Query Disambiguation via Answer-Free Context: Doubling Performance on Humanity's Last Exam

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04454v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 19:05:25 GMT
• Title: Query Disambiguation via Answer-Free Context: Doubling Performance on Humanity's Last Exam
• Authors: Michael Majurski, Cynthia Matuszek,
• Abstract summary: This work investigates how the quality of background grounding information in a model's context window affects accuracy.<n>We find that combining well-grounded dynamic context construction (i.e., RAG) with query rewriting reduces question ambiguity, resulting in significant accuracy gains.
• Score: 6.1512837277903785
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How carefully and unambiguously a question is phrased has a profound impact on the quality of the response, for Language Models (LMs) as well as people. While model capabilities continue to advance, the interplay between grounding context and query formulation remains under-explored. This work investigates how the quality of background grounding information in a model's context window affects accuracy. We find that combining well-grounded dynamic context construction (i.e, RAG) with query rewriting reduces question ambiguity, resulting in significant accuracy gains. Given a user question with associated answer-free grounding context, rewriting the question to reduce ambiguity produces benchmark improvements without changing the answer itself, even compared to prepending that context before the question. Using \texttt{gpt-oss-20b} to rewrite a subset of Humanity's Last Exam using answer-free grounding context improves \texttt{gpt-5-mini} accuracy from 0.14 to 0.37. We demonstrate that this accuracy improvement cannot be fully recovered just through prompting at inference time; rather, distinct rewriting and answering phases are required. Code and data are available at https://github.com/mmajurski/lm-rewrite-uplift

Related papers

• Do LLMs Understand Your Translations? Evaluating Paragraph-level MT with Question Answering [68.3400058037817]
  We introduce TREQA (Translation Evaluation via Question-Answering), a framework that extrinsically evaluates translation quality.<n>We show that TREQA is competitive with and, in some cases, outperforms state-of-the-art neural and LLM-based metrics in ranking alternative paragraph-level translations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T09:24:54Z)
• Sufficient Context: A New Lens on Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [19.238772793096473]
  Augmenting LLMs with context leads to improved performance across many applications.<n>We develop a new notion of sufficient context, along with a method to classify instances that have enough information to answer the query.<n>By stratifying errors based on context sufficiency, we find that larger models with higher baseline performance excel at answering queries when the context is sufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T02:13:14Z)
• ELOQ: Resources for Enhancing LLM Detection of Out-of-Scope Questions [52.33835101586687]
  We study out-of-scope questions, where the retrieved document appears semantically similar to the question but lacks the necessary information to answer it.<n>We propose a guided hallucination-based approach ELOQ to automatically generate a diverse set of out-of-scope questions from post-cutoff documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbations [13.897212714309548]
  We study the ability of LLMs to abstain from answering science questions when provided insufficient or incorrect context. We show that performance varies greatly across models, across the type of context provided, and also by question type. Our results imply that changes are needed in QA dataset design and evaluation to more effectively assess the correctness and downstream impacts of model abstention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T18:26:43Z)
• Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context [55.564789967211844]
  An important desideratum of RALMs, is that retrieved information helps model performance when it is relevant. Recent work has shown that retrieval augmentation can sometimes have a negative effect on performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T18:52:35Z)
• Answering Ambiguous Questions via Iterative Prompting [84.3426020642704]
  In open-domain question answering, due to the ambiguity of questions, multiple plausible answers may exist. One approach is to directly predict all valid answers, but this can struggle with balancing relevance and diversity. We present AmbigPrompt to address the imperfections of existing approaches to answering ambiguous questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T04:32:17Z)
• QRelScore: Better Evaluating Generated Questions with Deeper Understanding of Context-aware Relevance [54.48031346496593]
  We propose $textbfQRelScore$, a context-aware evaluation metric for $underlinetextbfRel$evance evaluation metric. Based on off-the-shelf language models such as BERT and GPT2, QRelScore employs both word-level hierarchical matching and sentence-level prompt-based generation. Compared with existing metrics, our experiments demonstrate that QRelScore is able to achieve a higher correlation with human judgments while being much more robust to adversarial samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T07:39:53Z)
• A Semantic-based Method for Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering [40.18557352036813]
  Unsupervised commonsense question answering is appealing since it does not rely on any labeled task data. We present a novel SEmantic-based Question Answering method (SEQA) for unsupervised commonsense question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T08:21:52Z)
• Tell Me How to Ask Again: Question Data Augmentation with Controllable Rewriting in Continuous Space [94.8320535537798]
  Controllable Rewriting based Question Data Augmentation (CRQDA) for machine reading comprehension (MRC), question generation, and question-answering natural language inference tasks. We treat the question data augmentation task as a constrained question rewriting problem to generate context-relevant, high-quality, and diverse question data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T03:13:46Z)
• Robust Question Answering Through Sub-part Alignment [53.94003466761305]
  We model question answering as an alignment problem. We train our model on SQuAD v1.1 and test it on several adversarial and out-of-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:10:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.