CREATE: Testing LLMs for Associative Creativity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09970v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:58:44 GMT
• Title: CREATE: Testing LLMs for Associative Creativity
• Abstract summary: We introduce CREATE, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' capacity for creative associative reasoning.<n>We show that the strongest models achieve higher creative utility than others.<n>Our results illustrate that thinking models are not always more effective on our task, even with high token budgets.
• Score: 51.64544603712446
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A key component of creativity is associative reasoning: the ability to draw novel yet meaningful connections between concepts. We introduce CREATE, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' capacity for creative associative reasoning. CREATE requires models to generate sets of paths connecting concepts in a model's parametric knowledge. Paths should have high specificity (distinctiveness and closeness of the concept connection) and high diversity (dissimilarity from other paths), and models are scored more highly if they produce a larger set of strong, diverse paths. This task shares demands of real creativity tasks like hypothesis generation, including an extremely large search space, but enables collection of a sizable benchmark with objective answer grading. Evaluation of frontier models shows that the strongest models achieve higher creative utility than others, with the high multiplicity of answers and complexity of the search making benchmark saturation difficult to achieve. Furthermore, our results illustrate that thinking models are not always more effective on our task, even with high token budgets. Recent approaches for creative prompting give some but limited additional improvement. CREATE provides a sandbox for developing new methods to improve models' capacity for associative creativity.

Related papers

• CreativityBench: Evaluating Agent Creative Reasoning via Affordance-Based Tool Repurposing [67.2958108309687]
  CreativityBench is a benchmark for evaluating affordance-based creativity in LLMs.<n>We generate 14K grounded tasks that require identifying non-obvious yet physically plausible solutions under constraints.<n> Evaluations across 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, including closed and open-source models, show that models can often select a plausible object, but fail to identify the correct parts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T16:33:23Z)
• CresOWLve: Benchmarking Creative Problem-Solving Over Real-World Knowledge [19.526111468269892]
  We introduce CresOWLve, a benchmark for evaluating creative problem-solving using puzzles grounded in real-world knowledge.<n> Problems in CresOWLve require employing multiple creative thinking strategies, retrieving facts from diverse domains, and creatively combining them to arrive at a solution.<n>Our analysis reveals a consistent performance gap: models perform substantially better on factual questions than on creative ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T18:08:14Z)
• CreativeBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Machine Creativity via Self-Evolving Challenges [69.3795501613098]
  We introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation.<n>CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty.<n>We propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T12:36:56Z)
• Beyond Divergent Creativity: A Human-Based Evaluation of Creativity in Large Language Models [6.036586911740041]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in verbal creative tasks.<n>The widely used Divergent Association Task ( DAT) focuses on novelty, ignoring appropriateness.<n>We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art LLMs on DAT and show that their scores on the task are lower than those of two baselines that do not possess any creative abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T12:41:32Z)
• CreativityPrism: A Holistic Benchmark for Large Language Model Creativity [64.18257552903151]
  Creativity is often seen as a hallmark of human intelligence.<n>There is still no holistic framework to evaluate their creativity across diverse scenarios.<n>We propose CreativityPrism, an evaluation analysis framework that decomposes creativity into three dimensions: quality, novelty, and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T00:22:10Z)
• Generative Modeling with Multi-Instance Reward Learning for E-commerce Creative Optimization [15.51942931334223]
  In e-commerce advertising, selecting the most compelling combination of creative elements is critical for capturing user attention and driving conversions.<n>We propose a novel framework named GenCO that integrates generative modeling with multi-instance reward learning.<n>Our approach has significantly increased advertising revenue, demonstrating its practical value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T11:53:41Z)
• Cooking Up Creativity: Enhancing LLM Creativity through Structured Recombination [46.79423188943526]
  We introduce a novel approach that enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) creativity.<n>We apply LLMs for translating between natural language and structured representations, and perform the core creative leap.<n>We demonstrate our approach in the culinary domain with DishCOVER, a model that generates creative recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T11:13:06Z)
• Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
  Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity.<n>We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels.<n>To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z)
• A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models [100.16387798660833]
  Oogiri game is a creativity-driven task requiring humor and associative thinking.<n>LoTbench is an interactive, causality-aware evaluation framework.<n>Results show that while most LLMs exhibit constrained creativity, the performance gap between LLMs and humans is not insurmountable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T09:11:15Z)
• Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation [39.546827184857754]
  In this work, we introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity.<n>We define NEOGAUGE, a metric that quantifies both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative responses.<n>We test the proposed framework on Codeforces problems, which serve as both a natural dataset for coding tasks and a collection of prior human solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T05:55:22Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation [19.62178304006683]
  We argue that current interaction paradigms fall short, guiding users towards rapid convergence on a limited set of ideas. We propose a framework that facilitates the structured generation of design space in which users can seamlessly explore, evaluate, and synthesize a multitude of responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:53:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.