AI-Assisted Curation of Conference Scholarship: Compiling, Structuring, and Analyzing Two Decades of Presentations at the Society for Social Work and Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06814v1
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 19:19:29 GMT
- Title: AI-Assisted Curation of Conference Scholarship: Compiling, Structuring, and Analyzing Two Decades of Presentations at the Society for Social Work and Research
- Abstract summary: This study developed a comprehensive database of presentation abstracts from the Society for Social Work and Research (SSWR) Annual Conference.<n> Abstract metadata was compiled from the SSWR Confex conference management system for presentations from 2005 to 2026 using web scraping.<n>The database contains 23,793 presentations with 69,924 author records representing 20,779 unique researchers from 4,049 institutions across 93 countries.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Purpose: This study developed a comprehensive database of presentation abstracts from the Society for Social Work and Research (SSWR) Annual Conference and examined patterns in research methodology, authorship, collaboration, and institutional participation over two decades. Method: Abstract metadata was compiled from the SSWR Confex conference management system for presentations from 2005 to 2026 using web scraping. A small language model (gpt-oss:20b) performed classification and extraction tasks on abstracts, including categorization of methodologies and parsing of author affiliations, with human review at each major stage to ensure accuracy. Results: The database contains 23,793 presentations with 69,924 author records representing 20,779 unique researchers from 4,049 institutions across 93 countries. Annual conference presentations increased from 423 in 2005 to 1,935 in 2026, representing a compound annual growth rate of 7.5%. Quantitative methods predominated (61.1%), followed by qualitative approaches (23.4%), mixed methods (9.1%), and reviews (5.4%). The mean number of authors per presentation increased from 2.22 in 2005 to 3.31 in 2026. International participation grew from 4.5% to 13.5% of author affiliations over the observation period. Discussion: Findings indicate substantial growth in SSWR conference participation, alongside increased collaboration and international engagement. The methodological distribution reveals continued quantitative predominance with growing qualitative representation. This database provides research infrastructure for systematic hypothesis testing about research priorities and disciplinary development over time, enabling analyses that inform both scholarship and conference planning.
Related papers
- Deep Academic Survey: Stateful Agentic Closed-Loop Paradigm for Academic Survey Automation [60.151050016855834]
DAS is a stateful agentic framework for generating publication-oriented academic surveys.<n>Its key idea is to separate reusable paper analysis from topic-specific manuscript construction.<n>DAS achieves the highest average in all four dimensions, with an overall score of 4.34 compared with 4.03 for the strongest competitor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-18T17:29:00Z) - From Interpretability to Control: Insights from Six Years of the TrustNLP Workshop [63.00693129203923]
The Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing has grown from 8 proceedings papers to 41 over six editions.<n>We synthesize insights from all 144 proceedings papers, classifying them along six trust dimensions grounded in established frameworks.<n>Analysis from the classification study reveals that truthfulness is the fastest-growing dimension (absent in 2021-2022, comprising 37% of papers by 2025-2026)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T17:30:16Z) - Two Decades of Research at the University of Lagos (2004-2023): A Scientometric Analysis of Productivity, Collaboration, and Impact [0.3093890460224435]
We examine trends in publication volume, collaboration patterns, citation impact, and the most prolific authors, departments, and research domains at the university.<n>The study reveals a consistent increase in research productivity, with the highest publication output recorded in 2023.<n>Health Sciences, Engineering, and Social Sciences are identified as dominant fields, reflecting the university's interdisciplinary research strengths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-06T05:26:17Z) - Position: The Current AI Conference Model is Unsustainable! Diagnosing the Crisis of Centralized AI Conference [40.15553977578515]
This paper offers a data-driven diagnosis of a structural crisis that threatens the foundational goals of scientific dissemination, equity, and community well-being.<n>We identify four key areas of strain: (1) scientifically, with per-author publication rates more than doubling over the past decade to over 4.5 papers annually; (2) environmentally, with the carbon footprint of a single conference exceeding the daily emissions of its host city; and (3) psychologically, with 71% of online community discourse reflecting negative sentiment and 35% referencing mental health concerns.<n>In response, we propose the Community-Federated Conference (CFC) model, which separates peer review, presentation,
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T16:08:27Z) - SciArena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Foundation Models in Scientific Literature Tasks [87.29946641069068]
We present SciArena, an open and collaborative platform for evaluating foundation models on scientific literature tasks.<n>By leveraging collective intelligence, SciArena offers a community-driven evaluation of model performance on open-ended scientific tasks.<n>We release SciArena-Eval, a meta-evaluation benchmark based on our collected preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T17:51:59Z) - Assessing Research Impact in Indian Conference Proceedings: Insights from Collaboration and Citations [1.534667887016089]
This investigation delves into the conference publications indexed by Springer's Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems Series.<n>Among the 570 international conferences held worldwide in this series, 177 were exclusively hosted in India.<n>The study aims to evaluate the research impact of these conference proceedings and identify the primary contributors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-05T08:45:36Z) - Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review [1.6986294649170766]
Generative pretrained transformer models dominate current applications.<n>Industrial adoption remains nascent, with over 90% of studies corresponding to early stage development.<n>Despite the transformative potential of GenAI based RE, several barriers hinder practical adoption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T02:44:39Z) - Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research.
We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023.
Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z) - De-identification of clinical free text using natural language
processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process.
Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z) - Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current
participation practice [143.52578599912326]
We designed a survey to shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis.
The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics.
Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T16:44:46Z) - Recognizing Families In the Wild: White Paper for the 4th Edition Data
Challenge [91.55319616114943]
This paper summarizes the supported tasks (i.e., kinship verification, tri-subject verification, and search & retrieval of missing children) in the Recognizing Families In the Wild (RFIW) evaluation.
The purpose of this paper is to describe the 2020 RFIW challenge, end-to-end, along with forecasts in promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-15T02:22:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.