Seamless Deception: Larger Language Models Are Better Knowledge Concealers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14672v2
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:35:23 GMT
- Title: Seamless Deception: Larger Language Models Are Better Knowledge Concealers
- Abstract summary: Language Models (LMs) may acquire harmful knowledge, and feign ignorance of these topics when under audit.<n>Inspired by the recent discovery of deception-related behaviour patterns in LMs, we aim to train classifiers that detect when a LM is actively concealing knowledge.
- Score: 26.38326875955904
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Language Models (LMs) may acquire harmful knowledge, and yet feign ignorance of these topics when under audit. Inspired by the recent discovery of deception-related behaviour patterns in LMs, we aim to train classifiers that detect when a LM is actively concealing knowledge. Initial findings on smaller models show that classifiers can detect concealment more reliably than human evaluators, with gradient-based concealment proving easier to identify than prompt-based methods. However, contrary to prior work, we find that the classifiers do not reliably generalize to unseen model architectures and topics of hidden knowledge. Most concerningly, the identifiable traces associated with concealment become fainter as the models increase in scale, with the classifiers achieving no better than random performance on any model exceeding 70 billion parameters. Our results expose a key limitation in black-box-only auditing of LMs and highlight the need to develop robust methods to detect models that are actively hiding the knowledge they contain.
Related papers
- Exploring and Bridging Knowledge Holes in Unlearned Multimodal Large Language Models [23.51933427959403]
We propose a benchmark that captures unintended degradation on benign inputs sharing generic patterns with the forget set.<n>We also propose Selective Protection with Anchored Regularization, which protects generic patterns via anchored activation filtering.<n>Our experiments on SafeEraser demonstrate that SPAR recovers over 98% of vanilla response quality compared to below 50% for standard baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T07:57:34Z) - FIKA-Bench: From Fine-grained Recognition to Fine-Grained Knowledge Acquisition [54.31138496553705]
Fine-grained recognition in everyday life is often not a closed-book classification problem.<n>Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate visually recognition, leaving this active external knowledge acquisition ability underexplored.<n>We study fine-grained knowledge acquisition, where a system must seek, verify, and use external evidence to answer open-ended fine-grained recognition questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T08:49:51Z) - An Illusion of Unlearning? Assessing Machine Unlearning Through Internal Representations [16.917151304941967]
We show that state-of-the-art machine unlearning methods appear successful mainly due to a misalignment between last-layer features and the classifier.<n> hidden features remain highly discriminative, and simple linear probing can recover near-original accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T14:02:23Z) - Generative Human-Object Interaction Detection via Differentiable Cognitive Steering of Multi-modal LLMs [85.69785384599827]
Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to localize human-object pairs and the interactions between them.<n>Existing methods operate under a closed-world assumption, treating the task as a classification problem over a small, predefined verb set.<n>We propose GRASP-HO, a novel Generative Reasoning And Steerable Perception framework that reformulates HOI detection from the closed-set classification task to the open-vocabulary generation problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-19T14:41:50Z) - Neural Breadcrumbs: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs Through Hidden State and Attention Pattern Analysis [9.529147118376464]
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) reveal whether specific data was used to train machine learning models.<n>Our work explores how examining internal representations, rather than just their outputs, may provide additional insights into potential membership inference signals.<n>Our findings suggest that internal model behaviors can reveal aspects of training data exposure even when output-based signals appear protected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-05T19:05:49Z) - Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model Outputs [23.538087984484207]
Machine unlearning (MU) for large language models (LLMs) seeks to remove specific undesirable data or knowledge from a trained model.<n>We identify a new vulnerability post-unlearning: unlearning trace detection.<n>We demonstrate that unlearning traces can be detected with over 90% accuracy even under forget-irrelevant inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T21:03:51Z) - Aggregation Artifacts in Subjective Tasks Collapse Large Language Models' Posteriors [74.04775677110179]
In-context Learning (ICL) has become the primary method for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we examine whether this is the result of the aggregation used in corresponding datasets, where trying to combine low-agreement, disparate annotations might lead to annotation artifacts that create detrimental noise in the prompt.<n>Our results indicate that aggregation is a confounding factor in the modeling of subjective tasks, and advocate focusing on modeling individuals instead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T17:16:00Z) - Embedding-Informed Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [37.02290559379761]
Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) have been remarkably competent in various NLP tasks.<n>Motivated by this, Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ARAG) studies retrieving only when the knowledge asked by the query is absent in the LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T15:21:22Z) - Unsupervised Continual Anomaly Detection with Contrastively-learned
Prompt [80.43623986759691]
We introduce a novel Unsupervised Continual Anomaly Detection framework called UCAD.
The framework equips the UAD with continual learning capability through contrastively-learned prompts.
We conduct comprehensive experiments and set the benchmark on unsupervised continual anomaly detection and segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T03:37:11Z) - Unleashing Mask: Explore the Intrinsic Out-of-Distribution Detection
Capability [70.72426887518517]
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is an indispensable aspect of secure AI when deploying machine learning models in real-world applications.
We propose a novel method, Unleashing Mask, which aims to restore the OOD discriminative capabilities of the well-trained model with ID data.
Our method utilizes a mask to figure out the memorized atypical samples, and then finetune the model or prune it with the introduced mask to forget them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T14:23:34Z) - Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for
Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews.
We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.