DatedGPT: Preventing Lookahead Bias in Large Language Models with Time-Aware Pretraining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11838v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:04:43 GMT
• Title: DatedGPT: Preventing Lookahead Bias in Large Language Models with Time-Aware Pretraining
• Abstract summary: We present DatedGPT, a family of twelve language models, each trained from scratch on approximately 100 billion tokens of temporally partitioned data.<n>Perplexity-based probing confirms that each model's knowledge is effectively bounded by its data cutoff year.<n>We provide an interactive web demo that allows users to query and compare responses from models across different cutoff years.
• Score: 11.689889880795514
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In financial backtesting, large language models pretrained on internet-scale data risk introducing lookahead bias that undermines their forecasting validity, as they may have already seen the true outcome during training. To address this, we present DatedGPT, a family of twelve 1.3B-parameter language models, each trained from scratch on approximately 100 billion tokens of temporally partitioned data with strict annual cutoffs spanning 2013 to 2024. We further enhance each model with instruction fine-tuning on both general-domain and finance-specific datasets curated to respect the same temporal boundaries. Perplexity-based probing confirms that each model's knowledge is effectively bounded by its data cutoff year, while evaluation on standard benchmarks shows competitive performance with existing models of similar scale. We provide an interactive web demo that allows users to query and compare responses from models across different cutoff years.

Related papers

• Foundation Models and Fine-Tuning: Toward a New Generation of Models for Time Series Forecasting [26.28141834580785]
  Foundation models have emerged as a promising paradigm for zero-shot time series forecasting.<n>They are pre-trained on vast and diverse collections of time series, learning generalizable representations that support both point and probabilistic forecasting.<n>This approach alleviates the need for dataset-specific model design and manual tuning, offering a unified solution across forecasting problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T10:55:06Z)
• Estimating Time Series Foundation Model Transferability via In-Context Learning [74.65355820906355]
  Time series foundation models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting via large-scale pre-training.<n>Fine-tuning remains critical for boosting performance in domains with limited public data.<n>We introduce TimeTic, a transferability estimation framework that recasts model selection as an in-context-learning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T07:07:13Z)
• Breaking Silos: Adaptive Model Fusion Unlocks Better Time Series Forecasting [64.45587649141842]
  Time-series forecasting plays a critical role in many real-world applications.<n>No single model consistently outperforms others across different test samples, but instead (ii) each model excels in specific cases.<n>We introduce TimeFuse, a framework for collective time-series forecasting with sample-level adaptive fusion of heterogeneous models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T00:45:07Z)
• GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluation [90.53485251837235]
  Time series foundation models excel in zero-shot forecasting, handling diverse tasks without explicit training. GIFT-Eval is a pioneering benchmark aimed at promoting evaluation across diverse datasets. GIFT-Eval encompasses 23 datasets over 144,000 time series and 177 million data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T11:29:38Z)
• MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models. We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z)
• Recency-Weighted Temporally-Segmented Ensemble for Time-Series Modeling [0.0]
  Time-series modeling in process industries faces the challenge of dealing with complex, multi-faceted, and evolving data characteristics. We introduce the Recency-Weighted Temporally-Segmented (ReWTS) ensemble model, a novel chunk-based approach for multi-step forecasting. We present a comparative analysis, utilizing two years of data from a wastewater treatment plant and a drinking water treatment plant in Norway.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T16:00:35Z)
• Unified Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting Benchmark [0.6526824510982802]
  We present a comprehensive dataset designed explicitly for long-term time-series forecasting. We incorporate a collection of datasets obtained from diverse, dynamic systems and real-life records. To determine the most effective model in diverse scenarios, we conduct an extensive benchmarking analysis using classical and state-of-the-art models. Our findings reveal intriguing performance comparisons among these models, highlighting the dataset-dependent nature of model effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T18:59:00Z)
• EAMDrift: An interpretable self retrain model for time series [0.0]
  We present EAMDrift, a novel method that combines forecasts from multiple individual predictors by weighting each prediction according to a performance metric. EAMDrift is designed to automatically adapt to out-of-distribution patterns in data and identify the most appropriate models to use at each moment. Our study on real-world datasets shows that EAMDrift outperforms individual baseline models by 20% and achieves comparable accuracy results to non-interpretable ensemble models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T13:25:26Z)
• Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of Open Information Extraction [49.15931834209624]
  We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world.<n>We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique.<n>By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Improving QA Generalization by Concurrent Modeling of Multiple Biases [61.597362592536896]
  Existing NLP datasets contain various biases that models can easily exploit to achieve high performances on the corresponding evaluation sets. We propose a general framework for improving the performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets by concurrent modeling of multiple biases in the training data. We extensively evaluate our framework on extractive question answering with training data from various domains with multiple biases of different strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T11:18:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.