Sparking Scientific Creativity via LLM-Driven Interdisciplinary Inspiration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12226v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:48:34 GMT
• Title: Sparking Scientific Creativity via LLM-Driven Interdisciplinary Inspiration
• Abstract summary: Idea-Catalyst is a novel framework that identifies interdisciplinary insights to support creative reasoning in both humans and large language models.<n>It embodies key metacognitive features of interdisciplinary reasoning: (a) defining and assessing research goals, (b) awareness of a domain's opportunities and unresolved challenges, and (c) strategic exploration of interdisciplinary ideas based on impact potential.
• Score: 21.009527937618248
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite interdisciplinary research leading to larger and longer-term impact, most work remains confined to single-domain academic silos. Recent AI-based approaches to scientific discovery show promise for interdisciplinary research, but many prioritize rapidly designing experiments and solutions, bypassing the exploratory, collaborative reasoning processes that drive creative interdisciplinary breakthroughs. As a result, prior efforts largely prioritize automating scientific discovery rather than augmenting the reasoning processes that underlie scientific disruption. We present Idea-Catalyst, a novel framework that systematically identifies interdisciplinary insights to support creative reasoning in both humans and large language models. Starting from an abstract research goal, Idea-Catalyst is designed to assist the brainstorming stage, explicitly avoiding premature anchoring on specific solutions. The framework embodies key metacognitive features of interdisciplinary reasoning: (a) defining and assessing research goals, (b) awareness of a domain's opportunities and unresolved challenges, and (c) strategic exploration of interdisciplinary ideas based on impact potential. Concretely, Idea-Catalyst decomposes an abstract goal (e.g., improving human-AI collaboration) into core target-domain research questions that guide the analysis of progress and open challenges within that domain. These challenges are reformulated as domain-agnostic conceptual problems, enabling retrieval from external disciplines (e.g., Psychology, Sociology) that address analogous issues. By synthesizing and recontextualizing insights from these domains back into the target domain, Idea-Catalyst ranks source domains by their interdisciplinary potential. Empirically, this targeted integration improves average novelty by 21% and insightfulness by 16%, while remaining grounded in the original research problem.

Related papers

• Personalized Auto-Research: Towards a True AI Co-Scientist [90.01790420664169]
  Given a research goal, state-of-the-art systems remain researcher-agnostic.<n>What counts as novel, valuable, or feasible depends on the researcher.<n>We propose a framework that threads a graph-grounded researcher context through retrieval, hypothesis search, experimentation, writing, and review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T20:43:27Z)
• SciAtlas: A Large-Scale Knowledge Graph for Automated Scientific Research [64.97707567378497]
  We introduce SciAtlas, a large-scale, multi-disciplinary, heterogeneous academic resource knowledge graph.<n>By integrating over 43M papers from 26 disciplines, and a total of 157M entities and 3B triplets, SciAtlas provides a structured topological cognitive substrate.<n>We develop a neuro-symbolic retrieval algorithm featuring tri-path collaborative recall and graph reranking, achieving a seamless transition from simple semantic matching to deterministic association discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T16:03:29Z)
• Intersectoral Knowledge in AI and Urban Studies: A Framework for Transdisciplinary Research [0.0]
  This article proposes a six-dimensional framework for assessing and strengthening transdisciplinary knowledge validity in AI and city studies.<n>Specifically, the framework classifies research according to ontological, orientations, methodological, positivological, axiological, and valorization dimensions.<n>Less common stances, such as idealism, mixed methods, and cultural valorization, are also examined for their potential to enrich knowledge production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T23:35:09Z)
• Understanding Large Language Models' Ability on Interdisciplinary Research [27.539601507270575]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools and collaborators in scientific discovery.<n>The lack of a dedicated benchmark that evaluates LLMs' ability to develop ideas in Interdisciplinary Research poses a critical barrier to fully understanding their strengths and limitations.<n>We introduce IDRBench -- a pioneering benchmark featuring an expert annotated dataset and a suite of tasks tailored to evaluate LLMs' capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T15:43:05Z)
• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• Towards deployment-centric multimodal AI beyond vision and language [69.58738352730103]
  We advocate a deployment-centric workflow that incorporates deployment constraints early to reduce the likelihood of undeployable solutions.<n>We identify common multimodal-AI-specific challenges shared across disciplines and examine three real-world use cases.<n>By fostering multidisciplinary dialogue and open research practices, our community can accelerate deployment-centric development for broad societal impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T17:20:05Z)
• The Blind Men and the Elephant: Mapping Interdisciplinarity in Research on Decentralized Autonomous Organizations [0.0]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are attracting interdisciplinary interest, particularly in business, economics, and computer science.<n>Research remains fragmented across disciplines, limiting a comprehensive understanding of their potential.<n>Current research remains predominantly applied and case-driven, with limited theoretical integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T07:06:43Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities.<n>Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• On Creativity and Open-Endedness [1.3398445165628465]
  The goal of this paper is to revitalize discussions of potential connections between the fields of Computational Creativity (CC) and Artificial Life (ALife) The primary goal of CC is to endow artificial systems with creativity, and ALife has dedicated much research effort into studying and synthesizing OE and artificial innovation. Despite the close proximity of these concepts, their use so far remains confined to their respective communities, and their relationship is largely unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:57:37Z)
• On the importance of AI research beyond disciplines [7.022779279820803]
  It is crucial to embrace interdisciplinary knowledge to understand the impact of technology on society. The goal is to foster a research environment beyond disciplines that values diversity and creates, critiques and develops new conceptual and theoretical frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T19:39:37Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.