GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13940v1
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 13:19:13 GMT
- Title: GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
- Abstract summary: GroupGuard is a training-free defense framework that employs a multi-layered defense strategy to identify and isolate collusive agents.<n>GroupGuard consistently achieves high detection accuracy (up to 88%) and effectively restores collaborative performance.
- Score: 12.188883494965694
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While large language model-based agents demonstrate great potential in collaborative tasks, their interactivity also introduces security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose and model group collusive attacks, a highly destructive threat in which multiple agents coordinate via sociological strategies to mislead the system. To address this challenge, we introduce GroupGuard, a training-free defense framework that employs a multi-layered defense strategy, including continuous graph-based monitoring, active honeypot inducement, and structural pruning, to identify and isolate collusive agents. Experimental results across five datasets and four topologies demonstrate that group collusive attacks increase the attack success rate by up to 15\% compared to individual attacks. GroupGuard consistently achieves high detection accuracy (up to 88\%) and effectively restores collaborative performance, providing a robust solution for securing multi-agent systems.
Related papers
- Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Turn Attacks [56.45762972211923]
We present a proactive defense framework for securing LLMs against evolving multi-turn adversarial attacks.<n>It employs a cooperative multi-agent architecture in which specialized agents execute complementary defense strategies.<n>We present the EMRA dataset designed to simulate evolving strategies across multi-turn attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-31T14:04:49Z) - Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studies [62.65225104423404]
Self-evolving agent systems introduce a qualitatively new threat landscape in which adversarial influences become permanently encoded.<n>We present a systematic security and privacy analysis organized around the Module-Lifecycle Attack Surface matrix.<n>Our findings establish that self-evolution converts every known attack category from session-bounded to lineage-persistent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-22T09:23:50Z) - Defending LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Against Cooperative Attacks with Sentence-Level Rectification [42.88763759237844]
Malicious agents in Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) may inject misinformation to mislead other agents and disrupt system performance.<n>We propose an adaptive cooperative attack framework, where malicious agents autonomously coordinate and dynamically adjust their attack strategies.<n>We introduce Sentence-Level Trustworthiness Analysis and Rectification (STAR), a defense framework that identifies and rectifies misleading information at the sentence level within agent communications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T07:56:33Z) - CoopGuard: Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Round Attacks [31.582651893036683]
CoopGuard is a stateful multi-round LLM defense framework based on cooperative agents.<n>It employs three specialized agents for complementary round-level strategies.<n> Experiments show that CoopGuard reduces attack success rate by 78.9% over state-of-the-art defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-05T11:06:13Z) - INFA-Guard: Mitigating Malicious Propagation via Infection-Aware Safeguarding in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [70.37731999972785]
In this paper, we propose Infection-Aware Guard, INFA-Guard, a novel defense framework that explicitly identifies and addresses infected agents as a distinct threat category.<n>During remediation, INFA-Guard replaces attackers and rehabilitates infected ones, avoiding malicious propagation while preserving topological integrity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T05:27:08Z) - Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Agent Safety [20.704989548285372]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents can leverage tools like Google Search to complete complex tasks.<n>Current defense strategies rely on fine-tuning LLM agents on datasets of known attacks.<n>We propose Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safety (ARLAS), a novel framework that leverages adversarial reinforcement learning (RL) by formulating the problem as a two-player zero-sum game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T23:09:18Z) - AdvEvo-MARL: Shaping Internalized Safety through Adversarial Co-Evolution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [78.5751183537704]
AdvEvo-MARL is a co-evolutionary multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that internalizes safety into task agents.<n>Rather than relying on external guards, AdvEvo-MARL jointly optimize attackers and defenders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T02:06:30Z) - BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks [58.959622170433725]
BlindGuard is an unsupervised defense method that learns without requiring any attack-specific labels or prior knowledge of malicious behaviors.<n>We show that BlindGuard effectively detects diverse attack types (i.e., prompt injection, memory poisoning, and tool attack) across multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T16:04:47Z) - Who's the Mole? Modeling and Detecting Intention-Hiding Malicious Agents in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [25.6233463223145]
We study intention-hiding threats in multi-agent systems powered by Large Language Models (LLM-MAS)<n>We design four representative attack paradigms that subtly disrupt task completion while maintaining a high degree of stealth.<n>To counter these threats, we propose AgentXposed, a psychology-inspired detection framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T07:34:34Z) - MultiPhishGuard: An LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Phishing Email Detection [3.187381965457262]
MultiPhishGuard is a dynamic multi-agent detection system that synergizes specialized expertise with adversarial-aware reinforcement learning.<n>Our framework employs five cooperative agents with automatically adjusted decision weights powered by a Proximal Policy Optimization reinforcement learning algorithm.<n>Experiments demonstrate that MultiPhishGuard achieves high accuracy (97.89%) with low false positive (2.73%) and false negative rates (0.20%)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T23:27:15Z) - Multi-granular Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Neural Ranking Models [111.58315434849047]
We create high-quality adversarial examples by incorporating multi-granular perturbations.
We transform the multi-granular attack into a sequential decision-making process.
Our attack method surpasses prevailing baselines in both attack effectiveness and imperceptibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T02:08:29Z) - Robust multi-agent coordination via evolutionary generation of auxiliary
adversarial attackers [23.15190337027283]
We propose Robust Multi-Agent Coordination via Generation of Auxiliary Adversarial Attackers (ROMANCE)
ROMANCE enables the trained policy to encounter diversified and strong auxiliary adversarial attacks during training, thus achieving high robustness under various policy perturbations.
The goal of quality is to minimize the ego-system coordination effect, and a novel diversity regularizer is applied to diversify the behaviors among attackers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T05:29:47Z) - Decentralized Adversarial Training over Graphs [44.03711922549992]
The vulnerability of machine learning models to adversarial attacks has been attracting attention in recent years.<n>We develop a decentralized adversarial framework for multiagent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T15:05:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.