Beyond the Context Window: A Cost-Performance Analysis of Fact-Based Memory vs. Long-Context LLMs for Persistent Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04814v1
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 05:01:30 GMT
- Title: Beyond the Context Window: A Cost-Performance Analysis of Fact-Based Memory vs. Long-Context LLMs for Persistent Agents
- Authors: Natchanon Pollertlam, Witchayut Kornsuwannawit,
- Abstract summary: Persistent AI systems face a choice between passing full conversation histories to a long-context large language model (LLM) and maintaining a dedicated memory system that extracts and retrieves structured facts.<n>We compare a fact-based memory system built on the Mem0 framework against long-context LLM inference on three memory-centric benchmarks.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Persistent conversational AI systems face a choice between passing full conversation histories to a long-context large language model (LLM) and maintaining a dedicated memory system that extracts and retrieves structured facts. We compare a fact-based memory system built on the Mem0 framework against long-context LLM inference on three memory-centric benchmarks - LongMemEval, LoCoMo, and PersonaMemv2 - and evaluate both architectures on accuracy and cumulative API cost. Long-context GPT-5-mini achieves higher factual recall on LongMemEval and LoCoMo, while the memory system is competitive on PersonaMemv2, where persona consistency depends on stable, factual attributes suited to flat-typed extraction. We construct a cost model that incorporates prompt caching and show that the two architectures have structurally different cost profiles: long-context inference incurs a per-turn charge that grows with context length even under caching, while the memory system's per-turn read cost remains roughly fixed after a one-time write phase. At a context length of 100k tokens, the memory system becomes cheaper after approximately ten interaction turns, with the break-even point decreasing as context length grows. These results characterize the accuracy-cost trade-off between the two approaches and provide a concrete criterion for selecting between them in production deployments.
Related papers
- EverMemBench: Benchmarking Long-Term Interactive Memory in Large Language Models [16.865998112859604]
We introduce EverMemBench, a benchmark featuring multi-party, multi-group conversations spanning over 1 million tokens.<n>EverMemBench evaluates memory systems across three dimensions through 1,000+ QA pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T16:13:08Z) - Beyond Dialogue Time: Temporal Semantic Memory for Personalized LLM Agents [68.84161689205779]
Temporal Semantic Memory (TSM) is a memory framework that models semantic time for point-wise memory.<n>TSM consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves up to 12.2% absolute improvement in accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T12:24:44Z) - Mem-Gallery: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Conversational Memory for MLLM Agents [76.76004970226485]
Long-term memory is a critical capability for multimodal large language model (MLLM) agents.<n>Mem-Gallery is a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal long-term conversational memory in MLLM agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T02:03:13Z) - Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents [57.38404718635204]
Large language model (LLM) agents face fundamental limitations in long-horizon reasoning due to finite context windows.<n>Existing methods typically handle long-term memory (LTM) and short-term memory (STM) as separate components.<n>We propose Agentic Memory (AgeMem), a unified framework that integrates LTM and STM management directly into the agent's policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T08:24:16Z) - Evaluating Long-Term Memory for Long-Context Question Answering [100.1267054069757]
We present a systematic evaluation of memory-augmented methods using LoCoMo, a benchmark of synthetic long-context dialogues annotated for question-answering tasks.<n>Our findings show that memory-augmented approaches reduce token usage by over 90% while maintaining competitive accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T18:03:50Z) - Multiple Memory Systems for Enhancing the Long-term Memory of Agent [9.43633399280987]
Existing methods, such as MemoryBank and A-MEM, have poor quality of stored memory content.<n>We have designed a multiple memory system inspired by cognitive psychology theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T06:29:42Z) - From Single to Multi-Granularity: Toward Long-Term Memory Association and Selection of Conversational Agents [79.87304940020256]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in conversational agents.<n>MemGAS is a framework that enhances memory consolidation by constructing multi-granularity association, adaptive selection, and retrieval.<n> Experiments on four long-term memory benchmarks demonstrate that MemGAS outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both question answer and retrieval tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T06:13:07Z) - Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory [0.5584627289325719]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable prowess in generating contextually coherent responses.<n>But their fixed context windows pose fundamental challenges for maintaining consistency over prolonged multi-session dialogues.<n>We introduce Mem0, a scalable memory-centric architecture that addresses this issue by dynamically extracting, consolidating, and retrieving salient information from ongoing conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-28T01:46:35Z) - SCM: Enhancing Large Language Model with Self-Controlled Memory Framework [54.33686574304374]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by their inability to process lengthy inputs, resulting in the loss of critical historical information.<n>We propose the Self-Controlled Memory (SCM) framework to enhance the ability of LLMs to maintain long-term memory and recall relevant information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-26T07:25:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.