Authority-Level Priors: An Under-Specified Constraint in Hierarchical Predictive Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18888v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:27:47 GMT
• Title: Authority-Level Priors: An Under-Specified Constraint in Hierarchical Predictive Processing
• Abstract summary: Authority-Level Priors (ALPs) are meta-structural constraints defining a regulatory-admissible subset of identity-level hypotheses.<n>ALPs are not additional representational states nor hyperpriors over precision; they constrain which hypotheses are admissible for regulatory control.<n>A computational formalisation restricts policy optimisation to policies generated by authorised hypotheses.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Hierarchical predictive processing explains adaptive behaviour through precision-weighted inference. Explicit belief revision often fails to produce corresponding changes in stress reactivity or autonomic regulation. This asymmetry suggests the framework leaves under-specified a governance-level constraint concerning which identity-level hypotheses regulate autonomic and behavioural control under uncertainty. We introduce Authority-Level Priors (ALPs) as meta-structural constraints defining a regulatory-admissible subset (Hauth, a subset of H) of identity-level hypotheses. ALPs are not additional representational states nor hyperpriors over precision; they constrain which hypotheses are admissible for regulatory control. Precision determines influence conditional on admissibility; ALPs determine admissibility itself. This explains why explicit belief updating modifies representational beliefs while autonomic threat responses remain stable. A computational formalisation restricts policy optimisation to policies generated by authorised hypotheses, yielding testable predictions concerning stress-reactivity dynamics, recovery time constants, compensatory control engagement, and behavioural persistence. Neurobiologically, ALPs manifest through distributed prefrontal arbitration and control networks. The proposal is compatible with variational active inference and introduces no additional inferential operators, instead formalising a boundary condition required for determinate identity-regulation mapping. The model generates falsifiable predictions: governance shifts should produce measurable changes in stress-reactivity curves, recovery dynamics, compensatory cognitive effort, and behavioural change durability. ALPs are advanced as an architectural hypothesis to be evaluated through computational modelling and longitudinal stress-induction paradigms.

Related papers

• Verification of Adaptive Agentic Controllers through Finite Rule Revision [0.0]
  This paper formulates a bounded verification protocol for adaptive agentic controllers represented by finite symbolic rules.<n> diagnostic failures are mapped to predefined rule-level edits, including rule addition, rule deletion, and priority revision.<n> repaired controllers are then evaluated on held-out simulation seeds or cloned initial states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T13:38:01Z)
• Transfer Learning Across Policy Regimes in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems [0.0]
  Policy models often assume that the relationship between a policy instrument and its outcome remains stable across institutional conditions.<n>This paper studies such regime change as a transfer-learning problem in adaptive multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T10:16:01Z)
• Structural Distinguishability of Static and Adaptive Policy Regimes in Agent-Based Regulatory Simulation [0.0]
  This paper contributes a controlled simulation benchmark rather than a new general framework.<n>We evaluate naive fixed policies, tracking-aware fixed policies, and three adaptive controllers: setpoint, safety-margin, and one-sided control.<n>The contribution is methodological: scalar indicators, cap-relative symbolic diagnostics, trajectory motifs, and visual inspection jointly reveal how regulatory conclusions can differ even when average outcomes appear similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T10:06:32Z)
• Does Reasoning Preserve Alignment? On the Trustworthiness of Large Reasoning Models [55.788110316999166]
  We compare reasoning models produced via supervised fine-tuning, RL-based post-training, and distillation against instruction-tuned baselines.<n>We observe that reasoning models often improve on reasoning benchmarks but exhibit alignment regressions.<n>These regressions are consistent with behavioral drift from the instruction-tuned baseline, measured by KL divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T16:14:27Z)
• CellScientist: Dual-Space Hierarchical Orchestration for Closed-Loop Refinement of Virtual Cell Models [62.281480231694]
  Virtual Cell Modeling (VCM) requires models that not only predict perturbation responses, but also support targeted revision when predictions fail.<n>Current LLM-assisted modeling face a refinement-routing problem: prediction discrepancies are observed through executable implementations.<n>We propose CellScientist, a dual-space hierarchical framework that couples a high-level hypothesis space with a low-level executable implementation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T06:40:24Z)
• PolicyBank: Evolving Policy Understanding for LLM Agents [51.86716874651299]
  PolicyBank maintains structured, tool-level policy insights and iteratively refines them.<n>PolicyBank closes up to 82% of the gap toward a human oracle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T20:29:30Z)
• Agentic Control in Variational Language Models [0.0]
  We study whether a variational language model can support a minimal and measurable form of agentic control grounded in its own internal evidence.<n>Our model combines local variational hidden computation (EVE), a homeostatic latent regulator, structurally aware checkpoint retention and a calibrated uncertainty-aware controller operating on top of the retained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T09:47:53Z)
• IRAM-Omega-Q: A Computational Architecture for Uncertainty Regulation in Artificial Agents [0.0]
  We present IRAM-Omega-Q, a computational architecture that models internal regulation as closed-loop control over a quantum-like state representation.<n>Results support uncertainty regulation as a concrete architectural principle for artificial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T23:58:11Z)
• Machine Learning for Stress Testing: Uncertainty Decomposition in Causal Panel Prediction [2.289837306672451]
  Regulatory stress testing requires projecting credit losses under hypothetical macroeconomic scenarios.<n>We propose a framework for policy-path counterfactual inference in panels.<n>We validate all results through simulation and semi-synthetic experiments with real unemployment data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-08T03:22:38Z)
• What Capable Agents Must Know: Selection Theorems for Robust Decision-Making under Uncertainty [1.6868147729303773]
  We prove "selection theorems" showing that low "average-case regret" forces an agent to implement a predictive, structured internal state.<n>We show that regret bounds limit probability mass on suboptimal bets, enforcing the predictive distinctions needed to separate high-margin outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T00:47:58Z)
• The Emergence of Lab-Driven Alignment Signatures: A Psychometric Framework for Auditing Latent Bias and Compounding Risk in Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel auditing framework to quantify latent trait estimation under ordinal uncertainty.<n>The research audits nine leading models across dimensions including Optimization Bias, Sycophancy, and Status-Quo Legitimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:56:01Z)
• Active Inference with Reusable State-Dependent Value Profiles [0.0]
  We introduce value profiles: a small set of reusable bundles of value-related parameters assigned to hidden states in a generative model.<n>We evaluate this framework in probabilistic reversal learning, comparing static-precision, entropy-coupled dynamic-precision, and profile-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T04:11:57Z)
• LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z)
• Rediscovering Entropy Regularization: Adaptive Coefficient Unlocks Its Potential for LLM Reinforcement Learning [55.59724323303857]
  We propose a framework that balances exploration and exploitation via three components: difficulty-aware coefficient allocation, initial-anchored target entropy, and dynamic global coefficient adjustment.<n>Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that AER consistently outperforms baselines, improving both reasoning accuracy and exploration capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T03:10:26Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Unifying Perplexing Behaviors in Modified BP Attributions through Alignment Perspective [61.5509267439999]
  We present a unified theoretical framework for methods like GBP, RectGrad, LRP, and DTD.<n>We demonstrate that they achieve input alignment by combining the weights of activated neurons.<n>This alignment improves the visualization quality and reduces sensitivity to weight randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T07:58:26Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.