conditioning increases feasible mass and reduces the cumulative "projection tax" induced by hard constraints.
- Score: 11.309525632171217
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate executable outputs, JSON objects, and API calls, where a single syntax error can make the output unusable. Constrained decoding enforces validity token-by-token via masking and renormalization, but it can distort generation when the model assigns low probability mass to valid continuations, pushing decoding toward locally valid yet semantically incorrect trajectories. We propose \emph{Draft-Conditioned Constrained Decoding (DCCD)}, a simple two-step, training-free inference procedure that decouples semantic planning from structural enforcement: an unconstrained draft is generated first, and constrained decoding is then applied, conditioned on this draft, to guarantee validity. We analyze DCCD through a KL-projection view, showing that draft conditioning increases feasible mass and reduces the cumulative "projection tax" induced by hard constraints, with an optional best-of-$K$ draft selection. Across structured reasoning benchmarks, DCCD improves strict structured accuracy by up to +24 percentage points over standard constrained decoding (e.g., 15.2\% to 39.0\% on GSM8K with a 1B model), and enables smaller model pairs to match or exceed much larger constrained baselines, yielding substantial gains in parameter efficiency.
Related papers
- DIVERSED: Relaxed Speculative Decoding via Dynamic Ensemble Verification [29.426184837710952]
Speculative decoding is an effective technique for accelerating large language model inference by drafting multiple tokens in parallel.<n>We propose Dynamic Verification Relaxed Speculative Decoding (DIVERSED), a relaxed verification framework that improves time efficiency while preserving generation quality.<n>We demonstrate that DIVERSED achieves substantially higher inference efficiency compared to standard speculative decoding methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T21:52:32Z) - Continuous Autoregressive Language Models [56.49239051750678]
We introduce Continuous Autoregressive Language Models (CALM)<n>CALM uses a high-fidelity autoencoder to compress a chunk of K tokens into a single continuous vector.<n>We develop a comprehensive likelihood-free framework that enables robust training, evaluation, and controllable sampling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T17:58:11Z) - Fast Inference via Hierarchical Speculative Decoding [65.40448210801763]
We introduce Hierarchical Speculative Decoding (HSD), an algorithm that stacks draft models into a hierarchy, where each model proposes tokens, and the next larger model verifies them in a single forward pass.<n>HSD gives up to 1.2x speed-up over the best single-draft baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T15:56:19Z) - Free Draft-and-Verification: Toward Lossless Parallel Decoding for Diffusion Large Language Models [8.407364705777587]
We introduce Free Draft-and-Verification (FreeDave), a novel fast decoding algorithm tailored forDLLMs.<n>FreeDave is proven to boost the inference throughput up to $3.78times$ without performance degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T21:28:04Z) - DiffuSpec: Unlocking Diffusion Language Models for Speculative Decoding [66.40658898418316]
We present DiffuSpec, a training-free drop-in framework that uses a pretrained diffusion language model (DLM) to produce multi-token drafts in a single forward pass.<n>Across benchmarks, DiffuSpec yields up to 3x wall-clock speedup, establishing diffusion-based drafting as a robust alternative to autoregressive drafters for speculative decoding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T07:00:15Z) - Accelerating Diffusion LLMs via Adaptive Parallel Decoding [60.407727995313074]
We introduce adaptive parallel decoding (APD), a novel method that dynamically adjusts the number of tokens sampled in parallel.<n>APD provides markedly higher throughput with minimal quality degradations on downstream benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T06:10:10Z) - Fast Controlled Generation from Language Models with Adaptive Weighted Rejection Sampling [90.86991492288487]
evaluating constraint on every token can be prohibitively expensive.<n> LCD can distort the global distribution over strings, sampling tokens based only on local information.<n>We show that our approach is superior to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T18:30:18Z) - Graph-Structured Speculative Decoding [52.94367724136063]
Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising technique to accelerate the inference of Large Language Models.
We introduce an innovative approach utilizing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to manage the drafted hypotheses.
We observe a remarkable speedup of 1.73$times$ to 1.96$times$, significantly surpassing standard speculative decoding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T06:21:24Z) - Adaptive Draft-Verification for Efficient Large Language Model Decoding [24.347886232342862]
Large language model (LLM) decoding involves generating a sequence of tokens based on a given context.
The typical autoregressive decoding method requires a separate forward pass through the model for each token generated.
We introduce ADED, which accelerates LLM decoding without requiring fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T22:20:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.