Balancing the Reasoning Load: Difficulty-Differentiated Policy Optimization with Length Redistribution for Efficient and Robust Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18533v2
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:18:10 GMT
- Title: Balancing the Reasoning Load: Difficulty-Differentiated Policy Optimization with Length Redistribution for Efficient and Robust Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown exceptional reasoning capabilities, but they also suffer from the issue of overthinking.<n>For problems that exceed the model's capabilities, LRMs tend to exhibit the overconfidence phenomenon, generating overly short but incorrect answers.<n>We propose Difficulty-Differentiated Policy Optimization (DDPO), an efficient reinforcement learning algorithm that optimize simple and complex tasks separately.
- Score: 21.035897836243915
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown exceptional reasoning capabilities, but they also suffer from the issue of overthinking, often generating excessively long and redundant answers. For problems that exceed the model's capabilities, LRMs tend to exhibit the overconfidence phenomenon, generating overly short but incorrect answers, which may contribute to suboptimal performance. To address these issues, we propose Difficulty-Differentiated Policy Optimization (DDPO), an efficient reinforcement learning algorithm that optimizes simple and complex tasks separately based on the overconfidence phenomenon. Specifically, it reduces the output length for simple tasks without compromising accuracy, while for complex tasks, it expands the exploration space to improve performance. We further derive the theoretical conditions for maximizing expected accuracy, which require the length distribution to closely approximate the optimal length and be as concentrated as possible. Based on these conditions, we propose using the difficulty-level average as a well-founded reference for length optimization. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks validate the superiority and effectiveness of DDPO. Compared to GRPO, DDPO reduces the average answer length by 12% while improving accuracy by 1.85% across multiple benchmarks, achieving a better trade-off between accuracy and length. The code is available at https://github.com/Yinan-Xia/DDPO.
Related papers
- Stabilizing Efficient Reasoning with Step-Level Advantage Selection [54.563811052329235]
We show that short-context post-training alone, using standard GRPO without any length-aware objective, already induces substantial reasoning compression.<n>We propose Step-level Advantage Selection (SAS), which operates at the reasoning-step level and assigns a zero advantage to low-confidence steps in correct rollouts and to high-confidence steps in verifier-failed rollouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T03:34:59Z) - SmartThinker: Progressive Chain-of-Thought Length Calibration for Efficient Large Language Model Reasoning [34.14269693187003]
We propose SmartThinker, a novel efficient reasoning method with progressive CoT length calibration.<n>Experiment results show that SmartThinker achieves up to 52.5% average length compression with improved accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T06:08:14Z) - ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z) - On-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning for Efficient Reasoning [27.67711115864118]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) are commonly trained with reinforcement learning (RL) to explore long chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>Recent methods add multi-reward objectives to jointly optimize correctness and brevity, but these complex extensions often destabilize training and yield suboptimal trade-offs.<n>We propose a simplified training strategy on-policy SFT, which reduces CoT length by up to 80 while maintaining original accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T19:16:39Z) - DTS: Enhancing Large Reasoning Models via Decoding Tree Sketching [54.98126916293868]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) produce excessively long chain-of-thought traces that degrade accuracy.<n>We propose a model-agnostic decoding framework that sketches the reasoning space by branching at high-entropy tokens and applies early stopping to select the shortest completed reasoning path.<n>This approach approximates the optimal solution that enhances both efficiency and accuracy, without requiring additional training or supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T17:41:28Z) - DeepCompress: A Dual Reward Strategy for Dynamically Exploring and Compressing Reasoning Chains [56.708381920156256]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities but suffer from cognitive inefficiencies like overthinking'' simple problems and underthinking'' complex ones.<n>This paper introduces textbfDeepCompress, a novel framework that simultaneously enhances both the accuracy and efficiency of LRMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T12:13:11Z) - DRPO: Efficient Reasoning via Decoupled Reward Policy Optimization [37.96314154235252]
We propose a novel framework that decouples the length-based learning signal of correct rollouts from incorrect ones.<n>With a 1.5B model, our method achieves 77% length reduction with only 1.1% performance loss on simple questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T04:18:13Z) - HiPO: Hybrid Policy Optimization for Dynamic Reasoning in LLMs [54.16300997612526]
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to improve accuracy on complex tasks.<n>This paper introduces the Hybrid Policy Optimization (i.e., HiPO), a framework for adaptive reasoning control.<n> Experiments across mathematics and coding benchmarks demonstrate that HiPO can substantially reduce token length while maintaining or improving accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T16:46:12Z) - Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffolding [59.60915947702282]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has achieved remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Existing RLVR methods often suffer from exploration inefficiency due to mismatches between the training data's difficulty and the model's capability.<n>We propose SEELE, a novel supervision-aided RLVR framework that dynamically adjusts problem difficulty to stay within the high-efficiency region.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T17:36:21Z) - Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of Large Reasoning Models via Small-Scale Preference Optimization [26.462701299259248]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks through long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>Their lengthy outputs increase computational costs and may lead to overthinking, raising challenges in balancing reasoning effectiveness and efficiency.<n>This paper investigates efficient methods to reduce the generation length of LRMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T20:00:09Z) - HAPO: Training Language Models to Reason Concisely via History-Aware Policy Optimization [17.844933477135523]
We present History-Aware Policy Optimization (HAPO), which keeps track of a history state for each problem.<n>HAPO employs a novel length reward function based on this history state to incentivize the discovery of correct solutions.<n>Experiment results demonstrate that HAPO effectively induces LLMs' concise reasoning abilities, producing length reductions of 33-59% with accuracy drops of only 2-5%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T13:21:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.