Reasoning over Video: Evaluating How MLLMs Extract, Integrate, and Reconstruct Spatiotemporal Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13091v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:40:42 GMT
• Title: Reasoning over Video: Evaluating How MLLMs Extract, Integrate, and Reconstruct Spatiotemporal Evidence
• Abstract summary: It is unclear whether large language models can perform abstracttemporal reasoning.<n>We present VA-BENCH, a benchmark comprising abstractive reasoning tasks together with their extractive counterparts.
• Score: 22.019359275289485
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing interest in embodied agents increases the demand for spatiotemporal video understanding, yet existing benchmarks largely emphasize extractive reasoning, where answers can be explicitly presented within spatiotemporal events. It remains unclear whether multimodal large language models can instead perform abstractive spatiotemporal reasoning, which requires integrating observations over time, combining dispersed cues, and inferring implicit spatial and contextual structure. To address this gap, we formalize abstractive spatiotemporal reasoning from videos by introducing a structured evaluation taxonomy that systematically targets its core dimensions and construct a controllable, scenario-driven synthetic egocentric video dataset tailored to evaluate abstractive spatiotemporal reasoning capabilities, spanning object-, room-, and floor-plan-level scenarios. Based on this framework, we present VAEX-BENCH, a benchmark comprising five abstractive reasoning tasks together with their extractive counterparts. Our extensive experiments compare the performance of state-of-the-art MLLMs under extractive and abstractive settings, exposing their limitations on abstractive tasks and providing a fine-grained analysis of the underlying bottlenecks. The dataset will be released soon.

Related papers

• ViSTR-Bench: Can MLLMs Reason from Continuous Visual Cues in Dynamic Scenes? [43.007245223642606]
  ViSTR-Bench is an evaluation suite designed to systematically assess whether MLLMs can perform qualitative reasoning from continuous visual cues in dynamic scenes.<n>The benchmark comprises 15 distinct subtasks and 1,340 high-quality video question-answer pairs spanning diverse tabletop, indoor, and outdoor scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T02:49:24Z)
• Learning to Watch: Active Video Anomaly Understanding via Interleaved Policy Optimization [56.150184676745205]
  Video anomaly understanding (VAU) relies on sparse, context-dependent cues.<n>We propose $Anomtext-$, a closed-loop framework that reconceptualizes video understanding as an active sequential decision-making process.<n>Inspired by human video-reviewing behavior, this framework unifies internal cognitive reasoning and strategic evidence acquisition into an interleaved policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T08:41:49Z)
• Tracking the Truth: Object-Centric Spatio-Temporal Monitoring for Video Large Language Models [154.39583176906893]
  Large language models (MLs) have advanced understanding, they remain highly prone to hallucinations in scenes.<n>We argue this stems from a failure intemporal monitoring, the ability to persistently track object dynamic identities, states, and relations over time.<n>Existing benchmarks obscure this deficit relying on single final-answer queries that can often be resolved via local visual cues or statistical priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T14:32:36Z)
• Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs [6.111899371682025]
  Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT.<n>We propose emph"Decompose, Look, and Reason" (DLR), a reinforced latent reasoning framework.<n>Experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that DLR consistently outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T18:52:27Z)
• Agentic Spatio-Temporal Grounding via Collaborative Reasoning [80.83158605034465]
  Temporal Video Grounding aims to retrieve thetemporal tube of a target object or person in a video given a text query.<n>We propose the Agentic Spatio-Temporal Grounder (ASTG) framework for the task of STVG towards an open-world and training-free scenario.<n>Specifically, two specialized agents SRA (Spatial Reasoning Agent) and TRA (Temporal Reasoning Agent) constructed leveraging on modern Multimoal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach where it outperforms existing weakly-supervised and zero-shot approaches by a margin
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T10:16:27Z)
• Abstract Activation Spaces for Content-Invariant Reasoning in Large Language Models [28.102903742881576]
  We introduce a framework for abstraction-guided reasoning that explicitly separates structural inference from lexical semantics.<n>We show that abstraction-aligned steering reduces content-driven errors and improves validity-sensitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:48:44Z)
• NarrativeTrack: Evaluating Video Language Models Beyond the Frame [10.244330591706744]
  We introduce NarrativeTrack, the first benchmark to evaluate narrative understanding in MLLMs.<n>We decompose videos into constituent entities and examine their continuity via a Compositional Reasoning (CRP) framework.<n>CRP challenges models to advance from temporal persistence to contextual evolution and fine-grained perceptual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T07:12:55Z)
• Priors in Time: Missing Inductive Biases for Language Model Interpretability [58.07412640266836]
  We show that Sparse Autoencoders impose priors that assume independence of concepts across time, implying stationarity.<n>We introduce a new interpretability objective -- Temporal Feature Analysis -- which possesses a temporal inductive bias to decompose representations at a given time into two parts.<n>Our results underscore the need for inductive biases that match the data in designing robust interpretability tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T18:43:48Z)
• Can an LLM Induce a Graph? Investigating Memory Drift and Context Length [11.214847796972705]
  Recently proposed evaluation benchmarks aim to characterize the effective context length and the forgetting tendencies of large language models (LLMs)<n>We argue for evaluating these models on more complex reasoning tasks that require them to induce structured relational knowledge from the text.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs begin to exhibit memory drift and contextual forgetting at much shorter effective lengths when tasked with this form of relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T01:56:07Z)
• Explaining multimodal LLMs via intra-modal token interactions [55.27436637894534]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks, yet their internal decision-making mechanisms remain insufficiently understood.<n>We propose enhancing interpretability by leveraging intra-modal interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:39:13Z)
• EmbodiedVSR: Dynamic Scene Graph-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Visual Spatial Tasks [24.41705039390567]
  EmbodiedVSR (Embodied Visual Spatial Reasoning) is a novel framework that integrates dynamic scene graph-guided Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>Our method enables zero-shot spatial reasoning without task-specific fine-tuning.<n>Experiments demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms existing MLLM-based methods in accuracy and reasoning coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T05:06:07Z)
• NeedleBench: Evaluating LLM Retrieval and Reasoning Across Varying Information Densities [51.07379913779232]
  NeedleBench is a framework for assessing retrieval and reasoning performance in long-context tasks.<n>It embeds key data points at varying depths to rigorously test model capabilities.<n>Our experiments reveal that reasoning models like Deep-R1 and OpenAI's o3 struggle with continuous retrieval and reasoning in information-dense scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:59:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.