Language Generation with Replay: A Learning-Theoretic View of Model Collapse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11784v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:44:17 GMT
• Title: Language Generation with Replay: A Learning-Theoretic View of Model Collapse
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of model collapse in generative models through the theoretical lens of language generation in the limit framework.<n>Our main contribution is a fine-grained learning-theoretic characterization of when replay fundamentally limits generation.
• Score: 27.157142191029024
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As scaling laws push the training of frontier large language models (LLMs) toward ever-growing data requirements, training pipelines are approaching a regime where much of the publicly available online text may be consumed. At the same time, widespread LLM usage increases the volume of machine-generated content on the web; together, these trends raise the likelihood of generated text re-entering future training corpora, increasing the associated risk of performance degradation often called model collapse. In practice, model developers address this concern through data cleaning, watermarking, synthetic-data policies, or, in some cases, blissful ignorance. However, the problem of model collapse in generative models has not been examined from a learning-theoretic perspective: we study it through the theoretical lens of the language generation in the limit framework, introducing a replay adversary that augments the example stream with the generator's own past outputs. Our main contribution is a fine-grained learning-theoretic characterization of when replay fundamentally limits generation: while replay is benign for the strongest notion of uniform generation, it provably creates separations for the weaker notions of non-uniform generation and generation in the limit. Interestingly, our positive results mirror heuristics widely used in practice, such as data cleaning, watermarking, and output filtering, while our separations show when these ideas can fail.

Related papers

• RAVEN: Real-time Autoregressive Video Extrapolation with Consistency-model GRPO [53.38929612273108]
  Causal autoregressive video diffusion models support real-time streaming generation by extrapolating future chunks from previously generated content.<n>We introduce the Real-time Autoregressive Video Extrapolation Network (RAVEN), a training-time test framework that repacks each self rollout into an interleaved sequence of clean historical endpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T17:59:30Z)
• Boosting Alignment for Post-Unlearning Text-to-Image Generative Models [55.82190434534429]
  Large-scale generative models have shown impressive image-generation capabilities, propelled by massive data.<n>This often inadvertently leads to the generation of harmful or inappropriate content and raises copyright concerns.<n>We propose a framework that seeks an optimal model update at each unlearning iteration, ensuring monotonic improvement on both objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T21:36:10Z)
• Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning [63.83608300361159]
  We study the learning dynamics of generative models that are fed back their own produced content in addition to their original training dataset. We show that, unless a sufficient amount of external data is introduced at each iteration, any non-trivial temperature leads the model to degenerate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T21:51:39Z)
• Continual Learning of Diffusion Models with Generative Distillation [34.52513912701778]
  Diffusion models are powerful generative models that achieve state-of-the-art performance in image synthesis. In this paper, we propose generative distillation, an approach that distils the entire reverse process of a diffusion model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T14:33:03Z)
• Learning to Jump: Thinning and Thickening Latent Counts for Generative Modeling [69.60713300418467]
  Learning to jump is a general recipe for generative modeling of various types of data. We demonstrate when learning to jump is expected to perform comparably to learning to denoise, and when it is expected to perform better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T05:38:28Z)
• The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget [70.02793975243212]
  Large language models (LLMs) are here to stay, and will bring about drastic change in the whole ecosystem of online text and images. We find that use of model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects in the resulting models, where tails of the original content distribution disappear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-27T15:10:41Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy [164.83371924650294]
  We show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call Iter-RetGen, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner. A model output shows what might be needed to finish a task, and thus provides an informative context for retrieving more relevant knowledge. Iter-RetGen processes all retrieved knowledge as a whole and largely preserves the flexibility in generation without structural constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:17:36Z)
• Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrations [17.549815256968877]
  Current approaches to text generation largely rely on autoregressive models and maximum likelihood estimation. We propose GOLD: an easy-to-optimize algorithm that learns from expert demonstrations by importance weighting. According to both automatic and human evaluation, models trained by GOLD outperform those trained by MLE and policy gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T17:58:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.