Federated Computing as Code (FCaC): Sovereignty-aware Systems by Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17331v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 03:52:40 GMT
• Title: Federated Computing as Code (FCaC): Sovereignty-aware Systems by Design
• Abstract summary: Federated computing (FC) enables collaborative computation such as machine learning, analytics, or data processing across distributed organizations keeping raw data local.<n>FCaC is a declarative architecture that addresses this gap by compiling authority and delegation into cryptographically verifiable artifacts rather than relying on online policy interpretation.<n>We demonstrate the approach in a proof-of-concept cross-silo federated learning workflow using MNIST as a surrogate workload to validate the admission mechanisms and release an open-source implementation showing envelope issuance, boundary verification, and envelope-triggered training.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated computing (FC) enables collaborative computation such as machine learning, analytics, or data processing across distributed organizations keeping raw data local. Built on four architectural pillars, distributed data assets, federated services, standardized APIs, and decentralized services, FC supports sovereignty-preserving collaboration. However, federated systems spanning organizational and jurisdictional boundaries lack a portable mechanism for enforcing sovereignty-critical constraints. They often depend on runtime policy evaluation, shared trust infrastructure, or institutional agreements that introduce coordination overhead and provide limited cryptographic assurance. Federated Computing as Code (FCaC) is a declarative architecture that addresses this gap by compiling authority and delegation into cryptographically verifiable artifacts rather than relying on online policy interpretation. Boundary admission becomes a local verification step rather than a policy decision service. FCaC separates constitutional governance from procedural governance. Admission is validated locally at execution boundaries using proof-carrying capabilities, while stateful services may still implement post-admission controls such as ABAC, risk scoring, quotas, and workflow state. FCaC introduces Virtual Federated Platforms (VFPs), which combine Core, Business, and Governance contracts through a cryptographic trust chain: Key Your Organization (KYO), Envelope Capability Tokens (ECTs), and proof of possession (PoP). We demonstrate the approach in a proof-of-concept cross-silo federated learning workflow using MNIST as a surrogate workload to validate the admission mechanisms and release an open-source implementation showing envelope issuance, boundary verification, and envelope-triggered training.

Related papers

• Deploying and validating a metropolitan QKD secure network: architecture and field performance [76.02413102965598]
  Quantum Key Distribution provides information-theoretic security for key establishment.<n>A metropolitan-scale quantum-secure network between data centers in Milan is reported.<n>Results establish the technical and operational readiness of metropolitan QKD networks for production deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T15:51:26Z)
• GCVE: A Decentralized Model for Vulnerability Identification, Publication, and Operational Enrichment [51.77969450792284]
  The Global CVE initiative (G) proposes a decentralized, open, and identifier model for vulnerability identification, publication, and enrichment.<n>This paper presents G as socio-technical effort combining autonomous G Numbering Authorities, lightweight allocation rules, distributed publication, open Best Current Practices, and practical reference implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T19:03:39Z)
• Compliance Management for Federated Data Processing [1.3836910960262496]
  Federated data processing (FDP) offers a promising approach for enabling collaborative analysis of sensitive data without centralizing raw datasets.<n>We present a framework for compliance-aware FDP that integrates policy-as-code, workflow orchestration, and large language model (LLM)-assisted compliance management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T22:10:25Z)
• Toward a Sustainable Federated Learning Ecosystem: A Practical Least Core Mechanism for Payoff Allocation [71.86087908416255]
  We introduce a payoff allocation framework based on the least core (LC) concept.<n>Unlike traditional methods, the LC prioritizes the cohesion of the federation by minimizing the maximum dissatisfaction.<n>Case studies in federated intrusion detection demonstrate that our mechanism correctly identifies pivotal contributors and strategic alliances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:10:50Z)
• Interoperable Architecture for Digital Identity Delegation for AI Agents with Blockchain Integration [0.0]
  We introduce a unified framework that enables bounded, auditable, and least-privilege delegation across heterogeneous identity ecosystems.<n>The framework includes four key elements: Delegation Grants (DGs), first-class authorization artefacts that encode revocable transfers of authority with enforced scope reduction.<n>It also includes a layered reference architecture that separates trust anchoring, credential and proof validation, policy evaluation, and protocol mediation via a Trust Gateway.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T13:29:23Z)
• Privacy-Preserving On-chain Permissioning for KYC-Compliant Decentralized Applications [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel synthesis of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Attribute-Based Access Control.<n>We provide a comprehensive framework for permissioned dApps that aligns decentralized trust, privacy, and transparency, harmonizing blockchain principles with regulatory compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T11:24:51Z)
• Bridging the Mobile Trust Gap: A Zero Trust Framework for Consumer-Facing Applications [51.56484100374058]
  This paper proposes an extended Zero Trust model designed for mobile applications operating in untrusted, user-controlled environments.<n>Using a design science methodology, the study introduced a six-pillar framework that supports runtime enforcement of trust.<n>The proposed model offers a practical and standards-aligned approach to securing mobile applications beyond pre-deployment controls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T18:42:36Z)
• Toward a Global Regime for Compute Governance: Building the Pause Button [0.4952055253916912]
  We propose a governance system designed to prevent AI systems from being trained by restricting access to computational resources.<n>We identify three key intervention points -- technical, traceability, and regulatory -- and organize them within a Governance--Enforcement--Verification framework.<n> Technical mechanisms include tamper-proof FLOP caps, model locking, and offline licensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T15:18:19Z)
• Trusted Compute Units: A Framework for Chained Verifiable Computations [41.94295877935867]
  This paper introduces the Trusted Compute Unit (TCU), a unifying framework that enables composable and interoperable computations across heterogeneous technologies.<n>By enabling secure off-chain interactions without incurring on-chain confirmation delays or gas fees, TCUs significantly improve system performance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T09:01:55Z)
• Balancing Confidentiality and Transparency for Blockchain-based Process-Aware Information Systems [43.253676241213626]
  We propose an architecture for blockchain-based PAISs to preserve confidentiality and transparency.<n>Smart contracts enact, enforce and store public interactions, while attribute-based encryption techniques are adopted to specify access grants to confidential information.<n>We assess the security of our solution through a systematic threat model analysis and evaluate its practical feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T20:18:36Z)
• End-to-End Verifiable Decentralized Federated Learning [1.374949083138427]
  Verifiable decentralized federated learning (FL) systems combine blockchains and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) We propose a verifiable decentralized FL system for end-to-end integrity and authenticity of data and extending verifiability to the data source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T04:43:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.