Evaluating Financial Intelligence in Large Language Models: Benchmarking SuperInvesting AI with LLM Engines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08704v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 17:58:54 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Financial Intelligence in Large Language Models: Benchmarking SuperInvesting AI with LLM Engines
• Abstract summary: We introduce the AI Financial Intelligence Benchmark (AFIB), a multi-dimensional evaluation framework designed to assess financial analysis capabilities.<n>We evaluate five AI systems: GPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and SuperInvesting, using a dataset of 95+ structured financial analysis questions.<n>SuperInvesting achieves the highest aggregate performance, with an average factual accuracy score of 8.96/10 and the highest completeness score of 56.65/70.
• Score: 1.1455937444848387
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used for financial analysis and investment research, yet systematic evaluation of their financial reasoning capabilities remains limited. In this work, we introduce the AI Financial Intelligence Benchmark (AFIB), a multi-dimensional evaluation framework designed to assess financial analysis capabilities across five dimensions: factual accuracy, analytical completeness, data recency, model consistency, and failure patterns. We evaluate five AI systems: GPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and SuperInvesting, using a dataset of 95+ structured financial analysis questions derived from real-world equity research tasks. The results reveal substantial differences in performance across models. Within this benchmark setting, SuperInvesting achieves the highest aggregate performance, with an average factual accuracy score of 8.96/10 and the highest completeness score of 56.65/70, while also demonstrating the lowest hallucination rate among evaluated systems. Retrieval-oriented systems such as Perplexity perform strongly on data recency tasks due to live information access but exhibit weaker analytical synthesis and consistency. Overall, the results highlight that financial intelligence in large language models is inherently multi-dimensional, and systems that combine structured financial data access with analytical reasoning capabilities provide the most reliable performance for complex investment research workflows.

Related papers

• FinDeepIndicator: Benchmarking Deep Research Agents in End-to-End Financial Indicator Construction [57.909515451254855]
  FinDeepIndicator is the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating Deep Research (DR) agents in end-to-end financial indicator construction.<n>It evaluates DR agents across four stages in indicator construction: formula specification, data collection, indicator calculation, and answer generation.<n>It contains 3,350 curated question-answer pairs derived from both U.S. and Chinese markets, 10 years of historical financial data, and 800 listed companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T16:54:41Z)
• AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark [62.45908988324612]
  AIDABench is a benchmark for evaluating AI systems on complex data analytics tasks in an end-to-end manner.<n>AIDABench encompasses 600+ diverse document analysis tasks across three core capability dimensions: question answering, data visualization, and file generation.<n>We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art models on AIDABench, spanning both proprietary (e.g., Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro Preview) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-Max-2026-01-23-Thinking) families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:58:05Z)
• UniFinEval: Towards Unified Evaluation of Financial Multimodal Models across Text, Images and Videos [22.530796761115766]
  We propose UniFinEval, the first unified multimodal benchmark for high-information-density financial environments.<n>UniFinEval systematically constructs five core financial scenarios grounded in real-world financial systems.<n> Gemini-3-pro-preview achieves the best overall performance, yet still exhibits a substantial gap compared to financial experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T10:15:32Z)
• CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency [60.83660377169452]
  This paper introduces CryptoBench, the first expert-curated, dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the real-world capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>Unlike general-purpose agent benchmarks for search and prediction, professional crypto analysis presents specific challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:52:34Z)
• FinSight: Towards Real-World Financial Deep Research [68.31086471310773]
  FinSight is a novel framework for producing high-quality, multimodal financial reports.<n>To ensure professional-grade visualization, we propose an Iterative Vision-Enhanced Mechanism.<n>A two-stage Writing Framework expands concise Chain-of-Analysis segments into coherent, citation-aware, and multimodal reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T14:05:35Z)
• FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysis [110.5695516127813]
  HisRubric is a novel evaluation framework with a hierarchical analytical structure and a fine-grained grading rubric.<n>FinDeepResearch is a benchmark that comprises 64 listed companies from 8 financial markets across 4 languages.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on the FinDeepResearch using 16 representative methods, including 6 DR agents, 5 LLMs equipped with both deep reasoning and search capabilities, and 5 LLMs with deep reasoning capabilities only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T17:21:56Z)
• FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning [30.252244345152956]
  FinSearchComp is the first fully open-source benchmark for realistic, open-domain financial search and reasoning.<n>The benchmark includes 635 questions spanning global and Greater China markets.<n>Grok 4 (web) tops the global subset, approaching expert-level accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T15:13:13Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Financial Reasoning: A CFA-Based Benchmark Study [1.6770212301915661]
  This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs using 1,560 multiple-choice questions from official mock exams across Levels I-III of CFA.<n>We compare models distinguished by core design priorities: multi-modal and computationally powerful, reasoning-specialized and highly accurate, and lightweight efficiency-optimized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T06:13:21Z)
• Agentar-Fin-R1: Enhancing Financial Intelligence through Domain Expertise, Training Efficiency, and Advanced Reasoning [12.548390779247987]
  We introduce the Agentar-Fin-R1 series of financial large language models.<n>Our optimization approach integrates a high-quality, systematic financial task label system.<n>Our models undergo comprehensive evaluation on mainstream financial benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T17:52:16Z)
• FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation [65.04104723843264]
  We present FinDER, an expert-generated dataset tailored for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in finance.<n>FinDER focuses on annotating search-relevant evidence by domain experts, offering 5,703 query-evidence-answer triplets.<n>By challenging models to retrieve relevant information from large corpora, FinDER offers a more realistic benchmark for evaluating RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T11:30:13Z)
• FinanceQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Financial Analysis Capabilities of Large Language Models [0.0]
  FinanceQA is a testing suite that evaluates LLMs' performance on complex numerical financial analysis tasks that mirror real-world investment work.<n>Current LLMs fail to meet the strict accuracy requirements of financial institutions, with models failing approximately 60% of realistic tasks.<n>Results show that higher-quality training data is needed to support such tasks, which we experiment with using OpenAI's fine-tuning API.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T00:06:55Z)
• FISHNET: Financial Intelligence from Sub-querying, Harmonizing, Neural-Conditioning, Expert Swarms, and Task Planning [2.616867378362811]
  FISHNET is an agentic architecture that accomplishes highly complex analytical tasks for more than 98,000 regulatory filings. FISHNET shows remarkable performance for financial insight generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T17:53:47Z)
• PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Finance [63.51545277822702]
  PIXIU is a comprehensive framework including the first financial large language model (LLMs) based on fine-tuning LLaMA with instruction data. We propose FinMA by fine-tuning LLaMA with the constructed dataset to be able to follow instructions for various financial tasks. We conduct a detailed analysis of FinMA and several existing LLMs, uncovering their strengths and weaknesses in handling critical financial tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T14:20:29Z)
• FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data [52.7249610894623]
  We focus on answering deep questions over financial data, aiming to automate the analysis of a large corpus of financial documents. We propose a new large-scale dataset, FinQA, with Question-Answering pairs over Financial reports, written by financial experts. The results demonstrate that popular, large, pre-trained models fall far short of expert humans in acquiring finance knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T00:08:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.