Where can AI be used? Insights from a deep ontology of work activities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20619v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 03:28:39 GMT
• Title: Where can AI be used? Insights from a deep ontology of work activities
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to profoundly reshape how work is executed and organized.<n>We provide a comprehensive ontology of work activities that can help systematically analyze and predict uses of AI.<n>We use this framework to classify descriptions of 13,275 AI software applications and a worldwide tally of 20.8 million robotic systems.
• Score: 14.450099263467926
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to profoundly reshape how work is executed and organized, but we do not yet have deep frameworks for understanding where AI can be used. Here we provide a comprehensive ontology of work activities that can help systematically analyze and predict uses of AI. To do this, we disaggregate and then substantially reorganize the approximately 20K activities in the US Department of Labor's widely used O*NET occupational database. Next, we use this framework to classify descriptions of 13,275 AI software applications and a worldwide tally of 20.8 million robotic systems. Finally, we use the data about both these kinds of AI to generate graphical displays of how the estimated units and market values of all worldwide AI systems used today are distributed across the work activities that these systems help perform. We find a highly uneven distribution of AI market value across activities, with the top 1.6% of activities accounting for over 60% of AI market value. Most of the market value is used in information-based activities (72%), especially creating information (36%), and only 12% is used in physical activities. Interactive activities include both information-based and physical activities and account for 48% of AI market value, much of which (26%) involves transferring information. These results can be viewed as rough predictions of the AI applicability for all the different work activities down to very low levels of detail. Thus, we believe this systematic framework can help predict at a detailed level where today's AI systems can and cannot be used and how future AI capabilities may change this.

Related papers

• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• Google's AI & Economy ATLAS v1.0: Mapping Gemini Usage in the Economy [0.6108840581138503]
  ATLAS is built on 15 million de-identified interactions across the Gemini App, Google AI Mode, and Gemini API.<n>We map AI usage to over 800 occupations, 4000 tasks, 300 household activities, 150 countries, and 140 languages.<n>In the workplace, we show that while AI adoption spans occupations covering just above 88% of US employment, penetration remains shallow and overwhelmingly collaborative in nature.<n>Outside of work, AI spans activities making up about 98% of Americans' non-sleep time, with disproportionately high use in high-friction tasks such as engaging with government and professional service providers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T22:20:37Z)
• The Open Source Economic Index of AI Adoption and Capability [27.900759713490576]
  We work towards measuring both AI adoption and the capability of AI to perform discrete labor tasks across various occupations.<n>We develop an open-source economic index that uses publicly available user-LLM chat data and O*NET tasks to replicate studies produced by frontier AI labs.<n>We build a system that generates benchmark scenarios grounded in O*NET occupations, tasks, and model-context-protocol (MCP) servers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T18:45:42Z)
• AgentDS Technical Report: Benchmarking the Future of Human-AI Collaboration in Domain-Specific Data Science [30.303936447998314]
  Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (AI) agents have significantly automated data science workflow.<n>It remains unclear to what extent AI agents can match the performance of human experts on domain-specific data science tasks.<n>We introduce AgentDS, a benchmark and competition designed to evaluate both AI agents and human-AI collaboration performance in domain-specific data science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T15:11:13Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations [6.459048123863439]
  We analyze a dataset of 200k anonymized conversations between users and Microsoft Bing Copilot.<n>We find the most common work activities people seek AI assistance for involve gathering information and writing.<n>The most common activities that AI itself is performing are providing information and assistance, writing, teaching, and advising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T17:16:33Z)
• General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Power [57.7995945974989]
  benchmarking has guided progress in AI, but it has offered limited explanatory and predictive power for general-purpose AI systems.<n>We introduce general scales for AI evaluation that can explain what common AI benchmarks really measure.<n>Our fully-automated methodology builds on 18 newly-crafted rubrics that place instance demands on general scales that do not saturate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T01:13:56Z)
• Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations [18.86239369192921]
  We leverage a recent privacy-preserving system to analyze over four million Claude.ai conversations.<n>Our analysis reveals that AI usage primarily concentrates in software development and writing tasks.<n>We also analyze how AI is being used for tasks, finding 57% of usage suggests augmentation of human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T00:46:43Z)
• TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks [55.03911355902567]
  We introduce TheAgentCompany, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker.<n>We find that the most competitive agent can complete 30% of tasks autonomously.<n>This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with simulating LM agents in a setting a real workplace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T18:55:40Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.