Bypassing Document Ingestion: An MCP Approach to Financial Q&A

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20316v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 22:04:42 GMT
• Title: Bypassing Document Ingestion: An MCP Approach to Financial Q&A
• Abstract summary: We study whether, and under which conditions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) offers a more reliable alternative to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>We test this by building a custom MCP server that exposes LSEG APIs as tools and evaluating it on the FinDER benchmark.<n>The approach performs particularly well on the Financials subset, achieving up to 80.4% accuracy on multi-step numerical questions when relevant context is retrieved.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Answering financial questions is often treated as an information retrieval problem. In practice, however, much of the relevant information is already available in curated vendor systems, especially for quantitative analysis. We study whether, and under which conditions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) offers a more reliable alternative to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by allowing large language models (LLMs) to interact directly with data rather than relying on document ingestion and chunk retrieval. We test this by building a custom MCP server that exposes LSEG APIs as tools and evaluating it on the FinDER benchmark. The approach performs particularly well on the Financials subset, achieving up to 80.4% accuracy on multi-step numerical questions when relevant context is retrieved. The paper thus provides both a baseline for MCP-based financial question answering (QA) and evidence on where this approach breaks down, such as for questions requiring qualitative or document-specific context. Overall, direct access to curated data is a lightweight and effective alternative to document-centric RAG for quantitative financial QA, but not a substitute for all financial QA tasks.

Related papers

• Navigating Large-Scale Document Collections: MuDABench for Multi-Document Analytical QA [25.155696504567718]
  This paper introduces the task of analytical question answering over large, semi-structured document collections.<n>We present MuDABench, a benchmark for multi-document analytical QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T05:28:51Z)
• Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding [61.36285696607487]
  Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery.<n>Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) face key limitations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents' multimodal nature, combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T02:33:16Z)
• FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering [57.43420753842626]
  FinLFQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to generate long-form answers to complex financial questions.<n>We provide an automatic evaluation framework covering both answer quality and attribution quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T20:06:15Z)
• FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering [57.18367828883773]
  FinAgentBench is a benchmark for evaluating agentic retrieval with multi-step reasoning in finance.<n>The benchmark consists of 26K expert-annotated examples on S&P-500 listed firms.<n>We evaluate a suite of state-of-the-art models and demonstrate how targeted fine-tuning can significantly improve agentic retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T22:15:22Z)
• FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation [65.04104723843264]
  We present FinDER, an expert-generated dataset tailored for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in finance.<n>FinDER focuses on annotating search-relevant evidence by domain experts, offering 5,703 query-evidence-answer triplets.<n>By challenging models to retrieve relevant information from large corpora, FinDER offers a more realistic benchmark for evaluating RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T11:30:13Z)
• FinSage: A Multi-aspect RAG System for Financial Filings Question Answering [10.953520766530005]
  FinSage is a multi-modal pre-processing pipeline that unifies diverse data formats and generates metadata summaries.<n>Experiments demonstrate that FinSage achieves an impressive recall of 92.51% on 75 expert-curated questions.<n>FinSage has been successfully deployed as financial question-answering agent in online meetings, where it has already served more than 1,200 people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T04:58:14Z)
• SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA [12.279234447220155]
  Existing datasets are often constrained by size, context, or relevance to practical applications. We propose SEC-QA, a continuous dataset generation framework with two key features. We introduce a QA system based on program-of-thought that improves the ability to perform complex information retrieval and quantitative reasoning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T15:12:41Z)
• FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data [52.7249610894623]
  We focus on answering deep questions over financial data, aiming to automate the analysis of a large corpus of financial documents. We propose a new large-scale dataset, FinQA, with Question-Answering pairs over Financial reports, written by financial experts. The results demonstrate that popular, large, pre-trained models fall far short of expert humans in acquiring finance knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T00:08:14Z)
• Query Focused Multi-Document Summarization with Distant Supervision [88.39032981994535]
  Existing work relies heavily on retrieval-style methods for estimating the relevance between queries and text segments. We propose a coarse-to-fine modeling framework which introduces separate modules for estimating whether segments are relevant to the query. We demonstrate that our framework outperforms strong comparison systems on standard QFS benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T22:35:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.