(Quantum) reference frames, relational observables, gauge reduction and physical interpretation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04072v1
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:47:37 GMT
- Title: (Quantum) reference frames, relational observables, gauge reduction and physical interpretation
- Authors: Thomas Thiemann,
- Abstract summary: It is mandatory to know how to operationally define and translate a reference frame into mathematics.<n>New conceptual and technical questions arise such as: Should one reduce before or after quantisation and how are the reference fields quantised respectively in either route?<n>A central role is played by the concept of the relational reference frame transformation (RRFT) for which a general formula is derived and its properties are explored.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: It is mandatory to know how to operationally define and translate a reference frame into mathematics, in order that a physical interpretation of theory calculations in terms of observational data is possible. The situation is particularly challenging for gauge systems such as General Relativity where spacetime coordinates are subject to spacetime diffeomorphisms considered as gauge transformations turning coordinates into non-observables. This motivates the idea of operationally defined (material) reference frames which specify coordinates in terms of matter or geometry reference fields leading to the concept of relational observables, relational reference frames and gauge reduction. Upon quantisation, all fields become operator valued distributions. Now new conceptual and technical questions arise such as: Should one reduce before or after quantisation and how are the reference fields quantised respectively in either route? Is a reference frame itself subject to quantisation and how are different quantum reference frames related? How does the gauge reduction fit into this, i.e. how can it be that a certain reference field is considered a non-observable in one reference frame and an observable in another which upon quantisation even displays fluctuations? How precisely are gauge dependent fields interpreted in terms of the relational observables in a given reference frame? What is the relative dynamics, e.g. how exactly are physical Hamiltonians of two relational reference frames related? The present conceptual work addresses these and related questions in a non-perturbative field theory context of sufficient generality to cover General Relativity coupled to standard matter. A central role is played by the concept of the relational reference frame transformation (RRFT) for which a general formula is derived and its properties are explored.
Related papers
- How do we Observe Relational Observables? [0.0]
How do relational observables actually make contact with experience?
I argue that this question can only be answered by providing a schematization of the observer.
I consider what this means for the prospects of using quantum reference frames to address the problem of time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T21:27:19Z) - Quantum Reference Frames from Top-Down Crossed Products [0.0]
Crossed product is a way to realize quantum reference frames from the bottom-up.
We show that one cannot obtain in quantumequivalent reference frames using this approach.
We term this algebra the G-framed algebra, and show how potentially inequivalent frames are realized within this object.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T18:00:01Z) - Matter relative to quantum hypersurfaces [44.99833362998488]
We extend the Page-Wootters formalism to quantum field theory.
By treating hypersurfaces as quantum reference frames, we extend quantum frame transformations to changes between classical and nonclassical hypersurfaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T16:39:00Z) - Measurement events relative to temporal quantum reference frames [44.99833362998488]
We compare two consistent approaches to the Page-Wootters formalism to clarify the operational meaning of evolution and measurements.<n>We show that for non-ideal clocks, the purified measurement approach yields a time non-local evolution equation.<n>We argue that these approaches describe operationally distinct situations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T18:26:12Z) - Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transformations [0.0]
We provide a general, operationally motivated framework for quantum reference frames and their transformations.<n>The work is built around the notion of operational equivalence, in which quantum states that cannot be physically distinguished are identified.<n>We give an explicit realisation in the setting that the initial frame admits a highly localized state with respect to the frame observable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T13:58:21Z) - Quantum reference frames: derivation of perspective-dependent
descriptions via a perspective-neutral structure [0.0]
We develop a symmetry-inspired approach to describe physics from the perspective of quantum reference frames.
We show that the operationally meaningful perspective dependent descriptions are given by Darboux coordinates on the constraint surface.
We conclude by constructing a quantum perspective neutral structure, via which we can derive and change perspective dependent descriptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-04T18:09:07Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Quantum Relativity of Subsystems [58.720142291102135]
We show that different reference frame perspectives induce different sets of subsystem observable algebras, which leads to a gauge-invariant, frame-dependent notion of subsystems and entanglement.
Such a QRF perspective does not inherit the distinction between subsystems in terms of the corresponding tensor factorizability of the kinematical Hilbert space and observable algebra.
Since the condition for this to occur is contingent on the choice of QRF, the notion of subsystem locality is frame-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T19:00:01Z) - Quantum particle across Grushin singularity [77.34726150561087]
We study the phenomenon of transmission across the singularity that separates the two half-cylinders.
All the local realisations of the free (Laplace-Beltrami) quantum Hamiltonian are examined as non-equivalent protocols of transmission/reflection.
This allows to comprehend the distinguished status of the so-called bridging' transmission protocol previously identified in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-27T12:53:23Z) - Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic
settings [68.8204255655161]
We show that the trinity' of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector.
We ascribe the time according to the clock subsystem to a POVM which is covariant with respect to its (quadratic) Hamiltonian.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T16:12:24Z) - Switching quantum reference frames in the N-body problem and the absence
of global relational perspectives [0.0]
We develop a systematic method for switching between descriptions of physics relative to quantum reference frames (QRFs)
Thanks to gauge related redundancies, this leads to a perspective-neutral structure which contains all frame choices at once and via which frame perspectives can be consistently switched.
We illustrate this in a general mechanical model, namely the relational $N$-body problem in 3D space with rotational and translational symmetry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2018-09-13T17:58:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.