Are We Automating the Joy Out of Work? Designing AI to Augment Work, Not Meaning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14963v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:21:12 GMT
• Title: Are We Automating the Joy Out of Work? Designing AI to Augment Work, Not Meaning
• Abstract summary: We surveyed workers and developers on a representative sample of 171 tasks.<n>We find that tasks that workers associate with a sense of agency or happiness may be disproportionately exposed to AI.<n>To address these gaps, we call for AI whose design explicitly focuses on meaningful work and worker needs.
• Score: 21.341678137262054
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Prior work has mapped which workplace tasks are exposed to AI, but less is known about whether workers perceive these tasks as meaningful or as busywork. We examined: (1) which dimensions of meaningful work do workers associate with tasks exposed to AI; and (2) how do the traits of existing AI systems compare to the traits workers want. We surveyed workers and developers on a representative sample of 171 tasks and use language models (LMs) to scale ratings to 10,131 computer-assisted tasks across all U.S. occupations. Worryingly, we find that tasks that workers associate with a sense of agency or happiness may be disproportionately exposed to AI. We also document design gaps: developers report emphasizing politeness, strictness, and imagination in system design; by contrast, workers prefer systems that are straightforward, tolerant, and practical. To address these gaps, we call for AI whose design explicitly focuses on meaningful work and worker needs, proposing a five-part research agenda.

Related papers

• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• Will AI Agents Free Us From Meaningless Work? A Human-Centered Analysis [9.976808645232296]
  Using ratings from 202 workers on 171 workplace tasks, we show that perceived bullshitness strongly predicts desire for AI delegation.<n>These findings suggest that tasks perceived as bullshit are natural candidates for AI delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T14:34:44Z)
• What Work is AI Actually Doing? Uncovering the Drivers of Generative AI Adoption [1.4977849232424492]
  This study investigates which intrinsic task characteristics drive users' decisions to delegate work to AI systems.<n>This research provides the first systematic evidence linking real-world generative AI usage to a comprehensive, multi-dimensional framework of intrinsic task characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T19:13:37Z)
• How Do AI Agents Do Human Work? Comparing AI and Human Workflows Across Diverse Occupations [112.57167042285437]
  We study how agents do human work by presenting the first direct comparison of human and agent workers.<n>We find that agents deliver results 88.3% faster and cost 90.4-96.2% less than humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T18:10:22Z)
• AI Where It Matters: Where, Why, and How Developers Want AI Support in Daily Work [3.1984206905916]
  Generative AI is reshaping software work, yet we lack clear guidance on where developers most need and want support.<n>We report a large-scale, mixed-methods study of N=860 developers that examines where, why, and how they seek or limit AI help.<n>Our results offer concrete, contextual guidance for delivering AI where it matters to developers and their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T10:51:03Z)
• Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. Workforce [45.348336032930845]
  We introduce a novel framework to assess which occupational tasks workers want AI agents to automate or augment.<n>Our framework features an audio-enhanced mini-interview to capture nuanced worker desires.<n>We construct the WORKBank database to capture preferences from 1,500 domain workers and capability assessments from AI experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T23:05:52Z)
• TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks [55.03911355902567]
  We introduce TheAgentCompany, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker.<n>We find that the most competitive agent can complete 30% of tasks autonomously.<n>This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with simulating LM agents in a setting a real workplace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T18:55:40Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs requiring a graduate or postgraduate level of education.<n>Even in high-skill occupations, AI exhibits high variability in task substitution, suggesting that AI and humans complement each other within the same occupation.<n>All results, models, and code are freely available online to allow the community to reproduce our results, compare outcomes, and use our work as a benchmark to monitor AI's progress over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
  Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence.<n>WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IT identity: Antecedents Identifying with AI Applications [0.76146285961466]
  replacing managers with AI systems may have a negative impact on workers outcomes. It is unclear if workers receive the same benefits from their relationships with AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T10:59:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.