Hindsight Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08754v1
- Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 06:05:20 GMT
- Title: Hindsight Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
- Abstract summary: We introduce HCAPO, the first framework to integrate hindsight credit assignment into Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n> Evaluations across three benchmarks, including WebShop and ALFWorld, demonstrate that HCAPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RL methods.<n>These results indicate that HCAPO significantly enhances exploration efficiency, promotes concise decision-making, and ensures scalability in complex, long-horizon tasks.
- Score: 25.156923297108836
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents often face significant credit assignment challenges in long-horizon, multi-step tasks due to sparse rewards. Existing value-free methods, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), encounter two fundamental bottlenecks: inaccurate step-level Q-value estimation and misaligned value baselines for intermediate states. To address these limitations, we introduce HCAPO, the first framework to integrate hindsight credit assignment into LLM agents. HCAPO leverages the LLM itself as a post-hoc critic to refine step-level Q-values through hindsight reasoning. Furthermore, HCAPO's multi-scale advantage mechanism effectively supplements the inaccurate value baselines at critical decision states. Evaluations across three challenging benchmarks, including WebShop and ALFWorld, demonstrate that HCAPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RL methods. Notably, HCAPO achieves a 7.7% improvement in success rate on WebShop and a 13.8% on ALFWorld over GRPO using the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model. These results indicate that HCAPO significantly enhances exploration efficiency, promotes concise decision-making, and ensures scalability in complex, long-horizon tasks.
Related papers
- HISPO: Hierarchical Importance-Sampling Policy Optimization with Entropy-Derived Segments [3.6883184884620004]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a central approach for improving mathematical reasoning in language models.<n>Long-form completions introduce a difficult credit-assignment problem: different parts of a solution trace may contribute unevenly to final correctness.<n>We introduce Hierarchical Importance-Sampling Policy Optimization (HISPO), a segment-level policy-optimization method that constructs rollout-time entropy-derived contiguous segments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T12:29:00Z) - TRCA: Transition-wise Rubric Credit Assignment for Long-horizon LLM Agents [22.01777615106231]
Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are typically optimized with sparse terminal outcomes.<n>We propose Transition-wise Credit Assignment, which derives step-level supervision directly from action-induced transitions.<n>Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and seven search-augmented question-answering benchmarks show consistent improvements over the evaluated baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T06:19:12Z) - AgentOPSD: Recursive Self-Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [58.76655851910778]
AgentOPSD is a critic-free, recursive method for turn-level credit assignment in agentic reinforcement learning.<n>We evaluate AgentOPSD on ALFWorld, WebShop, and Search-QA using Qwen2.5 models at two scales (3B and 7B)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T13:00:59Z) - Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routing [79.88256756334327]
Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO) addresses this by providing denser, more targeted logit-level supervision.<n>We propose Sample-Routed Policy Optimization (SRPO)<n>SRPO routes correct samples to GRPO's reward-aligned reinforcement and failed samples to SDPO's targeted logit-level correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T17:29:18Z) - Verified Critical Step Optimization for LLM Agents [67.05296684575445]
Critical Step Optimization focuses preference learning on verified critical steps.<n>Method starts from failed policy trajectories rather than expert demonstrations.<n>Experiments on GAIA-Text-103 and XBench-DeepSearch show that CSO achieves 37% and 26% relative improvement over the SFT baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T11:41:02Z) - Enhancing Agentic RL with Progressive Reward Shaping and Value-based Sampling Policy Optimization [13.475938754147625]
Large Language Models (LLMs) empowered with Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) can iteratively plan, call external tools, and integrate returned information to solve complex, long-horizon reasoning tasks.<n>Agentic Reinforcement Learning (Agentic RL) optimize such models over full tool-interaction trajectories.<n>Two key challenges hinder effectiveness: (1) Sparse, non-instructive rewards, such as binary 0-1 verifiable signals, provide limited guidance for intermediate steps and slow convergence.<n>We propose two complementary techniques: Progressive Reward Shaping (PRS) and Value-based Sampling Policy Optimization (VSPO).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-08T11:59:25Z) - Pinpointing crucial steps: Attribution-based Credit Assignment for Verifiable Reinforcement Learning [5.880405013005892]
ACPO is a phased framework that incorporates a difficulty-aware curriculum.<n>ACPO improves exploration by using trajectory semantic segmentation and an attribution-based representation.<n>It enhances exploitation with a factorized reward system that precisely quantifies the hierarchical contribution of each reasoning step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T01:22:55Z) - CAPO: Towards Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Generative Credit Assignment [44.33395106709674]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by using rule-based binary feedback.<n>Current RLVR methods typically assign the same reward to every token.<n>This coarse-grained feedback hampers precise credit assignment, making it hard for models to identify which reasoning steps lead to success or failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T11:06:08Z) - Enhancing Decision-Making of Large Language Models via Actor-Critic [28.870961806283425]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural language processing tasks.<n>Existing methods either rely on short-term auto-regressive action generation or face limitations in accurately simulating rollouts and assessing outcomes.<n>This paper introduces a novel LLM-based Actor-Critic framework, termed LAC, that effectively improves LLM policies with long-term action evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T14:58:27Z) - Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedback [59.078756231841574]
Critique-GRPO is an online RL framework that integrates both natural language and numerical feedback for effective policy optimization.<n>We show Critique-GRPO consistently outperforms supervised learning and RL-based fine-tuning methods across eight challenging mathematical, STEM, and general reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T17:39:02Z) - Control Large Language Models via Divide and Conquer [94.48784966256463]
This paper investigates controllable generation for large language models (LLMs) with prompt-based control, focusing on Lexically Constrained Generation (LCG)
We evaluate the performance of LLMs on satisfying lexical constraints with prompt-based control, as well as their efficacy in downstream applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T21:20:06Z) - VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs [66.80143024475635]
We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.<n>Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.