From We to Me: Theory Informed Narrative Shift with Abductive Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03320v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 04:10:19 GMT
• Title: From We to Me: Theory Informed Narrative Shift with Abductive Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We propose a neurosymbolic approach grounded in social science theory and abductive reasoning.<n>Our method automatically extracts rules to abduce the specific story elements needed to guide an Large Language Model.<n>We show similar performance across both directions for Llama-4, and Grok-4 and competitive performance for Deep-seek-R1.
• Score: 1.0930816518774933
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Effective communication often relies on aligning a message with an audience's narrative and worldview. Narrative shift involves transforming text to reflect a different narrative framework while preserving its original core message--a task we demonstrate is significantly challenging for current Large Language Models (LLMs). To address this, we propose a neurosymbolic approach grounded in social science theory and abductive reasoning. Our method automatically extracts rules to abduce the specific story elements needed to guide an LLM through a consistent and targeted narrative transformation. Across multiple LLMs, abduction-guided transformed stories shifted the narrative while maintaining the fidelity with the original story. For example, with GPT-4o we outperform the zero-shot LLM baseline by 55.88% for collectivistic to individualistic narrative shift while maintaining superior semantic similarity with the original stories (40.4% improvement in KL divergence). For individualistic to collectivistic transformation, we achieve comparable improvements. We show similar performance across both directions for Llama-4, and Grok-4 and competitive performance for Deepseek-R1.

Related papers

• The Story Shapes the Agent: Narrative Priors in LLM Behavior [12.905014436867317]
  Persona prompting is widely used to steer LLM agent behavior, yet the narrative framing of a task can matter more than the assigned persona.<n>We construct three text-based investigation games that share the same action space, stage progression, and resource constraints while varying only task narrative.<n>We identify narrative priors: systematic action tendencies activated by a task's story framing, independent of its decision structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T23:03:16Z)
• Do Large Language Models Always Tell The Same Stories? [2.4779770815686444]
  We investigate the diversity of large language models-generated stories through the framework of narrative similarity.<n>Our findings reveal a consistent trend: LLM-generated narratives are consistently more similar to each other than human-written stories are.<n>We show that common mitigation strategies, including negative prompting and temperature scaling, fail to meaningfully address this homogeneity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T22:52:02Z)
• Codified Foreshadowing-Payoff Text Generation [67.01182739162142]
  Foreshadowing and payoff are ubiquitous narrative devices through which authors introduce commitments early in a story and resolve them through concrete, observable outcomes.<n>Existing evaluations largely overlook this structural failure, focusing on surface-level coherence rather than the logical fulfillment of narrative setups.<n>We introduce Codified Foreshadowing-Payoff Generation, a novel framework that reframes narrative quality through the lens of payoff realization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T19:05:37Z)
• Living the Novel: A System for Generating Self-Training Timeline-Aware Conversational Agents from Novels [50.43968216132018]
  We present an end-to-end system that transforms any literary work into an immersive, multi-character conversational experience.<n>This system is designed to solve two fundamental challenges for LLM-driven characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T11:57:46Z)
• Mapping News Narratives Using LLMs and Narrative-Structured Text Embeddings [0.0]
  We introduce a numerical narrative representation grounded in structuralist linguistic theory. We extract the actants using an open-source LLM and integrate them into a Narrative-Structured Text Embedding. We demonstrate the analytical insights of the method on the example of 5000 full-text news articles from Al Jazeera and The Washington Post on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T14:15:30Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? [114.34140090869175]
  This paper investigates the capability of LLMs in storytelling, focusing on narrative development and plot progression. We introduce a novel computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. We show that explicit integration of discourse features can enhance storytelling, as is demonstrated by over 40% improvement in neural storytelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:02:49Z)
• GPT-4 Generated Narratives of Life Events using a Structured Narrative Prompt: A Validation Study [0.0]
  We employ a zero-shot structured narrative prompt to generate 24,000 narratives using OpenAI's GPT-4. From this dataset, we manually classify 2,880 narratives and evaluate their validity in conveying birth, death, hiring, and firing events. We extend our analysis to predict the classifications of the remaining 21,120 narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T06:20:01Z)
• Let Models Speak Ciphers: Multiagent Debate through Embeddings [84.20336971784495]
  We introduce CIPHER (Communicative Inter-Model Protocol Through Embedding Representation) to address this issue. By deviating from natural language, CIPHER offers an advantage of encoding a broader spectrum of information without any modification to the model weights. This showcases the superiority and robustness of embeddings as an alternative "language" for communication among LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T03:06:38Z)
• How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind? [69.41586417697732]
  We propose a new evaluation paradigm for large language models (LLMs): Thinking for Doing (T4D) T4D requires models to connect inferences about others' mental states to actions in social scenarios. We introduce a zero-shot prompting framework, Foresee and Reflect (FaR), which provides a reasoning structure that encourages LLMs to anticipate future challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T06:47:58Z)
• Paragraph-level Commonsense Transformers with Recurrent Memory [77.4133779538797]
  We train a discourse-aware model that incorporates paragraph-level information to generate coherent commonsense inferences from narratives. Our results show that PARA-COMET outperforms the sentence-level baselines, particularly in generating inferences that are both coherent and novel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T05:24:12Z)
• Narrative Interpolation for Generating and Understanding Stories [52.463747140762145]
  We propose a method for controlled narrative/story generation where we are able to guide the model to produce coherent narratives with user-specified target endings. The core of our method is an incrementally model based on GPT-2 which conditions on a previous sentence and a next sentence in a narrative and fills in the gap. We show that ending-guided generation results in narratives which are coherent, faithful to the given ending guide, and require less manual effort on the part of the human guide writer than past approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T16:45:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.