Motivation in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14347v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 12:30:36 GMT
• Title: Motivation in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance.<n>As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation.<n>Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology.
• Score: 14.984642061188055
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance. As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation. We examine whether LLMs "report" varying levels of motivation, how these reports relate to their behavior, and whether external factors can influence them. Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology: self-reported motivation aligns with different behavioral signatures, varies across task types, and can be modulated by external manipulations. These findings demonstrate that motivation is a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, systematically linking reports, choices, effort, and performance, and revealing motivational dynamics that resemble those documented in human psychology. This perspective deepens our understanding of model behavior and its connection to human-inspired concepts.

Related papers

• Are Large Language Models Sensitive to the Motives Behind Communication? [9.246336669308665]
  Large language models (LLMs) and AI agents process information inherently framed by humans' intentions and incentives.<n>For LLMs to be effective in the real world, they too must critically evaluate content by factoring in the motivations of the source.<n>We employ controlled experiments from cognitive science to verify that LLMs' behavior is consistent with rational models of learning from motivated testimony.<n>We find that LLMs' inferences do not track the rational models nearly as closely -- partly due to additional information that distracts them from vigilance-relevant considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T15:35:00Z)
• The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs [60.15472325639723]
  Personality traits have long been studied as predictors of human behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest similar patterns may emerge in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T21:27:10Z)
• Mind the Gap: The Divergence Between Human and LLM-Generated Tasks [12.96670500625407]
  We compare human task generation with that of an agent powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that human task generation is consistently influenced by psychological drivers, including personal values and cognitive style.<n>We conclude that there is a core gap between the value-driven, embodied nature of human cognition and the statistical patterns of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T03:00:41Z)
• Exploring the Personality Traits of LLMs through Latent Features Steering [12.142248881876355]
  We investigate how factors, such as cultural norms and environmental stressors, encoded within large language models (LLMs) shape their personality traits.<n>We propose a training-free approach to modify the model's behavior by extracting and steering latent features corresponding to factors within the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T21:02:34Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
  This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• Learning Goal-based Movement via Motivational-based Models in Cognitive Mobile Robots [58.720142291102135]
  Humans have needs motivating their behavior according to intensity and context. We also create preferences associated with each action's perceived pleasure, which is susceptible to changes over time. This makes decision-making more complex, requiring learning to balance needs and preferences according to the context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T04:52:24Z)
• COMMA: Modeling Relationship among Motivations, Emotions and Actions in Language-based Human Activities [12.206523349060179]
  Motivations, emotions, and actions are inter-related essential factors in human activities. We present the first study that investigates the viability of modeling motivations, emotions, and actions in language-based human activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T07:54:20Z)
• Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models [78.19379997967191]
  We draw inspiration from psychometric studies by leveraging human personality theory as a tool for studying machine behaviors. To answer these questions, we introduce the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI) tool for studying machine behaviors. MPI follows standardized personality tests, built upon the Big Five Personality Factors (Big Five) theory and personality assessment inventories. We devise a Personality Prompting (P2) method to induce LLMs with specific personalities in a controllable way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T07:32:57Z)
• Tracking Emotions: Intrinsic Motivation Grounded on Multi-Level Prediction Error Dynamics [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss how emotions arise when differences between expected and actual rates of progress towards a goal are experienced. We present an intrinsic motivation architecture that generates behaviors towards self-generated and dynamic goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T06:53:13Z)
• Intrinsic Motivation for Encouraging Synergistic Behavior [55.10275467562764]
  We study the role of intrinsic motivation as an exploration bias for reinforcement learning in sparse-reward synergistic tasks. Our key idea is that a good guiding principle for intrinsic motivation in synergistic tasks is to take actions which affect the world in ways that would not be achieved if the agents were acting on their own.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T19:34:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.