Directional Embedding Smoothing for Robust Vision Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15259v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 13:25:29 GMT
- Title: Directional Embedding Smoothing for Robust Vision Language Models
- Abstract summary: We extend the Randomized Embedding Smoothing and Token Aggregation (RESTA) defense to vision-language models (VLMs)<n>We evaluate RESTA's performance against the JailBreakV-28K benchmark of multi-modal jailbreaking attacks.
- Score: 20.603753314256704
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The safety and reliability of vision-language models (VLMs) are a crucial part of deploying trustworthy agentic AI systems. However, VLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks that undermine their safety alignment to yield harmful outputs. In this work, we extend the Randomized Embedding Smoothing and Token Aggregation (RESTA) defense to VLMs and evaluate its performance against the JailBreakV-28K benchmark of multi-modal jailbreaking attacks. We find that RESTA is effective in reducing attack success rate over this diverse corpus of attacks, in particular, when employing directional embedding noise, where the injected noise is aligned with the original token embedding vectors. Our results demonstrate that RESTA can contribute to securing VLMs within agentic systems, as a lightweight, inference-time defense layer of an overall security framework.
Related papers
- Uncovering Linguistic Fragility in Vision-Language-Action Models via Diversity-Aware Red Teaming [64.48633529149579]
We propose a novel framework to expose the vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models against linguistic variations.<n>Our method reduces the average task success rate from 93.33% to 5.85%, demonstrating a scalable approach to stress-testing VLA agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T08:43:36Z) - Risk Awareness Injection: Calibrating Vision-Language Models for Safety without Compromising Utility [26.564913442069866]
Vision language models (VLMs) extend the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to cross-modal settings.<n>Existing defenses rely on safety fine-tuning or aggressive token manipulations, incurring substantial training costs or significantly degrading utility.<n>We propose Risk Awareness Injection (RAI), a lightweight and training-free framework for safety calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T11:26:05Z) - AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z) - Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Dynamic Token Reweighting [28.675118345987887]
Large vision-language models (VLMs) are highly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.<n>We present a novel inference-time defense that mitigates multimodal jailbreak attacks.<n>We introduce a new formulation of the safety-relevant distributional shift induced by the visual modality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T03:00:39Z) - Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-based Attacks [10.44351773183656]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks when processing noisy or corrupted images.<n>To address this challenge, we propose Robust-VLGuard, a multimodal safety dataset aligned with misaligned image-text pairs.<n>For stronger optimization-based visual perturbation attacks, we propose DiffPure-VLM, leveraging diffusion models to convert adversarial perturbations into Gaussian-like noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T02:35:19Z) - CeTAD: Towards Certified Toxicity-Aware Distance in Vision Language Models [16.5022773312661]
We propose a universal certified defence framework to safeguard large vision-language models against jailbreak attacks.<n>First, we proposed a novel distance metric to quantify semantic discrepancies between malicious and intended responses.<n>Then, we devise a regressed certification approach that employs randomized smoothing to provide formal robustness guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T17:33:55Z) - Smoothed Embeddings for Robust Language Models [11.97873981355746]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks that subvert alignment and induce harmful outputs.<n>We propose the Randomized Embedding Smoothing and Token Aggregation (RESTA) defense, which adds random noise to the embedding vectors and performs aggregation during the generation of each output token.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves superior robustness versus utility tradeoffs compared to the baseline defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-27T20:57:26Z) - Retention Score: Quantifying Jailbreak Risks for Vision Language Models [60.48306899271866]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are integrated with Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance multi-modal machine learning capabilities.<n>This paper aims to assess the resilience of VLMs against jailbreak attacks that can compromise model safety compliance and result in harmful outputs.<n>To evaluate a VLM's ability to maintain its robustness against adversarial input perturbations, we propose a novel metric called the textbfRetention Score.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T13:05:51Z) - Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs)<n>Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs.<n> Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z) - Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic
Smoothing [107.97160023681184]
Aligned large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks.
We propose SEMANTICSMOOTH, a smoothing-based defense that aggregates predictions of semantically transformed copies of a given input prompt.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:36:03Z) - Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.