OMNIINTENT: A Trusted Intent-Centric Framework for User-Friendly Web3

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04168v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:24:47 GMT
• Title: OMNIINTENT: A Trusted Intent-Centric Framework for User-Friendly Web3
• Abstract summary: Intent-Centric finance allows users to focus on their trading intents rather than the underlying execution details.<n>We present OMNIINTENT, a language-runtime co-design that reconciles these requirements.<n>Our full-stack prototype processes diverse DeFi scenarios, achieving 89.6% throughput coverage, up to 7.3x speedup via parallel execution, and feasibility-prediction accuracy up to 99.2% with low latency.
• Score: 6.606052122056915
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The increasingly complex Web3 ecosystem and decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape demand ever higher levels of technical expertise and financial literacy from participants. The Intent-Centric paradigm in DeFi has thus emerged in response, which allows users to focus on their trading intents rather than the underlying execution details. However, existing approaches, including Typed-intent design and LLM-driven solver, trade off expressiveness, trust, privacy, and composability. We present OMNIINTENT, a language-runtime co-design that reconciles these requirements. OMNIINTENT introduces ICL, a domain-specific Intent-Centric Language for precise yet flexible specification of triggers, actions, and runtime constraints; a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-based compiler that compiles intents into signed, state-bound transactions inside an enclave; and an execution optimizer that constructs transaction dependency graphs for safe parallel batch submission and a mempool-aware feasibility checker that predicts execution outcomes. Our full-stack prototype processes diverse DeFi scenarios, achieving 89.6% intent coverage, up to 7.3x throughput speedup via parallel execution, and feasibility-prediction accuracy up to 99.2% with low latency.

Related papers

• Learning Where Outcomes Change:Credit-Addressable Reasoning for Multimodal Geometry [105.89493240787861]
  We introduce credit-addressable reasoning, in which semantic units exposed during inference also define where learning compares alternatives and assigns credit.<n>We instantiate this principle with Code-CoT, which represents visual relations as line-addressable executable code, and organizes reasoning into typed events.<n>Across nine geometry benchmarks, CE-GRPO achieves an average accuracy of 76.04, outperforming Qwen3-VL-8B and trajectory-level GRPO by $8.09$ and 3.43 points, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T08:44:36Z)
• LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability [0.937536571362766]
  We introduce LLMFACETS (LLM FActuality Cross-EvaluaTion System): an open-source framework with a browser-accessible interface and a plugin architecture.<n>A plugin architecture allows any new metric dataset to be integrated without modifying the evaluation pipeline.<n>We verify the framework through cross-validation of 18 metric implementations against canonical reference libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T11:20:47Z)
• GTA: Generating Long-Horizon Tasks for Web Agents at Scale [82.43869456830664]
  We introduce a scalable framework, GTA, that integrates crawling, retrieval-based seeding, in-context generation, and automated quality control.<n>We instantiate the pipeline on over 50 websites covering e-commerce, government, forums, and news, with multilingual and multi-hop coverage.<n>Our contributions are three-fold: (i) formalizing multi-hop web-agent task generation, (ii) proposing an efficient and validated pipeline for automatic data creation, and (iii) releasing a dynamic benchmark with reproducible evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T01:05:50Z)
• Intent2Tx: Benchmarking LLMs for Translating Natural Language Intents into Ethereum Transactions [6.606052122056915]
  textscIntent2Tx grounds natural language intents in real-world protocol interactions across 11 categories.<n>textscIntent2Tx serves as a critical foundation for developing autonomous, reliable agents in intent-centric Web3 ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T11:52:50Z)
• Accuracy-Delay Trade-Off in LLM Offloading via Token-Level Uncertainty [9.403735095944747]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential for intelligent mobile services but are computationally intensive for resource-constrained devices.<n>Mobile edge computing (MEC) allows such devices to offload inference tasks to edge servers (ESs), yet introduces latency due to communication and serverside queuing.<n>We propose an uncertainty-aware offloading framework that dynamically decides whether to perform inference locally or offload it to the ES.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T13:03:03Z)
• From Assumptions to Actions: Turning LLM Reasoning into Uncertainty-Aware Planning for Embodied Agents [5.817643726988822]
  Embodied agents operating in multi-agent, partially observable, and decentralized environments must plan and act despite pervasive uncertainty.<n>We introduce PCE, a Planner-Composer-Evaluator framework that converts fragmented assumptions latent in Large Language Models reasoning traces into a structured decision tree.<n>We show that PCE consistently outperforms communication-centric baselines in success rate and task efficiency while showing comparable token usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T08:43:39Z)
• Autonomous Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Graph-Based Fraud Detection [73.9189065770752]
  Graph-based fraud detection on text-attributed graphs (TAGs) requires jointly modeling rich textual semantics and relational dependencies.<n>We propose FraudCoT, a unified framework that advances TAG-based fraud detection through autonomous, graph-aware chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and scalable LLM-GNN co-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T13:12:12Z)
• Should I Have Expressed a Different Intent? Counterfactual Generation for LLM-Based Autonomous Control [31.47957931665684]
  Large language model (LLM)-powered agents can translate high-level user intents into plans and actions in an environment.<n>We introduce a framework that enables such counterfactual reasoning in agentic control scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T22:18:57Z)
• Ad Insertion in LLM-Generated Responses [16.434649348378706]
  We propose a practical framework that resolves tensions through two decoupling strategies.<n>First, we decouple ad insertion from response generation to ensure safety and explicit disclosure.<n>Second, we decouple bidding from specific user queries by using genres'' (high-level semantic clusters) as a proxy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T10:16:03Z)
• LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering [90.84806758077536]
  We introduce textbfLoCoBench-Agent, a comprehensive evaluation framework specifically designed to assess large language models (LLMs) agents in realistic, long-context software engineering.<n>Our framework extends LoCoBench's 8,000 scenarios into interactive agent environments, enabling systematic evaluation of multi-turn conversations.<n>Our framework provides agents with 8 specialized tools (file operations, search, code analysis) and evaluates them across context lengths ranging from 10K to 1M tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T23:57:24Z)
• Federated Attention: A Distributed Paradigm for Collaborative LLM Inference over Edge Networks [63.541114376141735]
  Large language models (LLMs) are proliferating rapidly at the edge, delivering intelligent capabilities across diverse application scenarios.<n>However, their practical deployment in collaborative scenarios confronts fundamental challenges: privacy vulnerabilities, communication overhead, and computational bottlenecks.<n>We propose Federated Attention (FedAttn), which integrates the federated paradigm into the self-attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T15:14:58Z)
• Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfaces [59.80143393787701]
  Large language models (LLMs) can handle uncertainty and promise to accelerate replanning while lowering the barrier to entry.<n>We introduce a neurosymbolic framework that pairs the accessibility of natural-language dialogue with verifiable guarantees on goal interpretation.<n>A lightweight model, fine-tuned on just 100 uncertainty-filtered examples, surpasses the zero-shot performance of GPT-4.1 while cutting inference latency by nearly 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T14:24:01Z)
• Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs: Framework Comparison and Research Directions [59.5243730853157]
  Federated learning (FL) provides a privacy-preserving solution for fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using distributed private datasets.<n>This article conducts a comparative analysis of three advanced federated LLM (FedLLM) frameworks that integrate knowledge distillation (KD) and split learning (SL) to mitigate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T11:37:06Z)
• Adaptive Stream Processing on Edge Devices through Active Inference [5.5676731834895765]
  We present a novel Machine Learning paradigm based on Active Inference (AIF) AIF describes how the brain constantly predicts and evaluates sensory information to decrease long-term surprise. Our method guarantees full transparency on the decision making, making the interpretation of the results and the troubleshooting effortless.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T15:12:41Z)
• FamiCom: Further Demystifying Prompts for Language Models with Task-Agnostic Performance Estimation [73.454943870226]
  Language models have shown impressive in-context-learning capabilities. We propose a measure called FamiCom, providing a more comprehensive measure for task-agnostic performance estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:14:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.