Exploring the Reasoning Depth of Small Language Models in Software Architecture: A Multidimensional Evaluation Framework Towards Software Engineering 2.0

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07091v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:00:48 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Reasoning Depth of Small Language Models in Software Architecture: A Multidimensional Evaluation Framework Towards Software Engineering 2.0
• Abstract summary: This study benchmarks 10 state-of-the-art Small Language Models (SLMs) on Architectural Decision Records generation.<n>Models above the 3B- parameter threshold demonstrate robust zero-shot capabilities, while sub-2B models show the strongest BERTScore gains from Fine-Tuning.<n>High semantic diversity in off-the-shelf small models often correlates with hallucination rather than productive exploration.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the era of "Software Engineering 2.0" (SE 2.0), where intelligent agents collaborate with human engineers, Generative AI is advancing beyond code generation into Software Architecture (SA). While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate superior capabilities, computational costs and data privacy concerns drive interest in Small Language Models (SLMs) with fewer than 7 billion parameters. However, the reasoning limits of these resource-constrained models remain unexplored. This study benchmarks 10 state-of-the-art SLMs on Architectural Decision Records generation, introducing a multi-dimensional framework evaluating Technical Compliance and Semantic Diversity. Our empirical results reveal a significant reasoning gap: models above the 3B-parameter threshold demonstrate robust zero-shot capabilities, while sub-2B models show the strongest BERTScore gains from Fine-Tuning, though compliance improvements are not guaranteed. Contrary to assumptions regarding context saturation, Few-Shot prompting serves as a highly effective calibration mechanism for select mid-sized models with short context windows. Furthermore, high semantic diversity in off-the-shelf small models often correlates with hallucination rather than productive exploration. These findings establish a rigorous baseline for deploying sustainable, locally hosted architectural assistants.

Related papers

• Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models [62.62160094849002]
  RADIANT is an engineering methodology that combines MDE with Multi-Agent Large Language Models.<n>It automatically generates heterogeneous models across engineering phases.<n>It provides exact, automated change-impact analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T08:50:55Z)
• Benchmarking Requirement-to-Architecture Generation with Hybrid Evaluation [8.867061253116367]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in automating software engineering tasks.<n> Generating software architecture designs from requirement documents is a crucial step in software development.<n>R2ABench is a novel benchmark comprising diverse real-world software projects paired with comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) and expert-curated PlantUML reference diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T04:58:36Z)
• Youtu-LLM: Unlocking the Native Agentic Potential for Lightweight Large Language Models [78.73992315826035]
  We introduce Youtu-LLM, a lightweight language model that harmonizes high computational efficiency with native agentic intelligence.<n>Youtu-LLM is pre-trained from scratch to systematically cultivate reasoning and planning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T04:25:11Z)
• Quantitative Analysis of Technical Debt and Pattern Violation in Large Language Model Architectures [0.0]
  This study presents the first empirical framework to measure "Architectural Erosion" and the accumulation of Technical Debt in AI-synthesized systems.<n>We find that while proprietary models achieve high architectural conformance, open-weights models exhibit critical divergence.<n>These findings suggest that without automated architectural linting, utilizing smaller open-weights models for system scaffolding accelerates the accumulation of structural technical debt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T21:24:02Z)
• PRInTS: Reward Modeling for Long-Horizon Information Seeking [74.14496236655911]
  We introduce PRInTS, a generative PRM trained with dual capabilities.<n>We show that PRInTS enhances information-seeking abilities of open-source models as well as specialized agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T17:09:43Z)
• SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models [59.90381306452982]
  evaluating large language models (LLMs) for software engineering has been limited by narrow task coverage, language bias, and insufficient alignment with real-world developer.<n>We introduce SWE-1, a comprehensive benchmark that unifies heterogeneous code-related evaluations into a structured and production-aligned framework.<n>SWE- spans 8 task types, 8 programming scenarios, and 10 programming languages, with 2000 high-quality instances curated from authentic GitHub pull requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T18:01:32Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [59.61734783818073]
  The period from 2019 to the present has represented one of the biggest paradigm shifts in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP)<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude with a forward-looking discussion of emerging challenges and future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.