Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11619v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:24:05 GMT
• Title: Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats
• Abstract summary: We present a comprehensive security threat analysis of OpenClaw.<n>We examine threats across the agent's operational lifecycle, including indirect prompt injection, skill supply chain contamination, memory poisoning, and intent drift.<n>Our findings reveal critical weaknesses in current point-based defense mechanisms when addressing cross-temporal and multi-stage systemic risks.
• Score: 29.43070870263607
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, exemplified by OpenClaw, demonstrate remarkable capabilities in executing complex, long-horizon tasks. However, their tightly coupled instant-messaging interaction paradigm and high-privilege execution capabilities substantially expand the system attack surface. In this paper, we present a comprehensive security threat analysis of OpenClaw. To structure our analysis, we introduce a five-layer lifecycle-oriented security framework that captures key stages of agent operation, i.e., initialization, input, inference, decision, and execution, and systematically examine compound threats across the agent's operational lifecycle, including indirect prompt injection, skill supply chain contamination, memory poisoning, and intent drift. Through detailed case studies on OpenClaw, we demonstrate the prevalence and severity of these threats and analyze the limitations of existing defenses. Our findings reveal critical weaknesses in current point-based defense mechanisms when addressing cross-temporal and multi-stage systemic risks, highlighting the need for holistic security architectures for autonomous LLM agents. Within this framework, we further examine representative defense strategies at each lifecycle stage, including plugin vetting frameworks, context-aware instruction filtering, memory integrity validation protocols, intent verification mechanisms, and capability enforcement architectures.

Related papers

• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasures [36.008815600759156]
  OpenClaw is a new class of open-source agent frameworks that operate as continuously running, skill-augmented systems with persistent memory, multi-channel interaction, and high degrees of autonomy.<n>In particular, the combination of high-privilege operations and persistent memory exposes OpenClaw agents to various emerging threats, including skill poisoning, cognitive manipulation, multi-agent cascading failures, and supply-chain vulnerabilities.<n>We categorize existing security and privacy threats into a layered framework and analyze how vulnerabilities arise during agent reasoning, action execution, and external interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T05:25:39Z)
• ClawKeeper: Comprehensive Safety Protection for OpenClaw Agents Through Skills, Plugins, and Watchers [32.10899571321103]
  We present ClawKeeper, a real-time security framework that integrates multi-dimensional protection mechanisms across three complementary architectural layers.<n>We argue that this Watcher paradigm holds strong potential to serve as a foundational building block for securing next-generation autonomous agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T15:27:54Z)
• Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw [42.9467373594646]
  This report presents a comprehensive security analysis of the OpenClaw ecosystem.<n>We highlight critical vulnerabilities such as prompt injection-driven Remote Code Execution (RCE), sequential tool attack chains, context amnesia, and supply chain contamination.<n>To address these systemic architectural flaws, we introduce the Full-Lifecycle Agent Security Architecture (FASA)<n>This theoretical defense blueprint advocates for zero-trust agentic execution, dynamic intent verification, and cross-layer reasoning-action correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T04:33:05Z)
• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• Just Ask: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs [65.6660735371212]
  We present textbftextscJustAsk, a framework that autonomously discovers effective extraction strategies through interaction alone.<n>It formulates extraction as an online exploration problem, using Upper Confidence Bound--based strategy selection and a hierarchical skill space spanning atomic probes and high-level orchestration.<n>Our results expose system prompts as a critical yet largely unprotected attack surface in modern agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T03:53:25Z)
• Securing AI Agents in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey of Environmental Interactions, Deepfake Threats, and Defenses [2.6726842616701703]
  This survey provides a comprehensive review of security threats targeting AI agents in cyber-physical systems.<n>We focus on environmental interactions, deepfake-driven attacks, and MCP-mediated vulnerabilities.<n>We quantitatively illustrate how timing, noise, and false-positive costs constrainable defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T02:33:24Z)
• RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic [56.38397499463889]
  Embodied agents powered by vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly capable of executing complex real-world tasks.<n>However, they remain vulnerable to hazardous instructions that may trigger unsafe behaviors.<n>We propose RoboSafe, a runtime safeguard for embodied agents through executable predicate-based safety logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T15:01:26Z)
• Systematization of Knowledge: Security and Safety in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystem [0.0]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as the de facto standard for connecting Large Language Models to external data and tools.<n>This paper provides a taxonomy of risks in the MCP ecosystem, distinguishing between adversarial security threats and safety hazards.<n>We demonstrate how "context" can be weaponized to trigger unauthorized operations in multi-agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:39:21Z)
• Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA): A Lifecycle Supervision Framework for Robustly Aligned AI Agents [1.014002853673217]
  LLM agents are vulnerable to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) attacks.<n>IPI attacks hijack agent behavior by polluting external information sources.<n>We propose the Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA), a holistic framework achieving full-lifecycle cognitive supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T08:11:19Z)
• How Brittle is Agent Safety? Rethinking Agent Risk under Intent Concealment and Task Complexity [55.441602598245744]
  Current safety evaluations for LLM-driven agents primarily focus on atomic harms, failing to address sophisticated threats where malicious intent is concealed or diluted within complex tasks.<n>We address this gap with a two-dimensional analysis of agent safety brittleness under the pressures of intent concealment and task complexity.<n>Our findings reveal two critical phenomena: safety alignment degrades sharply and predictably as intent becomes obscured, and a "Complexity Paradox" emerges, where agents seem safer on harder tasks only due to capability limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T17:27:27Z)
• NeuroBreak: Unveil Internal Jailbreak Mechanisms in Large Language Models [68.09675063543402]
  NeuroBreak is a top-down jailbreak analysis system designed to analyze neuron-level safety mechanisms and mitigate vulnerabilities.<n>By incorporating layer-wise representation probing analysis, NeuroBreak offers a novel perspective on the model's decision-making process.<n>We conduct quantitative evaluations and case studies to verify the effectiveness of our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T08:12:06Z)
• Advancing Autonomous Incident Response: Leveraging LLMs and Cyber Threat Intelligence [3.2284427438223013]
  Security teams are overwhelmed by alert fatigue, high false-positive rates, and the vast volume of unstructured Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) documents.<n>We introduce a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate and enhance IR.<n>Our approach introduces a hybrid retrieval mechanism that combines NLP-based similarity searches within a CTI vector database with standardized queries to external CTI platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T14:20:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.