Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10069v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 04:07:39 GMT
• Title: Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code
• Abstract summary: Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools.<n>We propose textbfSearch textbfAgent textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfSAPO), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint.
• Score: 68.58667107354253
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools for a multi-turn information-seeking process autonomously. However, we identify a critical training instability that leads to catastrophic model collapse: Importance Sampling Distribution Drift(ISDD). In Group Relative Policy Optimization(GRPO), a widely adopted TARL algorithm, ISDD manifests as a precipitous decline in the importance sampling ratios, which nullifies gradient updates and triggers irreversible training failure. To address this, we propose \textbf{S}earch \textbf{A}gent \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization (\textbf{SAPO}), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint. Unlike hard clipping, which ignores distributional divergence, SAPO selectively penalizes the KL divergence between the current and old policies. Crucially, this penalty is applied only to positive tokens with low probabilities where the policy has shifted excessively, thereby preventing distribution drift while preserving gradient flow. Remarkably, SAPO requires only one-line code modification to standard GRPO, ensuring immediate deployability. Extensive experiments across seven QA benchmarks demonstrate that SAPO achieves \textbf{+10.6\% absolute improvement} (+31.5\% relative) over Search-R1, yielding consistent gains across varying model scales (1.5B, 14B) and families (Qwen, LLaMA).

Related papers

• Rethinking the Divergence Regularization in LLM RL [56.952725733148746]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key component of post-training large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Regularized Policy Optimization (DRPO), which replaces the hard mask with a smooth advantage-weighted quadratic regularizer on policy shift.<n>DRPO preserves the same trust-region geometry as DPPO while inducing bounded, continuous gradient weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T17:58:23Z)
• One-Way Policy Optimization for Self-Evolving LLMs [63.8638342097375]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose One-Way Policy Optimization (OWPO), a method based on the principle of decoupling optimization direction from update magnitude.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that OWPO outperforms strong baselines, including DAPO, OPD, and MOPD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T08:25:27Z)
• DGPO: Distribution Guided Policy Optimization for Fine Grained Credit Assignment [3.5885872325877926]
  We introduce Distribution Guided Policy Optimization, a novel critic free reinforcement learning framework.<n>We show that DGPO sets a new state-of-the-art for critic free alignment. Notably, DGPO achieves 60.0% Avg@32 accuracy and 46.4% Avg@32 accuracy on the challenging AIME2024 and AIME2025 benchmarks respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T03:36:27Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Language Models [27.22260417844743]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is highly effective for post-training autoregressive (AR) language models.<n>But its direct application to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) often triggers reward collapse.<n>We show these effects form a self-reinforcing instability loop that drives policy drift and further increases ratio variance.<n>We propose StableDRL, a reformulation of GRPO tailored for dLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T08:55:37Z)
• BandPO: Bridging Trust Regions and Ratio Clipping via Probability-Aware Bounds for LLM Reinforcement Learning [49.25750348525603]
  BandPO replaces canonical clipping with Band, a unified theoretical operator that projects trust regions into dynamic, probability-aware clipping intervals.<n>We show that BandPO consistently outperforms canonical clipping and Clip-Higher, while robustly mitigating entropy collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T08:03:05Z)
• Stable Asynchrony: Variance-Controlled Off-Policy RL for LLMs [19.079556051442168]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is widely used to improve large language models on reasoning tasks.<n>But for widely adopted critic-free policy-gradient methods such as REINFORCE and GRPO, high asynchrony makes the policy-gradient estimator markedly noisy.<n>We propose a stabilization method for REINFORCE/ GRPO-style algorithms that scales learning rate based on effective sample size to dampen unreliable updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:40:51Z)
• VESPO: Variational Sequence-Level Soft Policy Optimization for Stable Off-Policy LLM Training [18.849117699859622]
  Training stability is a central challenge in reinforcement learning for large language models.<n>We propose Variational sEquence-level Soft Policy Optimization (VESPO)<n> Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that VESPO maintains stable training under staleness ratios up to 64x and fully asynchronous execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T09:48:08Z)
• Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z)
• Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
  Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z)
• Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization [67.61886077470528]
  Reinforcement learning plays an increasingly important role in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>Existing group-based policy optimization methods, such as GSPO and GRPO, alleviate this problem via hard clipping.<n>We propose Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization (SAPO), which replaces hard clipping with a smooth, temperature-controlled gate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T14:25:19Z)
• Reinforce-Ada: An Adaptive Sampling Framework for Reinforce-Style LLM Training [47.26632817047513]
  Reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLMs) for reasoning tasks is often bottlenecked by unstable gradient estimates.<n>We propose Reinforce-Ada, an adaptive sampling framework for online RL post-training of LLMs.<n>Unlike conventional two-stage allocation methods, Reinforce-Ada interleaves estimation and sampling in an online successive elimination process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:34:09Z)
• Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints [26.274786600234876]
  The increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) raise opportunities for artificial general intelligence but amplify safety concerns. RLHF has emerged as a promising pathway towards AI alignment but brings forth challenges due to its complexity and dependence on a separate reward model. DPO has been proposed as an alternative, and it remains equivalent to RLHF under the reverse KL regularization constraint. We show that under certain $f$-divergences, including Jensen-Shannon divergence, forward KL divergences and $alpha$-divergences, the complex relationship between the reward and optimal policy can also be simplified
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T08:29:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.