Examining Risks in the AI Companion Application Ecosystem
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13620v1
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 21:56:48 GMT
- Title: Examining Risks in the AI Companion Application Ecosystem
- Abstract summary: We identify 489 unique apps from the App Store and Play Store that advertised AI companionship.<n>We categorize broader ecosystem trends that provide context for understanding threats.<n>This study provides a foundational security perspective on the AI companion application ecosystem.
- Score: 12.854101325854712
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: While computer systems that allow users to interact through conversational natural language (i.e., chatbots) have existed for many years, varying types of applications advertising AI companionship (e.g., Character AI, Replika) have proliferated in recent years due to advancements in large language models. Our work offers a threat model encompassing two distinct risk categories: harms posed to users by AI companion applications, and harms enabled by malicious users exploiting application features. To further understand this application ecosystem, we identified 489 unique apps from the App Store and Play Store that advertised AI companionship. We then systematically conducted and analyzed walkthroughs of a stratified sample of 30 apps with respect to our threat model. Through our analysis, we categorize broader ecosystem trends that provide context for understanding threats and identify specific threats related to sensitive data collection and sharing, anthropomorphism, engagement mechanisms, sexual interactions and media, as well as the ingestion and reconstruction of likeness, including the potential for generating synthetic nonconsensual intimate imagery. This study provides a foundational security perspective on the AI companion application ecosystem and informs future research within and beyond this field, policy, and technical development. Content warning: This paper includes descriptions of applications that can be used to create synthetic nonconsensual representations, including explicit imagery, as well as discussion of self-harm and suicidal ideation.
Related papers
- SoK: The Attack Surface of Agentic AI -- Tools, and Autonomy [3.340255811686752]
Recent AI systems combine large language models with tools, external knowledge via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>This agentic AI paradigm greatly expands capabilities - but also vastly enlarges the attack surface.<n>We develop a comprehensive taxonomy of attacks spanning prompt-level injections, knowledge-base poisoning, tool/plug-in exploits, and multi-agent emergent threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T08:21:51Z) - AI-Driven Cybersecurity Threats: A Survey of Emerging Risks and Defensive Strategies [0.0]
This paper aims to analyze emerging risks, attack mechanisms, and defense shortcomings related to AI in cybersecurity.<n>We introduce a comparative taxonomy connecting AI capabilities with threat modalities and defenses.<n>Our findings emphasize the urgency for explainable, interdisciplinary, and regulatory-compliant AI defense systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T05:09:40Z) - A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z) - A Proposal for Evaluating the Operational Risk for ChatBots based on Large Language Models [39.58317527488534]
We propose a novel, instrumented risk-assessment metric that simultaneously evaluates potential threats to three key stakeholders.<n>To validate our metric, we leverage Garak, an open-source framework for vulnerability testing.<n>Results underscore the importance of multi-dimensional risk assessments in operationalizing secure, reliable AI-driven conversational systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T20:26:45Z) - AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z) - Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike.
We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z) - HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions [95.49509269498367]
We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examining AI agent safety within diverse and complex social interactions.<n>We run 1840 simulations based on 92 scenarios across seven domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, education)<n>Our experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs, both proprietary and open-sourced, exhibit safety risks in over 50% cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T19:47:21Z) - Not My Voice! A Taxonomy of Ethical and Safety Harms of Speech Generators [2.500481442438427]
We analyse speech generation incidents to study how patterns of specific harms arise.
We propose a conceptual framework for modelling pathways to ethical and safety harms of AI.
Our relational approach captures the complexity of risks and harms in sociotechnical AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T11:47:06Z) - Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interaction [83.18367129924997]
"Agent AI" is a class of interactive systems that can perceive visual stimuli, language inputs, and other environmentally-grounded data.
We envision a future where people can easily create any virtual reality or simulated scene and interact with agents embodied within the virtual environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T19:11:18Z) - Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human
Intentions [46.87576410532481]
We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise.
Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions.
Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.