Emergence is Overrated: AGI as an Archipelago of Experts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07979v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 05:28:16 GMT
• Title: Emergence is Overrated: AGI as an Archipelago of Experts
• Abstract summary: Krakauer, Krakauer, and Mitchell (2025) distinguish between emergent capabilities and emergent intelligence.<n>This paper examines whether their framework accurately characterizes human intelligence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Krakauer, Krakauer, and Mitchell (2025) distinguish between emergent capabilities and emergent intelligence, arguing that true intelligence requires efficient coarse-grained representations enabling diverse problem-solving through analogy and minimal modification. They contend that intelligence means doing "more with less" through compression and generalization, contrasting this with "vast assemblages of diverse calculators" that merely accumulate specialized capabilities. This paper examines whether their framework accurately characterizes human intelligence and its implications for conceptualizing artificial general intelligence. Drawing on empirical evidence from cognitive science, I demonstrate that human expertise operates primarily through domain-specific pattern accumulation rather than elegant compression. Expert performance appears flexible not through unifying principles but through vast repertoires of specialized responses. Creative breakthroughs themselves may emerge through evolutionary processes of blind variation and selective retention rather than principled analogical reasoning. These findings suggest reconceptualizing AGI as an "archipelago of experts": isolated islands of specialized competence without unifying principles or shared representations. If we accept human expertise with its characteristic brittleness as genuine intelligence, then consistency demands recognizing that artificial systems comprising millions of specialized modules could constitute general intelligence despite lacking KKM's emergent intelligence.

Related papers

• Monotropic Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Cognitive Taxonomy of Domain-Specialized Language Models [0.0]
  We argue that intense specialization represents not a limitation but an alternative cognitive architecture with distinct advantages for safety-critical applications.<n>Our framework challenges the implicit assumption that artificial general intelligence constitutes the sole legitimate aspiration of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T22:30:03Z)
• Modularity is the Bedrock of Natural and Artificial Intelligence [51.60091394435895]
  modularity has been shown to be critical for supporting the efficient learning and strong generalization abilities.<n>Despite its role in natural intelligence and its demonstrated benefits across a range of seemingly disparate AI subfields, modularity remains relatively underappreciated in mainstream AI research.<n>In particular, we examine what computational advantages modularity provides, how it has emerged as a solution across several AI research areas, and how modularity can help bridge the gap between natural and artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-21T21:47:09Z)
• A Definition of AGI [208.25193480759026]
  The lack of a concrete definition for Artificial General Intelligence obscures the gap between today's specialized AI and human-level cognition.<n>This paper introduces a quantifiable framework to address this, defining AGI as matching the cognitive versatility and proficiency of a well-educated adult.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T01:28:35Z)
• Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training [86.70255651945602]
  We introduce a novel inference-time steering methodology called Reinforcing Cognitive Experts (RICE)<n>RICE aims to improve reasoning performance without additional training or complexs.<n> Empirical evaluations with leading MoE-based LRMs demonstrate noticeable and consistent improvements in reasoning accuracy, cognitive efficiency, and cross-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T17:59:16Z)
• Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems [132.77459963706437]
  This book provides a comprehensive overview, framing intelligent agents within modular, brain-inspired architectures.<n>It explores self-enhancement and adaptive evolution mechanisms, exploring how agents autonomously refine their capabilities.<n>It also examines the collective intelligence emerging from agent interactions, cooperation, and societal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:00:29Z)
• The Trap of Presumed Equivalence: Artificial General Intelligence Should Not Be Assessed on the Scale of Human Intelligence [0.0]
  A traditional approach to assessing emerging intelligence in the theory of intelligent systems is based on the similarity, "imitation" of human-like actions and behaviors. We argue that under some natural assumptions, developing intelligent systems will be able to form their own intents and objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:39:58Z)
• On a Functional Definition of Intelligence [0.0]
  Without an agreed-upon definition of intelligence, asking "is this system intelligent?"" is an untestable question. Most work on precisely capturing what we mean by "intelligence" has come from the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. We present an argument for a purely functional, black-box definition of intelligence, distinct from how that intelligence is actually achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:46:49Z)
• Beyond Interpretable Benchmarks: Contextual Learning through Cognitive and Multimodal Perception [0.0]
  This study contends that the Turing Test is misinterpreted as an attempt to anthropomorphize computer systems. It emphasizes tacit learning as a cornerstone of general-purpose intelligence, despite its lack of overt interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-04T08:30:04Z)
• Kernel Based Cognitive Architecture for Autonomous Agents [91.3755431537592]
  This paper considers an evolutionary approach to creating a cognitive functionality. We consider a cognitive architecture which ensures the evolution of the agent on the basis of Symbol Emergence Problem solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T12:41:32Z)
• Hierarchical principles of embodied reinforcement learning: A review [11.613306236691427]
  We show that all important cognitive mechanisms have been implemented independently in isolated computational architectures. We expect our results to guide the development of more sophisticated cognitively inspired hierarchical methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T10:19:38Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.