Computational Arbitrage in AI Model Markets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22404v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:00:14 GMT
• Title: Computational Arbitrage in AI Model Markets
• Abstract summary: An arbitrageur efficiently allocates inference budget across providers to undercut the market.<n>We show that simple arbitrage strategies generate net profit margins of up to 40%.<n>Our results suggest that arbitrage can be a powerful force in AI model markets with implications for model development, distillation, and deployment.
• Score: 73.20636221068352
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Consider a market of competing model providers selling query access to models with varying costs and capabilities. Customers submit problem instances and are willing to pay up to a budget for a verifiable solution. An arbitrageur efficiently allocates inference budget across providers to undercut the market, thus creating a competitive offering with no model-development risk. In this work, we initiate the study of arbitrage in AI model markets, empirically demonstrating the viability of arbitrage and illustrating its economic consequences. We conduct an in-depth case study of SWE-bench GitHub issue resolution using two representative models, GPT-5 mini and DeepSeek v3.2. In this verifiable domain, simple arbitrage strategies generate net profit margins of up to 40%. Robust arbitrage strategies that generalize across different domains remain profitable. Distillation further creates strong arbitrage opportunities, potentially at the expense of the teacher model's revenue. Multiple competing arbitrageurs drive down consumer prices, reducing the marginal revenue of model providers. At the same time, arbitrage reduces market segmentation and facilitates market entry for smaller model providers by enabling earlier revenue capture. Our results suggest that arbitrage can be a powerful force in AI model markets with implications for model development, distillation, and deployment.

Related papers

• RouteLMT: Learned Sample Routing for Hybrid LLM Translation Deployment [57.588738943463646]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in Machine Translation (MT)<n> deploying them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.<n>We propose textbfRouteLMT, an in-model router that predicts the expected gain by probing the small translators prompt-token representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T13:02:45Z)
• Training Language Models for Bilateral Trade with Private Information [47.25254982913256]
  Bilateral trade demands individual, strategic surplus rationality, and cooperation to realize gains from trade.<n>We develop a structured bargaining environment where large language models negotiate via tool calls within an event-driven simulator.<n>The environment serves two purposes: a benchmark for frontier models and as a training environment for open-weight models via reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T03:04:20Z)
• PolySwarm: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Prediction Market Trading and Latency Arbitrage [0.0]
  PolySwarm deploys a swarm of 50 diverse LLM personas that concurrently evaluate binary outcome markets.<n>A latency arbitrage module exploits stale Polymarket prices by deriving CEX-implied probabilities from a log-normal pricing model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T22:51:06Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning in Finance: Modeling Market Impact with Elliptic Uncertainty Sets [57.179679246370114]
  In financial applications, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained on historical data, where their actions do not influence prices.<n>During deployment, these agents trade in live markets where their own transactions can shift asset prices, a phenomenon known as market impact.<n>Traditional robust RL approaches address this model misspecification by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of uncertainties.<n>We develop a novel class of elliptic uncertainty sets, enabling efficient and tractable robust policy evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:22:25Z)
• Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets [2.9311414545087366]
  Polymarket is a prediction market platform where users can speculate on future events by shares tied to specific outcomes, known as conditions.<n>Despite this design, Polymarket exhibits cases where dependent assets are mispriced.<n>This phenomenon, known as arbitrage, could enable sophisticated participants to exploit such inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T14:06:50Z)
• Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [62.388554963415906]
  In finance, Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts arising from discrepancies between their pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>These conflicts are especially problematic in real-world investment services, where a model's inherent biases can misalign with institutional objectives.<n>We propose an experimental framework to investigate emergent behaviors in such conflict scenarios, offering a quantitative analysis of bias in investment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z)
• Markets for Models [0.0]
  We study markets in which firms sell models to a consumer to help improve their prediction.<n>We show firms can choose inefficiently biased models or inefficiently costly models to deter entry by competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T19:07:02Z)
• By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
  This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition. We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome. Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z)
• A Network Simulation of OTC Markets with Multiple Agents [3.8944986367855963]
  We present a novel approach to simulating an over-the-counter (OTC) financial market in which trades are intermediated solely by market makers. We show that our network-based model can lend insights into the effect of market-structure on price-action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T20:45:00Z)
• An Auction-based Marketplace for Model Trading in Federated Learning [54.79736037670377]
  Federated learning (FL) is increasingly recognized for its efficacy in training models using locally distributed data. We frame FL as a marketplace of models, where clients act as both buyers and sellers. We propose an auction-based solution to ensure proper pricing based on performance gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T07:25:53Z)
• Deep Q-Learning Market Makers in a Multi-Agent Simulated Stock Market [58.720142291102135]
  This paper focuses precisely on the study of these markets makers strategies from an agent-based perspective. We propose the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the creation of intelligent market markers in simulated stock markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:55:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.