Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11736v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:42:56 GMT
• Title: Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes
• Abstract summary: This paper analyses how a state-of-the-art generative model (GPT-5) suggests occupations based on gender and work experience background, focusing on under-35-year-old Italian graduates.<n>The model has been prompted to suggest jobs to 24 simulated candidate profiles, which are balanced in terms of gender, age, experience and professional field.<n>Gendered linguistic patterns emerged in the adjectives attributed to female and male candidates, indicating a tendency of the model to associate women with emotional and empathetic traits.
• Score: 1.6566053195631467
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems have assumed increasingly crucial roles in selection processes, personnel recruitment and analysis of candidates' profiles. However, the employment of large language models (LLMs) risks reproducing, and in some cases amplifying, gender stereotypes and bias already present in the labour market. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and measure this phenomenon, analysing how a state-of-the-art generative model (GPT-5) suggests occupations based on gender and work experience background, focusing on under-35-year-old Italian graduates. The model has been prompted to suggest jobs to 24 simulated candidate profiles, which are balanced in terms of gender, age, experience and professional field. Although no significant differences emerged in job titles and industry, gendered linguistic patterns emerged in the adjectives attributed to female and male candidates, indicating a tendency of the model to associate women with emotional and empathetic traits, while men with strategic and analytical ones. The research raises an ethical question regarding the use of these models in sensitive processes, highlighting the need for transparency and fairness in future digital labour markets.

Related papers

• Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanations [2.86989372262348]
  Language models have been shown to propagate social bias through their output, particularly in the representation of gender and ethnicity.<n>This paper investigates gender and ethnicity biases in AI-generated occupational stories.<n>Our proposed mitigation strategy, Bias Analysis and Mitigation through Explanation (BAME), reveals improvements in demographic representation ranging from 2% to 20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T00:25:25Z)
• Who Gets the Callback? Generative AI and Gender Bias [0.030693357740321777]
  We find that large language models (LLMs) tend to favor men, especially for higher-wage roles.<n>A comprehensive analysis of linguistic features in job ads reveals strong alignment of model recommendations with traditional gender stereotypes.<n>Our findings highlight how AI-driven hiring may perpetuate biases in the labor market and have implications for fairness and diversity within firms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T07:55:52Z)
• Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models [0.8636148452563583]
  The study examines the extent to which Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit gender bias in pronoun selection in occupational contexts. The jobs considered include a range of occupations, from those with a significant male presence to those with a notable female concentration. The results show a positive correlation between the models' pronoun choices and the gender distribution present in U.S. labor force data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T22:23:13Z)
• Revealing and Reducing Gender Biases in Vision and Language Assistants (VLAs) [82.57490175399693]
  We study gender bias in 22 popular image-to-text vision-language assistants (VLAs)<n>Our results show that VLAs replicate human biases likely present in the data, such as real-world occupational imbalances.<n>To eliminate the gender bias in these models, we find that fine-tuning-based debiasing methods achieve the best trade-off between debiasing and retaining performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T05:59:44Z)
• Bias in Text Embedding Models [0.0]
  This paper examines the degree to which a selection of popular text embedding models are biased, particularly along gendered dimensions. The analysis reveals that text embedding models are prone to gendered biases but in varying ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T22:58:36Z)
• Generalizing Fairness to Generative Language Models via Reformulation of Non-discrimination Criteria [4.738231680800414]
  This paper studies how to uncover and quantify the presence of gender biases in generative language models. We derive generative AI analogues of three well-known non-discrimination criteria from classification, namely independence, separation and sufficiency. Our results address the presence of occupational gender bias within such conversational language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T14:19:08Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)
• Are Commercial Face Detection Models as Biased as Academic Models? [64.71318433419636]
  We compare academic and commercial face detection systems, specifically examining robustness to noise. We find that state-of-the-art academic face detection models exhibit demographic disparities in their noise robustness. We conclude that commercial models are always as biased or more biased than an academic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T02:21:42Z)
• How True is GPT-2? An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases [50.591267188664666]
  Downstream applications are at risk of inheriting biases contained in natural language models. We analyze the occupational biases of a popular generative language model, GPT-2. For a given job, GPT-2 reflects the societal skew of gender and ethnicity in the US, and in some cases, pulls the distribution towards gender parity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T11:10:27Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.