Think 360°: Evaluating the Width-centric Reasoning Capability of MLLMs Beyond Depth

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22689v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 01:29:24 GMT
• Title: Think 360°: Evaluating the Width-centric Reasoning Capability of MLLMs Beyond Depth
• Abstract summary: Reasoning width focuses on the model's capacity for broad trial-and-error search or multi-constrained optimization.<n>We evaluate 12 major model families across difficulty tiers, question types, and required skills.<n>Results show that while current models exhibit strong performance on general or common-sense VQA tasks, they still struggle to combine deep sequential thought chains with wide exploratory search.
• Score: 37.75493687006809
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we present a holistic multimodal benchmark that evaluates the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs with an explicit focus on reasoning width, a complementary dimension to the more commonly studied reasoning depth. Specifically, reasoning depth measures the model's ability to carry out long-chain, sequential reasoning in which each step is tightly and rigorously linked to the next. Reasoning width tends to focus more on the model's capacity for broad trial-and-error search or multi-constrained optimization: it must systematically traverse many possible and parallelized reasoning paths, apply diverse constraints to prune unpromising branches, and identify valid solution routes for efficient iteration or backtracking. To achieve it, we carefully curate 1200+ high-quality multimodal cases spanning heterogeneous domains, and propose a fine-grained tree-of-thought evaluation protocol that jointly quantifies reasoning width and depth. We evaluate 12 major model families (over 30 advanced MLLMs) across difficulty tiers, question types, and required skills. Results show that while current models exhibit strong performance on general or common-sense VQA tasks, they still struggle to combine deep sequential thought chains with wide exploratory search to perform genuine insight-based reasoning. Finally, we analyze characteristic failure modes to provide possible directions for building MLLMs that reason not only deeper but also wider.

Related papers

• From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization [62.07990937720985]
  Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM) is a new supervision framework for Large Language Models.<n>DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions.<n> Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T14:29:15Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Deep Relational Reasoning? Insights from DeepSeek-R1 and Benchmark Comparisons [11.429641860623143]
  We evaluate and compare the reasoning capabilities of three cutting-edge Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>DeepSeek-R1 consistently achieves the highest F1-scores across multiple tasks and problem sizes.<n>A detailed analysis of DeepSeek-R1's long Chain-of-Thought responses uncovers its unique planning and verification strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T07:37:49Z)
• VReST: Enhancing Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models through Tree Search and Self-Reward Mechanism [13.759089543987473]
  We propose VReST, a training-free approach that enhances Reasoning in LVLMs through Monte Carlo Tree Search and Self-Reward mechanisms.<n> VReST surpasses current prompting methods and secures state-of-the-art performance across three multimodal mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T11:02:36Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.84707424369494]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has proven effective in enhancing large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks.<n>We introduce the Reasoning Boundary Framework++ (RBF++), a framework for evaluating and optimizing measurable boundaries of CoT capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T16:25:55Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs)<n>We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.