Mastering Negation: Boosting Grounding Models via Grouped Opposition-Based Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12606v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 03:21:48 GMT
• Title: Mastering Negation: Boosting Grounding Models via Grouped Opposition-Based Learning
• Abstract summary: We introduce D-Negation, a new dataset that provides objects annotated with both positive and negative semantic descriptions.<n>We propose a grouped opposition-based learning framework that learns negation-aware representations from limited samples.<n>By fine-tuning fewer than 10 percent of the model parameters, our approach achieves improvements of up to 4.4 mAP and 5.7 mAP on positive and negative semantic evaluations.
• Score: 87.15765427638195
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current vision-language detection and grounding models predominantly focus on prompts with positive semantics and often struggle to accurately interpret and ground complex expressions containing negative semantics. A key reason for this limitation is the lack of high-quality training data that explicitly captures discriminative negative samples and negation-aware language descriptions. To address this challenge, we introduce D-Negation, a new dataset that provides objects annotated with both positive and negative semantic descriptions. Building upon the observation that negation reasoning frequently appears in natural language, we further propose a grouped opposition-based learning framework that learns negation-aware representations from limited samples. Specifically, our method organizes opposing semantic descriptions from D-Negation into structured groups and formulates two complementary loss functions that encourage the model to reason about negation and semantic qualifiers. We integrate the proposed dataset and learning strategy into a state-of-the-art language-based grounding model. By fine-tuning fewer than 10 percent of the model parameters, our approach achieves improvements of up to 4.4 mAP and 5.7 mAP on positive and negative semantic evaluations, respectively. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling negation semantics can substantially enhance the robustness and localization accuracy of vision-language grounding models.

Related papers

• The Sound of Absence: Audio-Language Embedding Models Struggle with Negation [58.04745279785462]
  We show that embedding models fail to encode negated sound concepts.<n>We introduce NegEval-Audio, a framework that converts datasets into two negation-aware tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T02:55:00Z)
• NEGATE: Constrained Semantic Guidance for Linguistic Negation in Text-to-Video Diffusion [20.606497274927367]
  Negation is a fundamental linguistic operator, yet it remains inadequately modeled in diffusion-based generative systems.<n>We present a formal treatment of linguistic negation in diffusion-based generative models by modeling it as a structured feasibility constraint on semantic guidance.<n>Our method achieves robust negation compliance while preserving visual fidelity and structural coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T18:21:49Z)
• LANE: Lexical Adversarial Negative Examples for Word Sense Disambiguation [3.506940838682547]
  Fine-grained word meaning resolution remains a critical challenge for neural language models.<n>We propose a novel adversarial training strategy, called LANE, to address this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T12:37:20Z)
• Analyzing and Mitigating Negation Artifacts using Data Augmentation for Improving ELECTRA-Small Model Accuracy [0.0]
  We investigate the performance of an ELECTRA-small model fine-tuned on the Stanford Natural Language Inference dataset.<n>We identify that the model struggles with correctly classifying examples containing negation.<n>To address this, we augment the training data with contrast sets and adversarial examples emphasizing negation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T05:25:46Z)
• A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Negation for NLP and Neural Retrievers [57.57320129313161]
  We introduce a taxonomy of negation that derives from philosophical, linguistic, and logical definitions.<n>We generate two benchmark datasets that can be used to evaluate the performance of neural information retrieval models.<n>We propose a logic-based classification mechanism that can be used to analyze the performance of retrieval models on existing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T02:44:20Z)
• Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding [4.9301587184653295]
  Negation is a fundamental linguistic phenomenon that poses persistent challenges for Large Language Models.<n>Existing benchmarks often treat negation as a side case within broader tasks like natural language inference.<n>We introduce Thunder-NUBench, a novel benchmark explicitly designed to assess sentence-level negation understanding in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T10:51:39Z)
• Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation [50.27667000027403]
  NegBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate negation understanding across 18 task variations and $79$k examples.<n>We show that this approach can result in a 10% increase in recall on negated queries and a 28% boost in accuracy on multiple-choice questions with negated captions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T09:55:42Z)
• Improving negation detection with negation-focused pre-training [58.32362243122714]
  Negation is a common linguistic feature that is crucial in many language understanding tasks. Recent work has shown that state-of-the-art NLP models underperform on samples containing negation. We propose a new negation-focused pre-training strategy, involving targeted data augmentation and negation masking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T02:41:11Z)
• Understanding by Understanding Not: Modeling Negation in Language Models [81.21351681735973]
  Negation is a core construction in natural language. We propose to augment the language modeling objective with an unlikelihood objective that is based on negated generic sentences. We reduce the mean top1 error rate to 4% on the negated LAMA dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T21:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.