Synthesis-in-the-Loop Evaluation of LLMs for RTL Generation: Quality, Reliability, and Failure Modes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11287v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:26:58 GMT
- Title: Synthesis-in-the-Loop Evaluation of LLMs for RTL Generation: Quality, Reliability, and Failure Modes
- Abstract summary: We evaluate 32 language models on 202 Verilog tasks from VerilogEval and RTLLM.<n>13 frontier models achieve Global HQI above 71, led by Gemini-3-Pro.<n>A tool-adjudicated taxonomy of 195 genuine synthesis failures reveals systematic divergence.
- Score: 17.628790209793415
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: RTL generation demands more than software code synthesis: designs must be syntactically valid, synthesizable, functionally correct, and hardware-efficient. Existing evaluations stop at functional correctness, leaving synthesizability and implementation quality unmeasured. We evaluate 32 language models on 202 Verilog tasks from VerilogEval and RTLLM, with five attempts each, scoring via the Hardware Quality Index (HQI), a 0--100 metric integrating post-synthesis area, delay, and warning count relative to expert references under a Nangate45 45\,nm flow. Three performance tiers emerge: 13 frontier models achieve Global HQI above 71, led by Gemini-3-Pro (87.5\% coverage, 85.1 HQI); 11 mid-tier models cluster at 53--68; 8 fall below 53. The capability-to-deployment gap (best-of-five vs.\ single-attempt) spans 3.8--22.1 HQI points, motivating multi-sample strategies. A tool-adjudicated taxonomy of 195 genuine synthesis failures reveals systematic divergence: proprietary models fail late through elaboration errors and synthesis timeout; open-weight models fail early through missing module wrappers and non-synthesizable constructs, consistent with training on simulation-grade rather than synthesis-grade RTL. Rankings hold across three technology libraries at Spearman~$ρ> 0.99$.
Related papers
- Benchmarking LLMs for Verilog Design Flows [6.24010225101442]
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in code generation, but their capabilities to produce correct, synthesizable hardware description language (HDL) code still remain to be properly benchmarked.<n>This paper presents a reproducible benchmarking platform that evaluates open-source LLMs on Verilog RTL generation.<n>The pipeline improved syntax validity from 0% to a 70.43% average and simulation pass rate to 51.8% across three open-source models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-23T21:00:38Z) - How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design? [56.361436215029045]
We introduce a new error taxonomy grounded in problem solvability, inspired by cognitive theory.<n>Our taxonomy categorizes failures into syntactic, semantic, solvable functional, and unsolvable functional types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-26T14:34:49Z) - From Brute Force to Semantic Insight: Performance-Guided Data Transformation Design with LLMs [48.83701310501069]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved notable performance in code synthesis.<n>We introduce a performance-aware, closed-loop solution that enables LLMs to autonomously engineer optimal transformations.<n>We fine-tune LLMs with Low-Rank Adaptation on a novel repository of more than 6,000 empirically evaluated PyTorch augmentation functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T11:13:02Z) - From Memorization to Creativity: LLM as a Designer of Novel Neural-Architectures [48.83701310501069]
Large language models (LLMs) excel in program synthesis, yet their ability to autonomously navigate neural architecture design-balancing reliability, performance, and structural novelty--remains underexplored.<n>We address this by placing a code-oriented LLM within a closed-loop synthesis framework, analyzing its evolution over 22 supervised fine-tuning cycles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T13:20:28Z) - Close the Loop: Synthesizing Infinite Tool-Use Data via Multi-Agent Role-Playing [16.839489120513505]
InfTool orchestrates three collaborative agents to generate diverse, verified trajectories spanning single-turn calls to complex multi-step gated calls.<n>We show that InfTool transforms a base 32B model from 19.8% to 70.9% accuracy (+258%), surpassing models 10x larger and rivaling Claude-Opus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T17:12:39Z) - Teaching Language Models to Reason with Tools [73.21700643314917]
We present emphHint-Engineering, a new data synthesis strategy that strategically injects diverse hints at optimal points within reasoning paths.<n>CoRT significantly enhances efficiency, reducing token usage by approximately 30% for the 32B model and 50% for the 1.5B model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T08:41:44Z) - Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correction [95.91743732150233]
Goedel-Prover-V2, a series of open-source language models, set a new state-of-the-art in automated theorem proving.<n>We generate synthetic tasks of increasing difficulty to train the model to master increasingly complex theorems.<n>Goedel-Prover-V2-32B achieves 88.1% on MiniF2F at pass@32 in standard mode and 90.4% in self-correction mode.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T16:28:22Z) - CodeARC: Benchmarking Reasoning Capabilities of LLM Agents for Inductive Program Synthesis [6.8081984950459]
Existing evaluation protocols rely on static sets of examples and held-out tests, offering no feedback when synthesized functions are incorrect.<n>We propose CodeARC, a new evaluation framework where agents interact with a hidden target function by querying it with new inputs.<n>We construct the first large-scale benchmark for general-purpose inductive program synthesis, featuring 1114 functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T16:50:39Z) - Fully Autonomous Programming using Iterative Multi-Agent Debugging with Large Language Models [8.70160958177614]
Program synthesis with Large Language Models (LLMs) suffers from a "near-miss syndrome"<n>We address this with a multi-agent framework called Synthesize, Execute, Instruct, Debug, and Repair (SEIDR)<n>We empirically explore these trade-offs by comparing replace-focused, repair-focused, and hybrid debug strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T16:56:51Z) - START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools [51.38785489790888]
We introduce START (Self-Taught Reasoner with Tools), a tool-integrated long Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning LLM.<n> START is capable of performing complex computations, self-checking, exploring diverse methods, and self-ging.<n>It significantly outperforms the base QwQ-32B and achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art open-weight model R1-Distill-Qwen-32B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T17:11:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.