Prompts Blend Requirements and Solutions: From Intent to Implementation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16348v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:31:44 GMT
• Title: Prompts Blend Requirements and Solutions: From Intent to Implementation
• Abstract summary: We argue that prompts should be understood as lightweight, evolving requirement artifacts that blend requirements with solution guidance.<n>Our vision is to empirically evaluate these hypotheses through analysis of real-world AI-assisted development.
• Score: 3.6821798169139366
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: AI coding assistants are reshaping software development by shifting focus from writing code to formulating prompts. In chat-focused approaches such as vibe coding, prompts become the primary arbiter between human intent and executable software. While Requirements Engineering (RE) emphasizes capturing, validating, and evolving requirements, current prompting practices remain informal and adhoc. We argue that prompts should be understood as lightweight, evolving requirement artifacts that blend requirements with solution guidance. We propose a conceptual model decomposing prompts into three interrelated components: Functionality and Quality (the requirement), General Solutions (architectural strategy and technology choices) and Specific Solutions (implementation-level constraints). We assess this model using existing prompts, examining how these components manifest in practice. Based on this model and the initial assessment, we formulate four hypotheses: prompts evolve toward specificity, evolution varies by user characteristics, engineers using prompting engage in increased requirement validation and verification, and progressive prompt refinement yields higher code quality. Our vision is to empirically evaluate these hypotheses through analysis of real-world AI-assisted development, with datasets, corpus analysis, and controlled experiments, ultimately deriving best practices for requirements-aware prompt engineering. By rethinking prompts through the lens of RE, we position prompting not merely as a technical skill, but as a central concern for software engineering's future.

Related papers

• ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
  We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z)
• Intent Formalization: A Grand Challenge for Reliable Coding in the Age of AI Agents [7.228124845671868]
  Agentic AI systems can now generate code with remarkable fluency.<n>But a fundamental question remains: emphdoes the generated code actually do what the user intended?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T21:28:59Z)
• REprompt: Prompt Generation for Intelligent Software Development Guided by Requirements Engineering [43.0808976544794]
  Large language models increasingly function as foundation models within coding agents.<n> prompts play a central role in agent-based intelligent software development.<n>We propose REprompt, a multi-agent prompt optimization framework guided by requirements engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T07:14:34Z)
• Guidelines to Prompt Large Language Models for Code Generation: An Empirical Characterization [82.29178197694819]
  We derive and evaluate development-specific prompt optimization guidelines.<n>We use an iterative, test-driven approach to automatically refine code generation prompts.<n>We conduct an assessment with 50 practitioners, who report their usage of the elicited prompt improvement patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T15:01:42Z)
• Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents [63.03252293761656]
  This paper systematically reviews the technologies, applications, and evaluation methods of industry agents based on large language models (LLMs)<n>We examine the three key technological pillars that support the advancement of agent capabilities: Memory, Planning, and Tool Use.<n>We provide an overview of the application of industry agents in real-world domains such as digital engineering, scientific discovery, embodied intelligence, collaborative business execution, and complex system simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T12:46:55Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
  This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z)
• Vibe Coding: Toward an AI-Native Paradigm for Semantic and Intent-Driven Programming [0.0]
  This paper introduces vibe coding, an emerging AI-native programming paradigm in which a developer specifies high-level functional intent along with qualitative descriptors of the desired "vibe"<n>An intelligent agent then transforms those specifications into executable software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T22:31:53Z)
• Grammar-Guided Evolutionary Search for Discrete Prompt Optimisation [63.97051732013936]
  We propose an evolutionary search approach to automated discrete prompt optimisation consisting of two phases.<n>In the first phase, grammar-guided genetic programming is invoked to synthesise prompt-creating programmes.<n>In the second phase, local search is applied to explore the neighbourhoods of best-performing programmes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T14:34:15Z)
• Towards Conversational Development Environments: Using Theory-of-Mind and Multi-Agent Architectures for Requirements Refinement [8.20761565595339]
  This paper introduces a novel approach that leverages an FM-powered multi-agent system called AlignMind to address this issue.<n>By having a cognitive architecture that enhances FMs with Theory-of-Mind capabilities, our approach considers the mental states and perspectives of software makers.<n>We demonstrate that our approach can accurately capture the intents and requirements of stakeholders, articulating them as both specifications and a step-by-step plan of action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T10:05:26Z)
• UOOR: Seamless and Traceable Requirements [28.579389358111115]
  The proposed solution is a requirements engineering method, called UOOR.<n>The method unifies many known requirements concepts and a few new ones in a framework entirely devised to accommodate and support seamless change throughout the project lifecycle.<n>The UOOR approach is not just a theoretical proposal but has been designed for practical use and has been applied to a significant real-world case study: Roborace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T20:03:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.