An Analysis of Modern Web Security Vulnerabilities Inside WebAssembly Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09426v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:39:19 GMT
• Title: An Analysis of Modern Web Security Vulnerabilities Inside WebAssembly Applications
• Abstract summary: We show that binary vulnerabilities, such as Buffer Overflows and Use After Free, remain a present danger for WASM binaries.<n>Our work aims to demonstrate that such vulnerabilities, when occurring on a WebAssembly module, can affect the behavior of a web application in unexpected ways.
• Score: 1.6916040234975795
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growth in the adoption of the WebAssembly (WASM) standard has given rise to a rapidly increasing landscape of binary applications that are natively ported to the environment of websites. The flexibility of WASM has made it the preferred way to run fast and resource-heavy applications, replacing a field that JavaScript previously monopolized. Despite its success, researchers have raised concerns over the security implementations of WASM, demonstrating that binary vulnerabilities, such as Buffer Overflows and Use After Free, remain a present danger for WASM binaries. Our work aims to demonstrate that such vulnerabilities, when occurring on a WebAssembly module, can affect the behavior of a web application in unexpected ways, enabling an attacker to exploit vulnerabilities that are typical of the web security landscape. We provide several scenarios to provide examples of how each binary vulnerability might lead to a web security vulnerability, such as SQL Injections, XS-Leaks, and SSTI. Our results show that binary vulnerabilities can invalidate common security mechanisms that web developer implement in their applications, demonstrating how the security of WASM modules remains a problem that needs to be addressed. We also provide a list of best practices and defensive strategies that developers can implement to mitigate the risks associated with running unsafe WASM modules in their web applications.

Related papers

• ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks? [92.21756459993695]
  Exploitation is a challenging task because it requires low-level program reasoning.<n>Despite its importance and diagnostic value, exploitation remains under-evaluated.<n>We introduce ExploitGym, a large-scale, diverse, realistic benchmark on the exploitation capabilities of AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T18:00:14Z)
• HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilities [20.201614123811872]
  HackWorld is the first framework for evaluating computer-use agents' capabilities to exploit web application vulnerabilities via visual interaction.<n>It includes 36 real-world applications across 11 frameworks and 7 languages, featuring realistic flaws such as injection vulnerabilities, authentication bypasses, and unsafe input handling.<n>It tests CUAs' capacity to identify and exploit these weaknesses while navigating complex web interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T06:52:15Z)
• SPARE: Securing Progressive Web Applications Against Unauthorized Replications [1.1174586184779578]
  Malicious developers can exploit Progressive Web Applications by duplicating PWA web links to create counterfeit native apps.<n>We propose a query parameter-based practical security solution to defend against or mitigate such attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-09T17:40:13Z)
• SafeAgent: Safeguarding LLM Agents via an Automated Risk Simulator [77.86600052899156]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in real-world applications.<n>We propose AutoSafe, the first framework that systematically enhances agent safety through fully automated synthetic data generation.<n>We show that AutoSafe boosts safety scores by 45% on average and achieves a 28.91% improvement on real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T10:56:06Z)
• The Hidden Dangers of Browsing AI Agents [0.0]
  This paper presents a comprehensive security evaluation of such agents, focusing on systemic vulnerabilities across multiple architectural layers.<n>Our work outlines the first end-to-end threat model for browsing agents and provides actionable guidance for securing their deployment in real-world environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T13:10:29Z)
• DoomArena: A framework for Testing AI Agents Against Evolving Security Threats [81.73540246946015]
  We present DoomArena, a security evaluation framework for AI agents.<n>It is a plug-in framework and integrates easily into realistic agentic frameworks.<n>It is modular and decouples the development of attacks from details of the environment in which the agent is deployed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T20:36:10Z)
• CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities [6.752938800468733]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of autonomously conducting cyberattacks.<n>Existing benchmarks fall short as they are limited to abstracted Capture the Flag competitions or lack comprehensive coverage.<n>We introduce CVE-Bench, a real-world cybersecurity benchmark based on critical-severity Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:32:32Z)
• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [104.94706600050557]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community.<n>We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts.<n>Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• WebAssembly and Security: a review [0.8962460460173961]
  We analyze 121 papers by identifying seven different security categories. We aim to fill this gap by proposing a comprehensive review of research works dealing with security in WebAssembly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T03:37:28Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection [64.67495502772866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. We show how attackers can override original instructions and employed controls using Prompt Injection attacks. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T17:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.