Pareto-Optimal Anytime Algorithms via Bayesian Racing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08493v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:28:39 GMT
• Title: Pareto-Optimal Anytime Algorithms via Bayesian Racing
• Abstract summary: We introduce PolarBear (Pareto-optimal anytime algorithms via Bayesian racing), a framework for anytime algorithm comparison.<n>Our approach requires no bounds, no normalization, and aggregates coherently across arbitrary instance distributions without requiring known optima.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Selecting an optimization algorithm requires comparing candidates across problem instances, but the computational budget for deployment is often unknown at benchmarking time. Current methods either collapse anytime performance into a scalar, require manual interpretation of plots, or produce conclusions that change when algorithms are added or removed. Moreover, methods based on raw objective values require normalization, which needs bounds or optima that are often unavailable and breaks coherent aggregation across instances. We propose a framework that formulates anytime algorithm comparison as Pareto optimization over time: an algorithm is non-dominated if no competitor beats it at every timepoint. By using rankings rather than objective values, our approach requires no bounds, no normalization, and aggregates coherently across arbitrary instance distributions without requiring known optima. We introduce PolarBear (Pareto-optimal anytime algorithms via Bayesian racing), a procedure that identifies the anytime Pareto set through adaptive sampling with calibrated uncertainty. Bayesian inference over a temporal Plackett-Luce ranking model provides posterior beliefs about pairwise dominance, enabling early elimination of confidently dominated algorithms. The output Pareto set together with the posterior supports downstream algorithm selection under arbitrary time preferences and risk profiles without additional experiments.

Related papers

• Pathwise optimization for bridge-type estimators and its applications [49.1574468325115]
  Pathwise methods allow to efficiently compute the full path for penalized estimators.<n>We apply these algorithms to the penalized estimation of processes observed at discrete times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T10:38:29Z)
• Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimization [16.921694787482213]
  A generic online learning algorithm is developed for a class of ''monotone'' problems.<n>Our framework applies to several fundamental problems such as prophet inequality, Pandora's box, single-resource revenue management and posted pricing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T07:46:37Z)
• Accelerated First-Order Optimization under Nonlinear Constraints [61.98523595657983]
  We exploit between first-order algorithms for constrained optimization and non-smooth systems to design a new class of accelerated first-order algorithms.<n>An important property of these algorithms is that constraints are expressed in terms of velocities instead of sparse variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T08:50:48Z)
• Formalizing Preferences Over Runtime Distributions [25.899669128438322]
  We use a utility-theoretic approach to characterize the scoring functions that describe preferences over algorithms. We show how to leverage a maximum-entropy approach for modeling underspecified captime distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T19:43:48Z)
• Machine Learning for Online Algorithm Selection under Censored Feedback [71.6879432974126]
  In online algorithm selection (OAS), instances of an algorithmic problem class are presented to an agent one after another, and the agent has to quickly select a presumably best algorithm from a fixed set of candidate algorithms. For decision problems such as satisfiability (SAT), quality typically refers to the algorithm's runtime. In this work, we revisit multi-armed bandit algorithms for OAS and discuss their capability of dealing with the problem. We adapt them towards runtime-oriented losses, allowing for partially censored data while keeping a space- and time-complexity independent of the time horizon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T18:10:52Z)
• Adaptive and Universal Algorithms for Variational Inequalities with Optimal Convergence [29.189409618561964]
  We develop new adaptive algorithms for variational inequalities with monotone operators. Our algorithms automatically adapt to unknown problem parameters. We show that our algorithms are universal and simultaneously achieve the optimal convergence rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T14:44:26Z)
• Single-Timescale Stochastic Nonconvex-Concave Optimization for Smooth Nonlinear TD Learning [145.54544979467872]
  We propose two single-timescale single-loop algorithms that require only one data point each step. Our results are expressed in a form of simultaneous primal and dual side convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T20:36:49Z)
• Run2Survive: A Decision-theoretic Approach to Algorithm Selection based on Survival Analysis [75.64261155172856]
  survival analysis (SA) naturally supports censored data and offers appropriate ways to use such data for learning distributional models of algorithm runtime. We leverage such models as a basis of a sophisticated decision-theoretic approach to algorithm selection, which we dub Run2Survive. In an extensive experimental study with the standard benchmark ASlib, our approach is shown to be highly competitive and in many cases even superior to state-of-the-art AS approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T15:20:17Z)
• Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Time [74.47681868973598]
  We study the problem of minimizing the population loss given i.i.d. samples from a distribution over convex loss functions. A recent work of Bassily et al. has established the optimal bound on the excess population loss achievable given $n$ samples. We describe two new techniques for deriving convex optimization algorithms both achieving the optimal bound on excess loss and using $O(minn, n2/d)$ gradient computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T19:52:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.