Context Engineering: From Prompts to Corporate Multi-Agent Architecture

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09619v2
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 03:59:39 GMT
• Title: Context Engineering: From Prompts to Corporate Multi-Agent Architecture
• Abstract summary: The paper proposes five context quality criteria: relevance, sufficiency, isolation, economy, and provenance, and frames context as the agent's operating system.<n>Intent engineering encodes organizational goals, values, and trade-off hierarchies into agent infrastructure.<n> Specification engineering creates a machine-readable corpus of corporate policies and standards enabling autonomous operation of multi-agent systems at scale.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems evolve from stateless chatbots to autonomous multi-step agents, prompt engineering (PE), the discipline of crafting individual queries, proves necessary but insufficient. This paper introduces context engineering (CE) as a standalone discipline concerned with designing, structuring, and managing the entire informational environment in which an AI agent makes decisions. Drawing on vendor architectures (Google ADK, Anthropic, LangChain), current academic work (ACE framework, Google DeepMind's intelligent delegation), enterprise research (Deloitte, 2026; KPMG, 2026), and the author's experience building a multi-agent system, the paper proposes five context quality criteria: relevance, sufficiency, isolation, economy, and provenance, and frames context as the agent's operating system. Two higher-order disciplines follow. Intent engineering (IE) encodes organizational goals, values, and trade-off hierarchies into agent infrastructure. Specification engineering (SE) creates a machine-readable corpus of corporate policies and standards enabling autonomous operation of multi-agent systems at scale. Together these four disciplines form a cumulative pyramid maturity model of agent engineering, in which each level subsumes the previous one as a necessary foundation. Enterprise data reveals a gap: while 75% of enterprises plan agentic AI deployment within two years (Deloitte, 2026), deployment has surged and retreated as organizations confront scaling complexity (KPMG, 2026). The Klarna case illustrates a dual deficit, contextual and intentional. Whoever controls the agent's context controls its behavior; whoever controls its intent controls its strategy; whoever controls its specifications controls its scale.

Related papers

• Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence [115.91847478507736]
  LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks.<n>Many tasks require heterogeneous expertise, interdependent subtasks, parallel execution, independent verification, and persistent state.<n>We call this System Intelligence: an agent system's ability to organize and coordinate multiple intelligent components into a coherent, adaptive whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T14:27:57Z)
• The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI [0.0]
  We argue that agentic AI governance is four problems, not one, each with a mature governing science.<n>We formalize each layer, derive cross-layer coupling conditions, and trace twenty-plus enterprise controls to their classical constructs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T19:10:31Z)
• When Agents Evolve, Institutions Follow [52.359340707289114]
  We argue that multi-agent systems built on large language models face the same challenge.<n>Their central problem is not only individual intelligence, but collective organization.<n>We translate seven historical political institutions, spanning four canonical governance patterns, into executable multi-agent architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T10:30:58Z)
• SemaClaw: A Step Towards General-Purpose Personal AI Agents through Harness Engineering [17.924525595609833]
  Rise of OpenClaw in early 2026 marks the moment when millions of users began deploying personal AI agents into their daily lives.<n>We present SemaClaw, an open-source multi-agent application framework that addresses these shifts by taking a step towards general-purpose personal AI agents through harness engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T14:37:53Z)
• Agyn: A Multi-Agent System for Team-Based Autonomous Software Engineering [0.09046463333989574]
  Real-world software development is organized as a collaborative activity carried out by teams following shared methodologies.<n>We present a fully automated multi-agent system that explicitly models software engineering as an organizational process.<n>Our results suggest that replicating team structure, methodology, and communication is a powerful paradigm for autonomous software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T22:17:19Z)
• Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism [61.01709143437043]
  We introduce a novel agent design framework centered on a Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism (HTAM)<n>Specifically, HTAM moves beyond emulating social roles, instead structuring multi-agent systems into a logical hierarchy that mirrors the intrinsic task-dependency graph of a given domain.<n>We instantiate this framework as EarthAgent, a multi-agent system tailored for complex geospatial analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T12:25:47Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [109.53237992384872]
  Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z)
• Distinguishing Autonomous AI Agents from Collaborative Agentic Systems: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Modern Intelligent Architectures [0.0]
  The emergence of large language models has catalyzed two distinct yet interconnected paradigms in artificial intelligence: standalone AI Agents and collaborative Agentic AI ecosystems.<n>This study establishes a definitive framework for distinguishing these architectures through systematic analysis of their operational principles, structural compositions, and deployment methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T08:52:23Z)
• AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges [3.7414278978078204]
  This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T16:21:33Z)
• From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review [1.4929298667651645]
  We present a comparison of benchmarks developed between 2019 and 2025 that evaluate large language models and autonomous AI agents.<n>We propose a taxonomy of approximately 60 benchmarks that cover knowledge reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, code generation and software engineering, factual grounding and retrieval, domain-specific evaluations, multimodal and embodied tasks, task orchestration, and interactive assessments.<n>We present real-world applications of autonomous AI agents in materials science, biomedical research, academic ideation, software engineering, synthetic data generation, mathematical problem-solving, geographic information systems, multimedia, healthcare, and finance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T11:08:22Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.