DIALECTIC: A Multi-Agent System for Startup Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12274v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 11:40:36 GMT
• Title: DIALECTIC: A Multi-Agent System for Startup Evaluation
• Abstract summary: We introduce DIALECTIC, an LLM-based multi-agent system for startup evaluation.<n>It first gathers factual knowledge about a startup and organizes these facts into a hierarchical question tree.<n>It then synthesizes the facts into natural-language arguments for and against an investment and iteratively critiques and refines these arguments through a simulated debate.<n>Our system also produces numeric decision scores that allow investors to rank and thus efficiently prioritize opportunities.
• Score: 2.5358402189416704
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Venture capital (VC) investors face a large number of investment opportunities but only invest in few of these, with even fewer ending up successful. Early-stage screening of opportunities is often limited by investor bandwidth, demanding tradeoffs between evaluation diligence and number of opportunities assessed. To ease this tradeoff, we introduce DIALECTIC, an LLM-based multi-agent system for startup evaluation. DIALECTIC first gathers factual knowledge about a startup and organizes these facts into a hierarchical question tree. It then synthesizes the facts into natural-language arguments for and against an investment and iteratively critiques and refines these arguments through a simulated debate, which surfaces only the most convincing arguments. Our system also produces numeric decision scores that allow investors to rank and thus efficiently prioritize opportunities. We evaluate DIALECTIC through backtesting on real investment opportunities aggregated from five VC funds, showing that DIALECTIC matches the precision of human VCs in predicting startup success.

Related papers

• Your AI, On a Dial: Controlling Investment Bias in LLMs with a Single Neuron [76.4407829130164]
  We study whether a model's overall investment stance can be calibrated to a specified direction and strength.<n>We introduce an investment-bias dial, an inference-time intervention on a single neuron.<n>We find that the dial produces monotonic changes in investment stance without modifying prompts or model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T06:33:02Z)
• LLM Agents as VC investors: Predicting Startup Success via RolePlay-Based Collective Simulation [13.180519641845398]
  SimVC-CAS is a novel collective agent system that simulates venture capital decision-making as a multi-agent interaction process.<n>We show that SimVC-CAS significantly improves predictive accuracy while providing interpretable, multiperspective reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T14:34:44Z)
• Can Large Language Models Improve Venture Capital Exit Timing After IPO? [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in synthesizing complex financial data and textual information but have not been applied to post-IPO exit decisions.<n>This study introduces a framework that uses LLMs to estimate the optimal time for VC exit by analyzing monthly post IPO information financial performance, filings, news, and market signals.<n>We compare these LLM generated recommendations with the actual exit dates observed for VCs and compute the return differences between the two strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T00:19:34Z)
• CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency [60.83660377169452]
  This paper introduces CryptoBench, the first expert-curated, dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the real-world capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>Unlike general-purpose agent benchmarks for search and prediction, professional crypto analysis presents specific challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:52:34Z)
• Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [62.388554963415906]
  In finance, Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts arising from discrepancies between their pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>These conflicts are especially problematic in real-world investment services, where a model's inherent biases can misalign with institutional objectives.<n>We propose an experimental framework to investigate emergent behaviors in such conflict scenarios, offering a quantitative analysis of bias in investment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z)
• Policy Induction: Predicting Startup Success via Explainable Memory-Augmented In-Context Learning [0.0]
  We propose a transparent and data-efficient investment decision framework powered by memory-augmented large language models.<n>We introduce a lightweight training process that combines few-shot learning with an in-context learning loop.<n>Our system predicts startup success far more accurately than existing benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T16:57:07Z)
• Automating Venture Capital: Founder assessment using LLM-powered segmentation, feature engineering and automated labeling techniques [0.0]
  This study explores the application of large language models (LLMs) in venture capital (VC) decision-making. We utilize LLM prompting techniques, like chain-of-thought, to generate features from limited data, then extract insights through statistics and machine learning. Our results reveal potential relationships between certain founder characteristics and success, as well as demonstrate the effectiveness of these characteristics in prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T22:54:13Z)
• FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [75.09474986283394]
  FinBen is the first extensive open-source evaluation benchmark, including 36 datasets spanning 24 financial tasks. FinBen offers several key innovations: a broader range of tasks and datasets, the first evaluation of stock trading, novel agent and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) evaluation, and three novel open-source evaluation datasets for text summarization, question answering, and stock trading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T02:16:16Z)
• Empowering Many, Biasing a Few: Generalist Credit Scoring through Large Language Models [53.620827459684094]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential for credit scoring tasks, with strong generalization ability across multiple tasks. We propose the first open-source comprehensive framework for exploring LLMs for credit scoring. We then propose the first Credit and Risk Assessment Large Language Model (CALM) by instruction tuning, tailored to the nuanced demands of various financial risk assessment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T03:50:34Z)
• ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate [57.71597869337909]
  We build a multi-agent referee team called ChatEval to autonomously discuss and evaluate the quality of generated responses from different models. Our analysis shows that ChatEval transcends mere textual scoring, offering a human-mimicking evaluation process for reliable assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T15:13:04Z)
• Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models [48.87381259980254]
  We document the capability of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to predict stock market reactions from news headlines without direct financial training.<n>Using post-knowledge-cutoff headlines, GPT-4 captures initial market responses, achieving approximately 90% portfolio-day hit rates for the non-tradable initial reaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-15T19:22:37Z)
• Using Deep Learning to Find the Next Unicorn: A Practical Synthesis [42.70427723009158]
  Venture Capital (VC) strives to identify and invest in unicorn startups during their early stages, hoping to gain a high return. Over the past two decades, the industry has gone through a paradigm shift moving from conventional statistical approaches towards becoming machine-learning based. In this work, we carry out a literature review and synthesis on DL-based approaches, covering the entire DL life cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T13:11:16Z)
• A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying Investment Opportunities in Private Equity [0.0]
  This paper proposes a framework for automated data-driven screening of investment opportunities. The framework draws on data from several sources to assess the financial and managerial position of a company. It then uses an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) engine to suggest investment recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T21:28:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.