Breaking User-Centric Agency: A Tri-Party Framework for Agent-Based Recommendation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10673v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:40:13 GMT
- Title: Breaking User-Centric Agency: A Tri-Party Framework for Agent-Based Recommendation
- Abstract summary: We propose the first Tri-party LLM-agent Recommendation framework (TriRec)<n>TriRec explicitly coordinates user utility, item exposure, and platform-level fairness.<n>We show consistent gains in accuracy, fairness, and item-level utility.
- Score: 59.362016745945375
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have stimulated growing interest in agent-based recommender systems, enabling language-driven interaction and reasoning for more expressive preference modeling. However, most existing agentic approaches remain predominantly user-centric, treating items as passive entities and neglecting the interests of other critical stakeholders. This limitation exacerbates exposure concentration and long-tail under-representation, threatening long-term system sustainability. In this work, we identify this fundamental limitation and propose the first Tri-party LLM-agent Recommendation framework (TriRec) that explicitly coordinates user utility, item exposure, and platform-level fairness. The framework employs a two-stage architecture: Stage~1 empowers item agents with personalized self-promotion to improve matching quality and alleviate cold-start barriers, while Stage~2 uses a platform agent for sequential multi-objective re-ranking, balancing user relevance, item utility, and exposure fairness. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show consistent gains in accuracy, fairness, and item-level utility. Moreover, we find that item self-promotion can simultaneously enhance fairness and effectiveness, challenging the conventional trade-off assumption between relevance and fairness. Our code is available at https://github.com/Marfekey/TriRec.
Related papers
- From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z) - Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking [10.224056739324702]
Sales lead conversion differs fundamentally from e-commerce recommendation due to prolonged decision cycles and multi-stage funnels.<n>Traditional lead scoring methods face severe challenges: sparse supervision, a semantic gap in unstructured CRM logs, and inability to capture relative lead priority.<n>We introduce an LLM-based discriminative framework for sales lead scoring, which supports joint modeling of structured CRM features and unstructured customer interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T03:05:57Z) - Joint Optimization of Relevance and Engagement in Multi-Task Ranking for E-Commerce with Efficient LLM Supervision [2.510555578533785]
We present a production-scale multi-task ranking system that integrates semantic relevance as a primary optimization objective.<n>Our architecture employs an ordinal relevance head that predicts cumulative probabilities over relevance thresholds.<n>Our approach significantly improves semantic alignment while preserving core engagement objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T21:26:17Z) - CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling [61.75914342638658]
CDRRM (Contrast-Driven Reward Model) is a framework for high-quality rubric generation and guided preference judgment.<n>This work offers a scalable, interpretable, and data-efficient path for reward modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T07:15:23Z) - Efficient Personalized Reranking with Semi-Autoregressive Generation and Online Knowledge Distillation [67.09494009022471]
We propose a novel Personalized Semi-Autoregressive with online knowledge Distillation (PSAD) framework for reranking.<n>In this framework, the teacher model adopts a semi-autoregressive generator to balance generation quality and efficiency, while its ranking knowledge is distilled online into a lightweight scoring network.<n>Experiments conducted on three large-scale public datasets demonstrate that PSAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both ranking performance and inference efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T08:37:13Z) - ChatShopBuddy: Towards Reliable Conversational Shopping Agents via Reinforcement Learning [88.87305027895657]
This work investigates Reinforcement Learning-based optimization for shopping agents in real-world scenarios.<n>Agents must simultaneously satisfy multiple interdependent objectives spanning objective metrics (product correctness), subjective qualities (persuasiveness), outcome rewards (final response quality), and process rewards (tool efficiency)<n>Experiments demonstrate that our RL-trained agent, ChatShopBuddy, consistently outperforms larger models relying on generic reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-06T09:18:51Z) - Revisiting Fairness-aware Interactive Recommendation: Item Lifecycle as a Control Knob [11.023574014254663]
This paper revisits fairness-aware interactive recommendation by introducing a novel control knob, i.e., the lifecycle of items.<n>We introduce LHRL, a lifecycle-aware hierarchical reinforcement learning framework.<n>Experiments on multiple real-world interactive recommendation demonstrate that LHRL significantly improves both fairness and user engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T11:27:04Z) - AgentDR Dynamic Recommendation with Implicit Item-Item Relations via LLM-based Agents [42.177723613925146]
We propose a novel LLM-agent framework, AgenDR, which bridges LLM reasoning with scalable recommendation tools.<n>Our approach delegates full-ranking tasks to traditional models while utilizing LLMs to integrate multiple recommendation outputs.<n>We show that our framework achieves superior full-ranking performance, yielding on average a twofold improvement over its underlying tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T05:48:05Z) - STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z) - Multimodal Fusion And Sparse Attention-based Alignment Model for Long Sequential Recommendation [9.086257183699418]
multimodal item sequences and mining multi-grained user interests can bridge the gap between content comprehension and recommendation.<n>We propose MUFASA, a MUltimodal Fusion And Sparse Attention-based Alignment model for long sequential recommendation.<n>Experiments on real-world benchmarks show that MUFASA consistently surpasses state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T09:50:44Z) - Multi-agents based User Values Mining for Recommendation [52.26100802380767]
We propose a zero-shot multi-LLM collaborative framework for effective and accurate user value extraction.<n>We apply text summarization techniques to condense item content while preserving essential meaning.<n>To mitigate hallucinations, we introduce two specialized agent roles: evaluators and supervisors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-02T04:01:31Z) - Concept Matching with Agent for Out-of-Distribution Detection [19.407364109506904]
We propose a new method that integrates the agent paradigm into out-of-distribution (OOD) detection task.<n>Our proposed method, Concept Matching with Agent (CMA), employs neutral prompts as agents to augment the CLIP-based OOD detection process.<n>Our extensive experimental results showcase the superior performance of CMA over both zero-shot and training-required methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T02:27:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.