Exploring the Agentic Frontier of Verilog Code Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19347v2
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:20:05 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Agentic Frontier of Verilog Code Generation
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic evaluation of agentic LLMs for Verilog generation.<n>We study how structured prompting and tool design affect performance.<n>We find that the performance gap between open and closed source models is driven by both higher crash rates and weaker tool output interpretation.
• Score: 21.677000877812063
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have made rapid advancements in code generation for popular languages such as Python and C++. Many of these recent gains can be attributed to the use of ``agents'' that wrap domain-relevant tools alongside LLMs. Hardware design languages such as Verilog have also seen improved code generation in recent years, but the impact of agentic frameworks on Verilog code generation tasks remains unclear. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of agentic LLMs for Verilog generation, using the recently introduced CVDP benchmark. We also introduce several open-source hardware design agent harnesses, providing a model-agnostic baseline for future work. Through controlled experiments across frontier models, we study how structured prompting and tool design affect performance, analyze agent failure modes and tool usage patterns, compare open-source and closed-source models, and provide qualitative examples of successful and failed agent runs. Our results show that naive agentic wrapping around frontier models can degrade performance (relative to standard forward passes with optimized prompts), but that structured harnesses meaningfully match and in some cases exceed non-agentic baselines. We find that the performance gap between open and closed source models is driven by both higher crash rates and weaker tool output interpretation. Our exploration illuminates the path towards designing special-purpose agents for verilog generation in the future.

Related papers

• Prime Agent: A Self-Improving RLM Harness [5.540645425386541]
  Prime Agent is an open-source harness for long-horizon evaluation and coding-agent.<n>It standardizes execution, recovery, verification, and resource accounting while leaving strategy construction to the model.<n>Prime Agent raises ARC-AGI-3 RHAE Best@1 from 30% to 95.5% and matches or exceeds native and popular harnesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T17:54:19Z)
• VESTA: Visual Exploration with Statistical Tool Agents [56.76643750765825]
  We introduce VESTA: Visual Exploration with Statistical Tool Agents.<n>We show that VESTA's dynamic tool creation outperforms prior agentic pipelines.<n>We also introduce DAWN, a benchmark targeting distribution fitting and time series.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T21:57:37Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• Exploring LLM-based Verilog Code Generation with Data-Efficient Fine-Tuning and Testbench Automation [1.2868785387618027]
  This paper presents a workflow that uses multi-agent models to generate testbenches for high-quality fine-tuning data.<n>By automating testbench creation, the fine-tuned model for the specification-to-Verilog task achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T06:02:39Z)
• VeriAgent: A Tool-Integrated Multi-Agent System with Evolving Memory for PPA-Aware RTL Code Generation [52.43796056267479]
  We propose a PPA-aware, tool-integrated multi-agent framework for high-quality verilog code generation.<n>Our framework explicitly incorporates EDA tools into a closed-loop workflow composed of a textitProgrammer Agent, a textitCorrectness Agent, and a textitPPA Agent<n>To support continuous improvement without model retraining, we introduce an textitEvolved Memory Mechanism that externalizes optimization experience into structured memory nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T11:25:40Z)
• SiliconMind-V1: Multi-Agent Distillation and Debug-Reasoning Workflows for Verilog Code Generation [1.8797634116550468]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for automating Verilog code generation.<n>This work proposes a unified multi-agent framework for reasoning-oriented training data generation with integrated testbench-driven verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T06:43:20Z)
• Bridging the Knowledge Void: Inference-time Acquisition of Unfamiliar Programming Languages for Coding Tasks [22.908904483320953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in coding tasks are often a reflection of their extensive pre-training corpora.<n>We propose ILA-agent, a general ILA framework that equips LLMs with a set of behavioral primitives.<n>We instantiate ILA-agent for Cangjie and evaluate its performance across code generation, translation, and program repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T09:06:47Z)
• Sample-Efficient Online Learning in LM Agents via Hindsight Trajectory Rewriting [92.57796055887995]
  We introduce ECHO, a prompting framework that adapts hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning for language model agents.<n> ECHO generates optimized trajectories for alternative goals that could have been achieved during failed attempts.<n>We evaluate ECHO on stateful versions of XMiniGrid, a text-based navigation and planning benchmark, and PeopleJoinQA, a collaborative information-gathering enterprise simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T18:11:09Z)
• Every Step Counts: Decoding Trajectories as Authorship Fingerprints of dLLMs [63.82840470917859]
  We show that the decoding mechanism of dLLMs can be used as a powerful tool for model attribution.<n>We propose a novel information extraction scheme called the Directed Decoding Map (DDM), which captures structural relationships between decoding steps and better reveals model-specific behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T06:25:10Z)
• On LLM-Assisted Generation of Smart Contracts from Business Processes [0.08192907805418582]
  Large language models (LLMs) have changed the reality of how software is produced.<n>We present an exploratory study to investigate the use of LLMs for generating smart contract code from business process descriptions.<n>Our results show that LLM performance falls short of the perfect reliability required for smart contract development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T20:39:45Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• Large Language Model for Verilog Generation with Code-Structure-Guided Reinforcement Learning [29.135207235743795]
  This paper introduces VeriSeek, an LLM enhanced by reinforcement learning to achieve high Verilog code generation performance.<n>Our reinforcement learning approach employs code structure information as feedback signals to refine the pre-trained model.<n>Experiments show that VeriSeek outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T11:25:21Z)
• SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents [10.730852617039451]
  We investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents to formalize user issues into test cases.<n>We propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth bug-fixes, and golden tests.<n>We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases, with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed for test generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:54:37Z)
• RepoAgent: An LLM-Powered Open-Source Framework for Repository-level Code Documentation Generation [79.83270415843857]
  We introduce RepoAgent, a large language model powered open-source framework aimed at proactively generating, maintaining, and updating code documentation. We have validated the effectiveness of our approach, showing that RepoAgent excels in generating high-quality repository-level documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T15:39:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.