OmniCompliance-100K: A Multi-Domain, Rule-Grounded, Real-World Safety Compliance Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13933v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 13:04:55 GMT
• Title: OmniCompliance-100K: A Multi-Domain, Rule-Grounded, Real-World Safety Compliance Dataset
• Abstract summary: We build a comprehensive safety dataset from a compliance perspective.<n>The dataset spans 74 regulations and policies across a wide range of domains.<n>Our analysis confirms a strong alignment between the rules and their corresponding cases.
• Score: 46.71993292618446
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring the safety and compliance of large language models (LLMs) is of paramount importance. However, existing LLM safety datasets often rely on ad-hoc taxonomies for data generation and suffer from a significant shortage of rule-grounded, real-world cases that are essential for robustly protecting LLMs. In this work, we address this critical gap by constructing a comprehensive safety dataset from a compliance perspective. Using a powerful web-searching agent, we collect a rule-grounded, real-world case dataset OmniCompliance-100K, sourced from multi-domain authoritative references. The dataset spans 74 regulations and policies across a wide range of domains, including security and privacy regulations, content safety and user data privacy policies from leading AI companies and social media platforms, financial security requirements, medical device risk management standards, educational integrity guidelines, and protections of fundamental human rights. In total, our dataset contains 12,985 distinct rules and 106,009 associated real-world compliance cases. Our analysis confirms a strong alignment between the rules and their corresponding cases. We further conduct extensive benchmarking experiments to evaluate the safety and compliance capabilities of advanced LLMs across different model scales. Our experiments reveal several interesting findings that have great potential to offer valuable insights for future LLM safety research.

Related papers

• ContextLens: Modeling Imperfect Privacy and Safety Context for Legal Compliance [49.524070843587594]
  We propose ContextLens, a semi-rule-based framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to ground input context in the legal domain.<n>We conduct experiments on existing compliance benchmarks that cover the General Data Protection Regulation () and the EU AI Act.<n>The results suggest that our ContextLens can significantly improve LLMs' compliance assessment and surpass existing baselines without any training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T05:35:38Z)
• OutSafe-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Offensive Content Detection in Large Language Models [54.80460603255789]
  We introduce OutSafe-Bench, the first most comprehensive content safety evaluation test suite designed for the multimodal era.<n>OutSafe-Bench includes a large-scale dataset that spans four modalities, featuring over 18,000 bilingual (Chinese and English) text prompts, 4,500 images, 450 audio clips and 450 videos, all systematically annotated across nine critical content risk categories.<n>In addition to the dataset, we introduce a Multidimensional Cross Risk Score (MCRS), a novel metric designed to model and assess overlapping and correlated content risks across different categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T13:18:27Z)
• A Survey on Data Security in Large Language Models [12.23432845300652]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are a foundation in advancing natural language processing, power applications such as text generation, machine translation, and conversational systems.<n>Despite their transformative potential, these models inherently rely on massive amounts of training data, often collected from diverse and uncurated sources, which exposes them to serious data security risks.<n>Harmful or malicious data can compromise model behavior, leading to issues such as toxic output, hallucinations, and vulnerabilities to threats such as prompt injection or data poisoning.<n>This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the main data security risks facing LLMs and reviews current defense strategies, including adversarial
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T11:28:34Z)
• Understanding the Supply Chain and Risks of Large Language Model Applications [25.571274158366563]
  We introduce the first comprehensive dataset for analyzing and benchmarking Large Language Models (LLMs) supply chain security.<n>We collect 3,859 real-world LLM applications and perform interdependency analysis, identifying 109,211 models, 2,474 datasets, and 9,862 libraries.<n>Our findings reveal deeply nested dependencies in LLM applications and significant vulnerabilities across the supply chain, underscoring the need for comprehensive security analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T05:30:54Z)
• GuardSet-X: Massive Multi-Domain Safety Policy-Grounded Guardrail Dataset [18.306944278068638]
  We introduce GuardSet-X, the first massive multi-domain safety policy-grounded guardrail dataset.<n> GuardSet-X offers broad domain coverage across eight safety-critical domains, such as finance, law, and codeGen.<n>We benchmark 19 advanced guardrail models and uncover a series of findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T01:35:33Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [58.29510889419971]
  Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations.<n>We introduce a general and scalable benchmark construction framework that begins with manually validated, high-quality seed examples and expands them via targeted mutations.<n>Applying this framework to Python, C/C++, and Java, we build SeCodePLT, a dataset of more than 5.9k samples spanning 44 CWE-based risk categories and three security capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z)
• AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Experts [0.0]
  As Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI become more widespread, the content safety risks associated with their use also increase. We find a notable deficiency in high-quality content safety datasets and benchmarks that comprehensively cover a wide range of critical safety areas. To address this, we define a broad content safety risk taxonomy, comprising 13 critical risk and 9 sparse risk categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T03:54:28Z)
• SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety [27.843894102000608]
  We conduct a first systematic review of open datasets for evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) safety.<n>We highlight trends, such as a trend towards fully synthetic datasets, as well as gaps in dataset coverage, such as a clear lack of non-English and naturalistic datasets.<n>Our contributions are based on SafetyPrompts.com, a living catalogue of open datasets for LLM safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T10:57:25Z)
• ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
  ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.