The Third Ambition: Artificial Intelligence and the Science of Human Behavior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07329v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 20:21:58 GMT
• Title: The Third Ambition: Artificial Intelligence and the Science of Human Behavior
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are trained on unprecedented volumes of human-produced text.<n>LLMs encode large-scale regularities in how people argue, justify, narrate, and negotiate norms across social domains.<n>The paper situates this third ambition within long-standing traditions of computational social science.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Contemporary artificial intelligence research has been organized around two dominant ambitions: productivity, which treats AI systems as tools for accelerating work and economic output, and alignment, which focuses on ensuring that increasingly capable systems behave safely and in accordance with human values. This paper articulates and develops a third, emerging ambition: the use of large language models (LLMs) as scientific instruments for studying human behavior, culture, and moral reasoning. Trained on unprecedented volumes of human-produced text, LLMs encode large-scale regularities in how people argue, justify, narrate, and negotiate norms across social domains. We argue that these models can be understood as condensates of human symbolic behavior, compressed, generative representations that render patterns of collective discourse computationally accessible. The paper situates this third ambition within long-standing traditions of computational social science, content analysis, survey research, and comparative-historical inquiry, while clarifying the epistemic limits of treating model output as evidence. We distinguish between base models and fine-tuned systems, showing how alignment interventions can systematically reshape or obscure the cultural regularities learned during pretraining, and we identify instruct-only and modular adaptation regimes as pragmatic compromises for behavioral research. We review emerging methodological approaches including prompt-based experiments, synthetic population sampling, comparative-historical modeling, and ablation studies and show how each maps onto familiar social-scientific designs while operating at unprecedented scale.

Related papers

• Human-Centric Intelligence in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey [159.29291047252138]
  Human-centric intelligence is evolving in the foundation-model era, with growing emphasis on scale, transferability, and general-purpose modeling.<n>Recent advances across this broad landscape remain fragmented across tasks, modalities, and research communities, leaving their intrinsic conceptual and methodological connections unclear.<n>To bridge these divides and rethink human-centric intelligence in the foundation-model era, we introduce a full-spectrum human context taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T08:12:40Z)
• Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond [209.35045331678043]
  We introduce a "levels x laws" taxonomy organized along two axes.<n>The first defines three capability levels: L1 Predictor, which learns one-step local transition operators; L2 Simulator, which composes them into multi-step, action-conditioned rollouts that respect domain laws; and L3 Evolver, which autonomously revises its own model when predictions fail against new evidence.<n>We synthesize over 400 works and summarize more than 100 representative systems spanning model-based reinforcement learning, video generation, web and GUI agents, multi-agent social simulation, and AI-driven scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T17:48:47Z)
• Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods [11.53401872925025]
  We argue that spatial ability is not solely determined by the input format.<n>Our survey introduces a taxonomy that organizes spatial intelligence from cognitive aspect.<n>We analyze methods for improving spatial ability, spanning both training-based and reasoning-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T02:43:17Z)
• The Emergence of Social Science of Large Language Models [0.8582203861502194]
  The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform human activity and institutions.<n>LLMs as Social Minds examines whether and when models display behaviors that elicit attributions of cognition, morality and bias, while addressing challenges such as test leakage and surface cues.<n>LLMs as Human Interactions examines how LLMs reshape tasks, learning, trust, work and governance, and how risks arise at the human-AI interface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T14:55:14Z)
• Modeling Open-World Cognition as On-Demand Synthesis of Probabilistic Models [93.1043186636177]
  We explore the hypothesis that people use a combination of distributed and symbolic representations to construct bespoke mental models tailored to novel situations.<n>We propose a computational implementation of this idea -- a Model Synthesis Architecture''<n>We evaluate our MSA as a model of human judgments on a novel reasoning dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T18:01:03Z)
• Evaluating AI Alignment in Eleven LLMs through Output-Based Analysis and Human Benchmarking [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in psychological research and practice, yet traditional benchmarks reveal little about the values they express in real interaction.<n>We introduce PAPERS, output-based evaluation of the values LLMs express.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z)
• Adaptive Token Boundaries: Integrating Human Chunking Mechanisms into Multimodal LLMs [0.0]
  This research presents a systematic investigation into the parallels between human cross-modal chunking mechanisms and token representation methodologies.<n>We propose a novel framework for dynamic cross-modal tokenization that incorporates adaptive boundaries, hierarchical representations, and alignment mechanisms grounded in cognitive science principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T09:14:24Z)
• Human-Centric Foundation Models: Perception, Generation and Agentic Modeling [79.97999901785772]
  Human-centric Foundation Models unify diverse human-centric tasks into a single framework.<n>We present a comprehensive overview of HcFMs by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes current approaches into four groups.<n>This survey aims to serve as a roadmap for researchers and practitioners working towards more robust, versatile, and intelligent digital human and embodiments modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T16:38:40Z)
• Political Bias in LLMs: Unaligned Moral Values in Agent-centric Simulations [0.0]
  We investigate how personalized language models align with human responses on the Moral Foundation Theory Questionnaire.<n>We adapt open-source generative language models to different political personas and repeatedly survey these models to generate synthetic data sets.<n>Our analysis reveals that models produce inconsistent results across multiple repetitions, yielding high response variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T08:20:41Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
  We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology. We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z)
• Predicting the long-term collective behaviour of fish pairs with deep learning [52.83927369492564]
  This study introduces a deep learning model to assess social interactions in the fish species Hemigrammus rhodostomus. We compare the results of our deep learning approach to experiments and to the results of a state-of-the-art analytical model. We demonstrate that machine learning models social interactions can directly compete with their analytical counterparts in subtle experimental observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T05:25:03Z)
• Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples [3.278541277919869]
  We show that the "algorithmic bias" within one such tool -- the GPT-3 language model -- is both fine-grained and demographically correlated. We create "silicon samples" by conditioning the model on thousands of socio-demographic backstories from real human participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T19:53:32Z)
• Human Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds: A Deep Learning Perspective [89.4600982169]
  We present an in-depth analysis of existing deep learning-based methods for modelling social interactions. We propose two knowledge-based data-driven methods to effectively capture these social interactions. We develop a large scale interaction-centric benchmark TrajNet++, a significant yet missing component in the field of human trajectory forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T17:19:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.