Bridging Behavioral Biometrics and Source Code Stylometry: A Survey of Programmer Attribution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11150v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:45:06 GMT
• Title: Bridging Behavioral Biometrics and Source Code Stylometry: A Survey of Programmer Attribution
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a systematic mapping study of programmer attribution research focused on source code analysis.<n>From an initial set of 135 candidate publications, 47 studies published between 2012 and 2025 were selected through a structured screening process.<n>We derive a taxonomy that relates stylistic and behavioural feature types to commonly used machine learning techniques.
• Score: 2.5960593866103014
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Programmer attribution seeks to identify or verify the author of a source code artifact using stylistic, structural, or behavioural characteristics. This problem has been studied across software engineering, security, and digital forensics, resulting in a growing and methodologically diverse set of publications. This paper presents a systematic mapping study of programmer attribution research focused on source code analysis. From an initial set of 135 candidate publications, 47 studies published between 2012 and 2025 were selected through a structured screening process. The included works are analysed along several dimensions, including authorship tasks, feature categories, learning and modelling approaches, dataset sources, and evaluation practices. Based on this analysis, we derive a taxonomy that relates stylistic and behavioural feature types to commonly used machine learning techniques and provide a descriptive overview of publication trends, benchmarks, programming languages. A content-level analysis highlights the main thematic clusters in the field. The results indicate a strong focus on closed-world authorship attribution using stylometric features and a heavy reliance on a small number of benchmark datasets, while behavioural signals, authorship verification, and reproducibility remain less explored. The study consolidates existing research into a unified framework and outlines methodological gaps that can guide future work. This manuscript is currently under review. The present version is a preprint.

Related papers

• SotA Lens: A Network-Augmented Methodology and Tool for Exploratory State-of-the-Art Reviews [0.0]
  SotA Lens is a network-augmented methodology and lightweight software toolkit for exploratory State-of-the-Art reviews.<n>It is designed to complement, not replace, established review protocols such as PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR, systematic mapping studies, and bibliometric science mapping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T19:44:35Z)
• Large-Scale Multidimensional Knowledge Profiling of Scientific Literature [46.15403461273178]
  We compile a unified corpus of more than 100,000 papers from 22 major conferences between 2020 and 2025.<n>Our analysis highlights several notable shifts, including the growth of safety, multimodal reasoning, and agent-oriented studies.<n>These findings provide an evidence-based view of how AI research is evolving and offer a resource for understanding broader trends and identifying emerging directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T16:47:05Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review on Detecting Software Vulnerabilities with Large Language Models [2.518519330408713]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in software engineering have sparked interest in their use for software vulnerability detection.<n>The rapid development of this field has resulted in a fragmented research landscape.<n>This fragmentation makes it difficult to obtain a clear overview of the state-of-the-art or compare and categorize studies meaningfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T13:17:16Z)
• Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
  Onologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data.<n> logical reasoning that can directly support are quite limited in learning, approximation and prediction.<n>One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z)
• From Pixels to Insights: A Survey on Automatic Chart Understanding in the Era of Large Foundation Models [98.41645229835493]
  Data visualization in the form of charts plays a pivotal role in data analysis, offering critical insights and aiding in informed decision-making.<n>Large foundation models, such as large language models, have revolutionized various natural language processing tasks.<n>This survey paper serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners in the fields of natural language processing, computer vision, and data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:57:09Z)
• A Taxonomy and Archetypes of Business Analytics in Smart Manufacturing [0.0]
  Business analytics is a key driver for smart manufacturing. However, researchers and practitioners struggle to keep track of the progress and acquire new knowledge within the field. We develop a quadripartite taxonomy as well as to derive archetypes of business analytics in smart manufacturing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T16:13:45Z)
• Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
  Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z)
• A Survey of Embedding Space Alignment Methods for Language and Knowledge Graphs [77.34726150561087]
  We survey the current research landscape on word, sentence and knowledge graph embedding algorithms. We provide a classification of the relevant alignment techniques and discuss benchmark datasets used in this field of research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T16:08:13Z)
• Topic Space Trajectories: A case study on machine learning literature [0.0]
  We present topic space trajectories, a structure that allows for the comprehensible tracking of research topics. We show the applicability of our approach on a publication corpus spanning 50 years of machine learning research from 32 publication venues. Our novel analysis method may be employed for paper classification, for the prediction of future research topics, and for the recommendation of fitting conferences and journals for submitting unpublished work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T10:53:42Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.