Optimize Wider, Not Deeper: Consensus Aggregation for Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12596v1
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 03:02:12 GMT
- Title: Optimize Wider, Not Deeper: Consensus Aggregation for Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: Proximal policy optimization approximates the trust region update using multiple epochs of clipped SGD.<n>We study aggregation in two spaces: Euclidean parameter space, and the natural parameter space of the policy distribution.<n>CAPO demonstrates that policy optimization can be improved by optimizing wider, rather than deeper, without additional environment interactions.
- Score: 8.093146587950573
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Proximal policy optimization (PPO) approximates the trust region update using multiple epochs of clipped SGD. Each epoch may drift further from the natural gradient direction, creating path-dependent noise. To understand this drift, we can use Fisher information geometry to decompose policy updates into signal (the natural gradient projection) and waste (the Fisher-orthogonal residual that consumes trust region budget without first-order surrogate improvement). Empirically, signal saturates but waste grows with additional epochs, creating an optimization-depth dilemma. We propose Consensus Aggregation for Policy Optimization (CAPO), which redirects compute from depth to width: $K$ PPO replicates are optimized on the same batch, differing only in minibatch shuffling order, and then aggregated into a consensus. We study aggregation in two spaces: Euclidean parameter space, and the natural parameter space of the policy distribution via the logarithmic opinion pool. In natural parameter space, the consensus provably achieves higher KL-penalized surrogate and tighter trust region compliance than the mean expert; parameter averaging inherits these guarantees approximately. On continuous control tasks, CAPO outperforms PPO and compute-matched deeper baselines under fixed sample budgets by up to 8.6x. CAPO demonstrates that policy optimization can be improved by optimizing wider, rather than deeper, without additional environment interactions.
Related papers
- Stochastic MeanFlow Policies: One-Step Generative Control with Entropic Mirror Descent [53.828537014796574]
Online off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) is shaped by two choices: the policy class and the update rule.<n>We propose MeanFlow Policies, a one-step generative policy class that maps noise to actions through a MeanFlow transformation.<n>Across seven MuJoCo benchmarks, S improves over Gaussian and generative baselines while retaining single-step inference efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T15:14:14Z) - Unbiased Dynamic Pruning for Efficient Group-Based Policy Optimization [60.87651283510059]
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) effectively scales LLM reasoning but incurs prohibitive computational costs.<n>We propose Dynamic Pruning Policy Optimization (DPPO), a framework that enables dynamic pruning while preserving unbiased gradient estimation.<n>To mitigate the data sparsity induced by pruning, we introduce Dense Prompt Packing, a window-based greedy strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-04T14:48:53Z) - Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z) - Sequential Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design in Infinite Dimensions via Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning [3.2580743227673694]
High-fidelity approaches require repeated forward and adjoint PDE solves inside nested Bayesian inversion and design loops.<n>We formulate SBOED as a finite-horizon Markov decision process and learn an amortized design policy via policy-gradient reinforcement learning.<n> Numerical experiments on sequential multi-sensor placement for contaminant source tracking demonstrate approximately $100times$ speedup over high-fidelity finite element methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T15:44:49Z) - Beyond the Boundaries of Proximal Policy Optimization [17.577317574595206]
This work offers an alternative perspective of PPO, in which it is decomposed into the inner-loop estimation of update vectors.
We propose outer proximal policy optimization (outer-PPO); a framework wherein these update vectors are applied using an arbitrary gradient-based gradient.
Methods are evaluated against an aggressively tuned PPO baseline on Brax, Jumanji and MinAtar environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T15:29:10Z) - Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment [93.39181634597877]
Direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data.
We show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice.
We propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T18:51:54Z) - Simple Policy Optimization [15.66748378216631]
Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) is known for ensuring monotonic policy improvement through conservative updates within a trust region.<n>Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) addresses this by simplifying TRPO's approach using ratio clipping, improving efficiency but sacrificing some theoretical robustness.<n>This raises a natural question: Can we combine the strengths of both methods?<n>In this paper, we introduce Simple Policy Optimization (SPO), a novel unconstrained first-order algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T10:17:54Z) - Last-Iterate Convergent Policy Gradient Primal-Dual Methods for
Constrained MDPs [107.28031292946774]
We study the problem of computing an optimal policy of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision process (constrained MDP)
We develop two single-time-scale policy-based primal-dual algorithms with non-asymptotic convergence of their policy iterates to an optimal constrained policy.
To the best of our knowledge, this work appears to be the first non-asymptotic policy last-iterate convergence result for single-time-scale algorithms in constrained MDPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T17:27:31Z) - Proximal Policy Optimization with Adaptive Threshold for Symmetric
Relative Density Ratio [8.071506311915396]
A popular method, so-called policy optimization (PPO), and its variants constrain density ratio of the latest and baseline policies when the density ratio exceeds a given threshold.
This paper proposes a new PPO derived using relative Pearson (RPE) divergence, therefore so-called PPO-RPE, to design the threshold adaptively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-18T09:13:13Z) - Optimistic Policy Optimization is Provably Efficient in Non-stationary MDPs [113.8752163061151]
We study episodic reinforcement learning (RL) in non-stationary linear kernel Markov decision processes (MDPs)<n>We propose the underlineperiodically underlinerestarted underlineoptimistic underlinepolicy underlineoptimization algorithm (PROPO)<n>PROPO features two mechanisms: sliding-window-based policy evaluation and periodic-restart-based policy improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T02:33:20Z) - Near Optimal Policy Optimization via REPS [33.992374484681704]
emphrelative entropy policy search (REPS) has demonstrated successful policy learning on a number of simulated and real-world robotic domains.
There exist no guarantees on REPS's performance when using gradient-based solvers.
We introduce a technique that uses emphgenerative access to the underlying decision process to compute parameter updates that maintain favorable convergence to the optimal regularized policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-17T16:22:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.