StAR: Segment Anything Reasoner

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14382v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 13:43:34 GMT
• Title: StAR: Segment Anything Reasoner
• Abstract summary: We present Segment Anything Reasoner (StAR), a comprehensive framework that refines the design space from multiple perspectives.<n>StAR achieves significant gains over its base counterparts across extensive benchmarks.
• Score: 11.958150552719296
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As AI systems are being integrated more rapidly into diverse and complex real-world environments, the ability to perform holistic reasoning over an implicit query and an image to localize a target is becoming increasingly important. However, recent reasoning segmentation methods fail to sufficiently elicit the visual reasoning capabilities of the base mode. In this work, we present Segment Anything Reasoner (StAR), a comprehensive framework that refines the design space from multiple perspectives-including parameter-tuning scheme, reward functions, learning strategies and answer format-and achieves substantial improvements over recent baselines. In addition, for the first time, we successfully introduce parallel test-time scaling to the segmentation task, pushing the performance boundary even further. To extend the scope and depth of reasoning covered by existing benchmark, we also construct the ReasonSeg-X, which compactly defines reasoning types and includes samples that require deeper reasoning. Leveraging this dataset, we train StAR with a rollout-expanded selective-tuning approach to activate the base model's latent reasoning capabilities, and establish a rigorous benchmark for systematic, fine-grained evaluation of advanced methods. With only 5k training samples, StAR achieves significant gains over its base counterparts across extensive benchmarks, demonstrating that our method effectively brings dormant reasoning competence to the surface.

Related papers

• Advantage-Guided Gate: Reshaping Open-Ended Reasoning for Vision-Based Spatial Intelligence [70.8951332710039]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in complex spatial scene understanding and reasoning tasks.<n>However, their open-ended reasoning process is prone to decision errors and error accumulation, leading to instability in answer quality.<n>We propose an advantage-guided gating framework that dynamically intervenes in and corrects deviations during the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T07:46:04Z)
• Beyond Visual Grasping: Benchmarking Complex Grasping from Detection to Execution [20.75638062019513]
  We propose GCA-Bench, a benchmark featuring challenging textitgrasping with complex action scenarios.<n>We implement a diverse set of baselines, ranging from traditional grasp detection pipelines to end-to-end learning methods.<n>In addition, we propose new evaluation metrics, analyze critical failure models, and provide insights to guide the development of more robust and generalizable grasping strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T20:10:09Z)
• Segment-Aligned Policy Optimization for Multi-Modal Reasoning [55.29606572822562]
  We propose a novel reinforcement learning paradigm that treats coherent reasoning steps, rather than tokens or full sequences as fundamental units of policy update.<n>Experiments on representative reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAPO consistently outperforms token-level and sequence-level policy optimization methods.<n>Our work underscores the importance of aligning reinforcement learning updates with the structure of reasoning, paving the way for more efficient and semantically grounded policy optimization in complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T08:47:45Z)
• DiffuReason: Bridging Latent Reasoning and Generative Refinement for Sequential Recommendation [20.756497463882763]
  We propose DiffuReason, a unified "Think-then-Diffuse" framework for sequential recommendation.<n>It integrates multi-step Thinking Tokens for latent reasoning, diffusion-based refinement for denoising intermediate representations, and end-to-end Group Relative Policy Optimization.<n>Experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that DiffuReason consistently improves diverse backbone architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T12:55:30Z)
• RegionReasoner: Region-Grounded Multi-Round Visual Reasoning [69.75509909581133]
  RegionReasoner is a reinforcement learning framework for visual reasoning.<n>It enforces grounded reasoning by requiring each reasoning trace to explicitly cite the corresponding reference bounding boxes.<n>RegionReasoner is optimized with structured rewards combining grounding fidelity and global-local semantic alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T16:52:16Z)
• Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
  Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z)
• Optimizing Generative Ranking Relevance via Reinforcement Learning in Xiaohongshu Search [32.56725829132154]
  We investigate whether explicit reasoning can enhance both interpretability and performance in relevance modeling.<n>In this work, we formulate relevance modeling in Xiaohongshu search as a reasoning task.<n>We introduce a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based training framework to enhance the grounded reasoning capabilities of GRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T16:31:16Z)
• Step-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models [57.42778606399764]
  Diffusion language models (dLLMs) offer a promising, non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation.<n>Current reinforcement learning approaches often rely on sparse, outcome-based rewards.<n>We argue that this stems from a fundamental mismatch with the natural structure of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T00:34:15Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• AURORA: Augmented Understanding via Structured Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Reference Audio-Visual Segmentation [113.75682363364004]
  AURORA is a framework designed to enhance genuine reasoning and language comprehension in reference audio-visual segmentation.<n>AURORA achieves state-of-the-art performance on Ref-AVS benchmarks and generalizes effectively to unreferenced segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T07:47:38Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• AirRAG: Autonomous Strategic Planning and Reasoning Steer Retrieval Augmented Generation [5.92279459782447]
  We propose a novel thinking pattern in RAG that integrates autonomous strategic planning with efficient reasoning actions.<n>Specifically, our approach designs five fundamental reasoning actions, which are expanded to a broad tree-based reasoning space.<n> Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of AirRAG, showing significant performance gains on complex question-answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T09:16:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.