Dynamic Theory of Mind as a Temporal Memory Problem: Evidence from Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14646v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 22:54:03 GMT
• Title: Dynamic Theory of Mind as a Temporal Memory Problem: Evidence from Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Theory of Mind (ToM) is central to social cognition and human-AI interaction.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used to help understand and represent ToM.<n>We introduce DToM-Track to investigate temporal belief reasoning in controlled multiturn conversations.
• Score: 0.8666275811953881
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Theory of Mind (ToM) is central to social cognition and human-AI interaction, and Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used to help understand and represent ToM. However, most evaluations treat ToM as a static judgment at a single moment, primarily relying on tests of false beliefs. This overlooks a key dynamic dimension of ToM: the ability to represent, update, and retrieve others' beliefs over time. We investigate dynamic ToM as a temporally extended representational memory problem, asking whether LLMs can track belief trajectories across interactions rather than only inferring current beliefs. We introduce DToM-Track, an evaluation framework to investigate temporal belief reasoning in controlled multiturn conversations, testing the recall of beliefs held prior to an update, the inference of current beliefs, and the detection of belief change. Using LLMs as computational probes, we find a consistent asymmetry: models reliably infer an agent's current belief but struggle to maintain and retrieve prior belief states once updates occur. This pattern persists across LLM model families and scales, and is consistent with recency bias and interference effects well documented in cognitive science. These results suggest that tracking belief trajectories over time poses a distinct challenge beyond classical false-belief reasoning. By framing ToM as a problem of temporal representation and retrieval, this work connects ToM to core cognitive mechanisms of memory and interference and exposes the implications for LLM models of social reasoning in extended human-AI interactions.

Related papers

• OmniToM: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in LLMs via Explicit Belief Modeling [49.9159527733006]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) is commonly evaluated in large language models (LLMs) using end-point question answering.<n>This paradigm obscures whether the model actually constructs the underlying mental-state representations required for robust reasoning.<n>We introduce OmniToM, a benchmark that directly evaluates these representations by requiring explicit modeling of belief structures for all relevant actors within a narrative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T20:45:08Z)
• Tracking the Truth: Object-Centric Spatio-Temporal Monitoring for Video Large Language Models [154.39583176906893]
  Large language models (MLs) have advanced understanding, they remain highly prone to hallucinations in scenes.<n>We argue this stems from a failure intemporal monitoring, the ability to persistently track object dynamic identities, states, and relations over time.<n>Existing benchmarks obscure this deficit relying on single final-answer queries that can often be resolved via local visual cues or statistical priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T14:32:36Z)
• Learning Dynamic Belief Graphs for Theory-of-mind Reasoning [5.807546348023422]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires inferring how people's implicit, evolving beliefs shape what they seek and how they act under uncertainty.<n>We introduce a structured cognitive trajectory model for LLM-based ToM that represents mental state as a dynamic belief graph.<n>Our model significantly improves action prediction and recovers interpretable belief trajectories consistent with human reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T17:46:55Z)
• Beyond Words: Evaluating and Bridging Epistemic Divergence in User-Agent Interaction via Theory of Mind [8.740788873949471]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and are widely applied to both general-purpose and professional tasks.<n>They still struggle to comprehend and respond to the true user needs when intentions and instructions are imprecisely conveyed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T16:01:59Z)
• Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts [79.1081247754018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely deployed in reasoning, planning, and decision-making tasks.<n>We propose a framework based on Contact Searching Questions(CSQ) to quantify the likelihood of deception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T14:46:35Z)
• DEL-ToM: Inference-Time Scaling for Theory-of-Mind Reasoning via Dynamic Epistemic Logic [34.90622503586192]
  Theory-of-Mind (ToM) tasks pose a unique challenge for large language models.<n>We propose DEL-ToM, a framework that improves verifiable ToM reasoning through inference-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T23:52:56Z)
• EnigmaToM: Improve LLMs' Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities with Neural Knowledge Base of Entity States [15.557449564031975]
  Theory-of-Mind (ToM) is fundamental to human interaction but remains challenging for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present EnigmaToM, a novel neuro-symbolic framework that enhances ToM reasoning by integrating a Neural Knowledge Base of entity states (Enigma)<n> Experimental results on ToMi, HiToM, and FANToM benchmarks show that EnigmaToM significantly improves ToM reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T10:13:05Z)
• Re-evaluating Theory of Mind evaluation in large language models [3.262532929657758]
  We take inspiration from cognitive science to re-evaluate the state of ToM evaluation in large language models.<n>A major reason for the disagreement on whether LLMs have ToM is a lack of clarity on whether models should be expected to match human behaviors.<n>We conclude by discussing several directions for future research, including the relationship between ToM and pragmatic communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:36:57Z)
• Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models [51.91448005607405]
  We evaluate key human ToM precursors by annotating characters' perceptions on ToMi and FANToM. We present PercepToM, a novel ToM method leveraging LLMs' strong perception inference capability while supplementing their limited perception-to-belief inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T14:58:29Z)
• TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind [18.258876784733733]
  We present TimeToM, which constructs a temporal space and uses it as the foundation to improve the ToM capabilities of Large Language Models. We design a novel tool-belief solver that, by considering belief communication between characters in temporal space, can transform a character's higher-order beliefs into another character's first-order beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:50:49Z)
• Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind Capabilities [63.90227161974381]
  SimToM is a novel prompting framework inspired by Simulation Theory's notion of perspective-taking. Our approach, which requires no additional training and minimal prompt-tuning, shows substantial improvement over existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T22:49:27Z)
• FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions [94.61530480991627]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focus on testing models using passive narratives that inherently lack interactivity. We introduce FANToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test ToM within information-asymmetric conversational contexts via question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:24:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.